Suppr超能文献

比卡鲁胺与氟他胺在晚期前列腺癌患者联合雄激素阻断治疗中的临床疗效比较:一项双盲、随机、多中心试验的最终报告。康士得联合研究组

Clinical benefits of bicalutamide compared with flutamide in combined androgen blockade for patients with advanced prostatic carcinoma: final report of a double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial. Casodex Combination Study Group.

作者信息

Schellhammer P F, Sharifi R, Block N L, Soloway M S, Venner P M, Patterson A L, Sarosdy M F, Vogelzang N J, Schellenger J J, Kolvenbag G J

机构信息

Department of Urology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk 23507-1999, USA.

出版信息

Urology. 1997 Sep;50(3):330-6. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00279-3.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and tolerability of bicalutamide and flutamide, each combined with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogue (LHRH-A) therapy, in patients with metastatic (Stage D2) prostate cancer.

METHODS

This was a randomized, double-blind (for antiandrogen therapy), multicenter study with a two-by-two factorial design. Eight hundred thirteen patients were allocated 1:1 to bicalutamide (50 mg once daily) and flutamide (250 mg three times daily) and 2:1 to goserelin acetate (3.6 mg every 28 days) and leuprolide acetate (7.5 mg every 28 days).

RESULTS

The median times to progression and death were 97 and 180 weeks for the bicalutamide plus LHRH-A group compared with 77 and 148 weeks for the flutamide plus LHRH-A group. The hazard ratio for time to progression for bicalutamide plus LHRH-A to flutamide plus LHRH-A was 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79 to 1.10, P = 0.41) and that for survival time was 0.87 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.05, P = 0.15). The therapies were generally well tolerated. The most common adverse event in the two groups was hot flashes. The incidence of hematuria was significantly higher for the bicalutamide plus LHRH-A group than for the flutamide plus LHRH-A group (12% versus 6%, P = 0.007), but no patient withdrew from therapy because of hematuria. There was a significantly (26% versus 12%, P < 0.001) higher incidence of diarrhea and more withdrawals for diarrhea (25 patients versus 2) for the flutamide plus LHRH-A group relative to the bicalutamide plus LHRH-A group.

CONCLUSIONS

With a median follow-up time of 160 weeks, the combination of bicalutamide plus LHRH-A was well tolerated and had equivalent time to progression and survival compared with flutamide plus LHRH-A. Treatment with bicalutamide plus LHRH-A resulted in longer median survival than treatment with flutamide plus LHRH-A.

摘要

目的

比较比卡鲁胺和氟他胺分别联合促黄体生成素释放激素类似物(LHRH-A)治疗转移性(D2期)前列腺癌患者的疗效和耐受性。

方法

这是一项采用二乘二析因设计的随机、双盲(抗雄激素治疗方面)、多中心研究。813例患者按1:1分配至比卡鲁胺(每日一次,每次50毫克)和氟他胺(每日三次,每次250毫克)组,按2:1分配至醋酸戈舍瑞林(每28天3.6毫克)和醋酸亮丙瑞林(每28天7.5毫克)组。

结果

比卡鲁胺联合LHRH-A组的疾病进展和死亡中位时间分别为97周和180周,而氟他胺联合LHRH-A组分别为77周和148周。比卡鲁胺联合LHRH-A组与氟他胺联合LHRH-A组的疾病进展时间风险比为0.93(95%置信区间[CI]0.79至1.10,P = 0.41),生存时间风险比为0.87(95%CI 0.72至1.05,P = 0.15)。这些治疗总体耐受性良好。两组中最常见的不良事件是潮热。比卡鲁胺联合LHRH-A组血尿发生率显著高于氟他胺联合LHRH-A组(12%对6%,P = 0.007),但没有患者因血尿退出治疗。氟他胺联合LHRH-A组腹泻发生率显著高于比卡鲁胺联合LHRH-A组(26%对12%,P < 0.001),且因腹泻退出治疗的患者更多(25例对2例)。

结论

中位随访时间为160周时,比卡鲁胺联合LHRH-A耐受性良好,与氟他胺联合LHRH-A相比,疾病进展时间和生存时间相当。比卡鲁胺联合LHRH-A治疗的中位生存期长于氟他胺联合LHRH-A治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验