• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于实体瘤化疗的、连接到Groshong导管的长期完全植入式中心静脉通路端口:178例使用单一类型装置的经验

Long-term, totally implantable central venous access ports connected to a Groshong catheter for chemotherapy of solid tumours: experience from 178 cases using a single type of device.

作者信息

Biffi R, Corrado F, de Braud F, de Lucia F, Scarpa D, Testori A, Orsi F, Bellomi M, Mauri S, Aapro M, Andreoni B

机构信息

Division of General Surgery 2, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 1997 Jul;33(8):1190-4. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00039-7.

DOI:10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00039-7
PMID:9301441
Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the early and late complications rate of central venous access ports connected to the Groshong catheter for long-term chemotherapy delivering. All patients suffering from a neoplastic disease, who required long-term chemotherapy and underwent insertion of implantable ports during a 21-month period (1 October 1994-30 June 1996) were prospectively studied. A single type of port was used, constructed of titanium and silicone rubber (Dome Port, Bard Inc., Salt Lake City, U.S.A), connected to an 8 F silastic Groshong catheter tubing (Bard Inc.). A team of different operators (two general surgeons, one interventional radiologist and four anaesthesiologists) was involved in inserting the port. All devices were placed in the operating room under fluoroscopic control. A central venous access form was filled in by the operator after the procedure and all ports were followed prospectively for device-related and overall complications. Data from the follow-up of these patients were entered in the form and collected in a database. Follow-up continued until the device was removed, the patient died or the study was closed. 178 devices, comprising a total of 32,089 days in situ, were placed in 175 patients. Three patients received a second device after removal of the first. Adequate follow-up was obtained in all cases (median 180 days, range 4-559). 138 devices (77.5%) were still in situ when the study was closed. Early complications included six pneumothoraxes, three arterial punctures and two revisions for port and/or catheter malfunction (overall early complications in 8 patients). Late complications included 3 cases (1.68% of devices) of catheter rupture and embolisation (0.093 episodes/1000 days of use), 2 cases (1.12% of devices) of venous thrombosis (0.062 episodes/1000 days of use), 1 case (0.56% of devices) of pocket infection (0.031 episodes/1000 days of use), and 4 cases (2.24% of devices) of port-related bacteraemias (0.124 episodes/1000 days of use). Infections were caused by coagulase-negative Staphylococcus aureus (4 cases) and Bacillus subtilis (1 case); they required port removal in 3 out of 5 cases. This study represents the largest published series of patients with totally implantable access ports connected to Groshong catheters; this device is a good option for long-term access to central veins and delivery of chemotherapeutic regimens, including continuous intravenous infusions. The low incidence of major complications related to implantation and management of these devices support increased use in oncology patients.

摘要

本研究的目的是检查与Groshong导管相连的中心静脉通路端口用于长期化疗给药的早期和晚期并发症发生率。对所有患有肿瘤疾病、需要长期化疗并在21个月期间(1994年10月1日至1996年6月30日)接受植入式端口插入术的患者进行前瞻性研究。使用了单一类型的端口,由钛和硅橡胶制成(Dome Port,美国犹他州盐湖城的巴德公司),连接到一根8F的硅橡胶Groshong导管(巴德公司)。一个由不同操作人员组成的团队(两名普通外科医生、一名介入放射科医生和四名麻醉医生)参与了端口的插入操作。所有装置均在手术室的荧光透视控制下放置。术后操作人员填写一份中心静脉通路表格,对所有端口进行前瞻性跟踪,记录与装置相关的并发症和总体并发症。这些患者的随访数据录入表格并收集到数据库中。随访持续到装置取出、患者死亡或研究结束。175例患者共植入了178个装置,累计在位32089天。三名患者在取出第一个装置后接受了第二个装置。所有病例均获得了充分的随访(中位随访时间180天,范围4 - 559天)。研究结束时,138个装置(77.5%)仍在位。早期并发症包括6例气胸、3例动脉穿刺以及2例因端口和/或导管故障进行的修复(8例患者出现总体早期并发症)。晚期并发症包括3例(占装置的1.68%)导管破裂和栓塞(0.093次/1000天使用时间)、2例(占装置的1.12%)静脉血栓形成(0.062次/1000天使用时间)、1例(占装置的0.56%)囊袋感染(0.031次/1000天使用时间)以及4例(占装置的2.24%)与端口相关的菌血症(0.124次/1000天使用时间)。感染由凝固酶阴性金黄色葡萄球菌(4例)和枯草芽孢杆菌(1例)引起;5例中有3例需要取出端口。本研究是已发表的与Groshong导管相连的完全植入式通路端口患者系列中规模最大的;该装置是长期进入中心静脉和进行化疗方案给药(包括持续静脉输注)的良好选择。与这些装置植入和管理相关的主要并发症发生率较低,支持在肿瘤患者中增加使用。

