• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

端口类型是植入式静脉通路端口相关血流感染的一个可能风险因素,且无局部感染迹象预示革兰氏阴性杆菌的生长。

Port type is a possible risk factor for implantable venous access port-related bloodstream infections and no sign of local infection predicts the growth of gram-negative bacilli.

作者信息

Hsu Jui-Feng, Chang Hsu-Liang, Tsai Ming-Ju, Tsai Ying-Ming, Lee Yen-Lung, Chen Pei-Huan, Fan Wen-Chieh, Su Yu-Chung, Yang Chih-Jen

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, No. 68 Chunghwa 3rd Road, Cianjin District, 80145, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep 30;13:288. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0707-2.

DOI:10.1186/s12957-015-0707-2
PMID:26420628
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4588233/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Implantable venous access port (IVAP)-related blood stream infections (BSIs) are one of the most common complications of implantable venous ports. The risk factors and pathogens for IVAP-related BSIs are still controversial.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who received IVAPs at a Hospital in Taiwan from January 1, 2011 to June 31, 2014. Two types of venous port, BardPort® 6.6 fr (Bard port) and Autosuture Chemosite® 7.5 fr (TYCO port) were used. All patients with clinically proven venous port-related BSIs were enrolled.

RESULTS

A total of 552 patients were enrolled. There were 34 episodes of IVAP-related BSIs during the study period for a total incidence of 0.177 events/1000 catheter days. Port type (TYCO vs. Bard, HR = 7.105 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.688-29.904), p = 0.0075), age > 65 years (HR = 2.320 (95 % CI, 1.179-4.564), p = 0.0148), and lung cancer (HR = 5.807 (95% CI, 2.946-11.447), p < 0.001) were risk factors for port infections. We also found that no local sign of infection was significantly associated with the growth of gram-negative bacilli (p = 0.031).

CONCLUSIONS

TYCO venous ports, age > 65 years, and lung cancer were all significant risk factors for IVAP-related BSIs, and no sign of infection was significantly associated with the growth of gram-negative bacilli.

摘要

背景

植入式静脉输液港(IVAP)相关血流感染(BSIs)是植入式静脉输液港最常见的并发症之一。IVAP相关BSIs的危险因素和病原体仍存在争议。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2011年1月1日至2014年6月31日在台湾一家医院接受IVAP的所有患者。使用了两种类型的静脉输液港,BardPort® 6.6 fr(巴德输液港)和Autosuture Chemosite® 7.5 fr(泰科输液港)。纳入所有临床确诊的静脉输液港相关BSIs患者。

结果

共纳入552例患者。研究期间发生34例IVAP相关BSIs,总发生率为0.177事件/1000导管日。输液港类型(泰科与巴德,风险比[HR]=7.105(95%置信区间[CI],1.688 - 29.904),p = 0.0075)、年龄>65岁(HR = 2.320(95% CI,1.179 - 4.564),p = 0.0148)和肺癌(HR = 5.807(95% CI,2.946 - 11.447),p < 0.001)是输液港感染的危险因素。我们还发现没有局部感染迹象与革兰氏阴性杆菌生长显著相关(p = 0.031)。

结论

泰科静脉输液港、年龄>65岁和肺癌都是IVAP相关BSIs的重要危险因素,且没有感染迹象与革兰氏阴性杆菌生长显著相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/342f/4588233/486053199c9f/12957_2015_707_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/342f/4588233/486053199c9f/12957_2015_707_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/342f/4588233/486053199c9f/12957_2015_707_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Port type is a possible risk factor for implantable venous access port-related bloodstream infections and no sign of local infection predicts the growth of gram-negative bacilli.端口类型是植入式静脉通路端口相关血流感染的一个可能风险因素,且无局部感染迹象预示革兰氏阴性杆菌的生长。
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep 30;13:288. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0707-2.
2
Incidence and risk factors of infectious complications related to implantable venous-access ports.与植入式静脉输液港相关的感染并发症的发生率及危险因素
Korean J Radiol. 2014 Jul-Aug;15(4):494-500. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2014.15.4.494. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
3
Epidemiology of device-associated infections related to a long-term implantable vascular access device.与长期植入式血管通路装置相关的器械相关感染的流行病学
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999 Mar;20(3):187-91. doi: 10.1086/501609.
4
Implantable venous port-related infections in cancer patients.癌症患者的植入式静脉端口相关感染
Support Care Cancer. 2004 Mar;12(3):197-201. doi: 10.1007/s00520-003-0576-z. Epub 2004 Jan 16.
5
Higher complication risk of totally implantable venous access port systems in patients with advanced cancer - a single institution retrospective analysis.晚期癌症患者使用完全植入式静脉输液港系统的并发症风险更高——单中心回顾性分析。
Palliat Med. 2013 Feb;27(2):185-91. doi: 10.1177/0269216311428777. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
6
Risk factors for central line-associated bloodstream infection in pediatric oncology patients with a totally implantable venous access port: A cohort study.完全植入式静脉输液港的儿科肿瘤患者中心静脉导管相关血流感染的危险因素:一项队列研究。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2017 Feb;64(2):336-342. doi: 10.1002/pbc.26225. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
7
Outcome of totally implantable venous-access port-related infections.完全植入式静脉输液港相关感染的结局
Med Mal Infect. 2016 Feb;46(1):32-8. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2015.12.006. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
8
Predictors of catheter-related gram-negative bacilli bacteraemia among cancer patients.癌症患者导管相关革兰氏阴性杆菌菌血症的预测因素。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011 Nov;17(11):1711-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03504.x. Epub 2011 May 20.
9
Incidence and risk factors for central venous access port-related infection in Chinese cancer patients.中国癌症患者中心静脉通路港相关感染的发生率及危险因素
J Formos Med Assoc. 2015 Nov;114(11):1055-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2015.06.013. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
10
Epidemiology and risk factors for bloodstream infections in a home parenteral nutrition program.家庭肠外营养计划中血流感染的流行病学及危险因素
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2015 Feb;39(2):147-53. doi: 10.1177/0148607113502361. Epub 2013 Sep 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Psychological experiences and needs of tumor patients with implanted intravenous infusion ports: a qualitative study.植入式静脉输液港肿瘤患者的心理体验与需求:一项质性研究
Front Oncol. 2024 May 16;14:1392416. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1392416. eCollection 2024.
2
Silver-Mixed Port Reduces Venous Access Port Related Infection Rate Compared to Non-Silver-mixed Port: A Single-center Retrospective Analysis.银混合端口比非银混合端口降低静脉接入端口相关感染率:一项单中心回顾性分析。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023 Dec;46(12):1696-1702. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03583-y. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
3
Port implantation-related bloodstream infection caused by : A case report.