相似文献

1
Long-term, totally implantable central venous access ports connected to a Groshong catheter for chemotherapy of solid tumours: experience from 178 cases using a single type of device.用于实体瘤化疗的、连接到Groshong导管的长期完全植入式中心静脉通路端口:178例使用单一类型装置的经验
Eur J Cancer. 1997 Jul;33(8):1190-4. doi: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)00039-7.
2
Totally implantable central venous access ports for long-term chemotherapy. A prospective study analyzing complications and costs of 333 devices with a minimum follow-up of 180 days.用于长期化疗的完全植入式中心静脉通路导管。一项前瞻性研究,分析333个装置的并发症和成本,最短随访期为180天。
Ann Oncol. 1998 Jul;9(7):767-73. doi: 10.1023/a:1008392423469.
3
Totally implantable ports connected to valved catheters for chemotherapy: experience from 350 Groshong devices.用于化疗的连接有带阀导管的完全植入式端口:350个Groshong装置的经验
J Vasc Access. 2010 Jan-Mar;11(1):17-22. doi: 10.1177/112972981001100104.
4
A randomized, prospective trial of central venous ports connected to standard open-ended or Groshong catheters in adult oncology patients.一项针对成年肿瘤患者,比较连接标准开放式导管或Groshong导管的中心静脉端口的随机前瞻性试验。
Cancer. 2001 Sep 1;92(5):1204-12. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010901)92:5<1204::aid-cncr1439>3.0.co;2-9.
5
Late fracture of Groshong ports: A report of the three cases.Groshong导管迟发性断裂:三例报告
J Vasc Access. 2019 Sep;20(5):563-566. doi: 10.1177/1129729819834512. Epub 2019 Mar 11.
6
Implantation of central venous ports with catheter insertion via the right internal jugular vein in oncology patients: single center experience.肿瘤患者经右颈内静脉插入导管植入中心静脉港:单中心经验
Support Care Cancer. 2006 Nov;14(11):1162-5. doi: 10.1007/s00520-006-0073-2. Epub 2006 Apr 5.
7
Use of totally implantable central venous access ports for high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: results of a monocentre series of 376 patients.完全植入式中心静脉通路港在大剂量化疗及外周血干细胞移植中的应用:单中心376例患者的研究结果
Ann Oncol. 2004 Feb;15(2):296-300. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdh049.
8
Totally implantable venous access devices via subclavian vein: a retrospective study of 368 oncology patients.经锁骨下静脉植入的完全植入式静脉通路装置:对368例肿瘤患者的回顾性研究
Adv Ther. 2006 Jul-Aug;23(4):574-81. doi: 10.1007/BF02850046.
9
Implanting totally implantable venous access ports in the upper arm is feasible and safe for patients with early breast cancer.对于早期乳腺癌患者,在上臂植入全植入式静脉通路端口是可行且安全的。
J Vasc Access. 2020 Sep;21(5):609-614. doi: 10.1177/1129729819894461. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
10
A comparison of infections and complications in central venous catheters in adults with solid tumours.实体瘤成年患者中心静脉导管感染与并发症的比较
J Vasc Access. 2015 Jan-Feb;16(1):38-41. doi: 10.5301/jva.5000300. Epub 2014 Sep 1.

引用本文的文献

1
A case of percutaneous retrieval of a catheter without a free end that was fractured during a totally implantable venous access port removal.一例在完全植入式静脉通路端口移除过程中发生断裂且无游离端的导管经皮取出病例。
Radiol Case Rep. 2023 Jun 16;18(9):2911-2917. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2023.05.046. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Catheter Fracture of Subclavian Venous Chemoport Device at Costoclavicular Junction: Pinch-off Syndrome.锁骨下静脉化疗泵装置在肋锁关节处的导管断裂:夹闭综合征。
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2018 Dec;9(4):595-597. doi: 10.1007/s13193-018-0802-2. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
3
Recommended irrigation volume for an intravenous port: Ex vivo simulation study.
推荐的静脉港冲洗容量:离体模拟研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 14;13(8):e0201785. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201785. eCollection 2018.
4
Choosing the appropriate side for subcutaneous port catheter placement in patients with mastectomy: ipsilateral or contralateral?乳房切除术后患者皮下植入式输液港导管放置部位的选择:同侧还是对侧?
Radiol Med. 2017 Jun;122(6):472-478. doi: 10.1007/s11547-017-0736-8. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
5
Port type is a possible risk factor for implantable venous access port-related bloodstream infections and no sign of local infection predicts the growth of gram-negative bacilli.端口类型是植入式静脉通路端口相关血流感染的一个可能风险因素,且无局部感染迹象预示革兰氏阴性杆菌的生长。
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep 30;13:288. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0707-2.
6
The Treatment Results of a Standard Algorithm for Choosing the Best Entry Vessel for Intravenous Port Implantation.一种用于选择静脉输液港植入最佳入路血管的标准算法的治疗结果
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Aug;94(33):e1381. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001381.
7
Performance of venous port catheter insertion by a general surgeon: a prospective study.普通外科医生进行静脉留置针置入术的效果:一项前瞻性研究。
Int Surg. 2015 May;100(5):827-35. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00214.1.
8
Subcutaneous infusion ports via the internal jugular vein: single center experience.经颈内静脉置入皮下输液港:单中心经验
Eurasian J Med. 2010 Aug;42(2):78-80. doi: 10.5152/eajm.2010.22.
9
Increased rates of local complication of central venous catheters in the targeted anticancer therapy era: a 2-year retrospective analysis.靶向抗癌治疗时代中心静脉导管局部并发症发生率增加:一项为期两年的回顾性分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2015 May;23(5):1295-302. doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2466-y. Epub 2014 Oct 19.
10
1000 Port-A-Cath ® placements by subclavian vein approach: single surgeon experience.经锁骨下静脉途径置入1000例Port-A-Cath®:单术者经验
World J Surg. 2015 Feb;39(2):328-34. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2802-x.