本文引用的文献

1
Incidence and risk factors of infectious complications related to implantable venous-access ports.与植入式静脉输液港相关的感染并发症的发生率及危险因素
Korean J Radiol. 2014 Jul-Aug;15(4):494-500. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2014.15.4.494. Epub 2014 Jul 9.
2
A case-control study to identify risk factors for totally implantable central venous port-related bloodstream infection.一项病例对照研究,旨在确定全植入式中心静脉港相关血流感染的危险因素。
Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Jul;46(3):250-60. doi: 10.4143/crt.2014.46.3.250. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
3
Bloodstream infections in patients with solid tumors: epidemiology, antibiotic therapy, and outcomes in 528 episodes in a single cancer center.
由端口植入相关的血流感染:一例报告。
Curr Med Mycol. 2023 Mar;9(1):32-35. doi: 10.18502/CMM.2023.150671.
4
Safety of immediate use of totally implantable venous access ports in adult patients with cancer: a retrospective single-center study.成年癌症患者立即使用完全植入式静脉输液港的安全性:一项回顾性单中心研究。
Korean J Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec;17(2):104-110. doi: 10.14216/kjco.21016. Epub 2021 Dec 31.
5
Bedside ultrasound as a screening test for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBI).床旁超声作为导管相关性血流感染(CRBI)诊断的筛查试验。
J Ultrasound. 2022 Mar;25(1):1-7. doi: 10.1007/s40477-020-00538-8. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
6
Arterio-venous fistula-expanding role for venous access in mastocytosis patients.动静脉瘘在肥大细胞增多症患者静脉通路中的扩展作用。
J Surg Case Rep. 2019 Feb 19;2019(2):rjz053. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjz053. eCollection 2019 Feb.
7
Role of Lock Therapy for Long-Term Catheter-Related Infections by Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria.多药耐药菌所致长期导管相关性感染的封管治疗作用。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Aug 27;62(9). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00569-18. Print 2018 Sep.
8
Removal of totally implanted venous access ports for suspected infection in the intensive care unit: a multicenter observational study.重症监护病房中因疑似感染而移除完全植入式静脉通路端口:一项多中心观察性研究。
Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Mar 27;8(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0383-9.
实体瘤患者的血流感染:单一癌症中心528例病例的流行病学、抗生素治疗及转归
Medicine (Baltimore). 2014 May;93(3):143-149. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000026.
4
Risk factors for venous port migration in a single institute in Taiwan.台湾某单一机构中静脉留置针移位的危险因素。
World J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jan 14;12:15. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-15.
5
Ultrasound and fluoroscopy-guided placement of central venous ports via internal jugular vein: retrospective analysis of 1254 port implantations at a single center.超声和透视引导下经颈内静脉中央静脉置管:单中心 1254 例置管的回顾性分析。
Korean J Radiol. 2012 May-Jun;13(3):314-23. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2012.13.3.314. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
6
Update on totally implantable venous access devices.完全植入式静脉通路装置的最新进展。
Surg Oncol. 2012 Sep;21(3):207-15. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2012.02.003. Epub 2012 Mar 17.
7
Frequent accesses to totally implanted vascular ports in pediatric oncology patients are associated with higher infection rates.儿科肿瘤患者频繁使用完全植入式血管通路端口与较高的感染率相关。
J Vasc Access. 2011 Jul-Sep;12(3):207-10. doi: 10.5301/JVA.2011.6258.
8
Safety and effectiveness of central venous catheterization in patients with cancer: prospective observational study.癌症患者中心静脉置管的安全性和有效性:前瞻性观察研究。
J Korean Med Sci. 2010 Dec;25(12):1748-53. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2010.25.12.1748. Epub 2010 Nov 24.
9
Complications associated with the use of Port-a-Caths in patients with malignant or haematological disease: a single-centre prospective analysis.恶性血液病患者使用 Port-a-Cath 相关并发症:单中心前瞻性分析。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2010 Sep;19(5):676-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2009.01115.x. Epub 2009 Aug 25.
10
Infectious port complications are more frequent in younger patients with hematologic malignancies than in solid tumor patients.与实体瘤患者相比,血液系统恶性肿瘤的年轻患者发生感染性端口并发症的情况更为常见。
Oncology. 2008;74(3-4):237-44. doi: 10.1159/000151393. Epub 2008 Aug 21.