Suppr超能文献

[关于毛细血管外血流型氧合器的研发研究——与HF - 4000、Capiox II和Silox的比较]

[Study about development of extracapillary blood flow type oxygenator--comparison with HF-4000, Capiox II, and Silox].

作者信息

Ishii Y, Ohmori K, Sezai Y

出版信息

Rinsho Kyobu Geka. 1989 Feb;9(1):69-74.

PMID:9301901
Abstract

Results about comparison of new extracapillary blood flow type polypropylene hollow fiber oxygenator (PHO) with HF-4000, Capiox II and Silox for effects on blood components, hemolysis, immunoglobulin and high molecular weight proteins, such as complements: 1) Platelet protection was about equal. Silox was best in leucocyte protection. 2) PHO was superior to HF-4000. The extracapillary type was better for hemolysis. 3) Silox was best in immunoglobulin protection. Effect on C3 and C4 was equal, and Silox was best in protection of CH50. Slight differences were caused by silicone membrane, not caused by blood flow type. 4) PHO was superior to HF-4000 (commercial extracapillary type), and almost equal to Capiox II (intracapillary type).

摘要

新型毛细血管外血流型聚丙烯中空纤维氧合器(PHO)与HF - 4000、Capiox II和Silox在对血液成分、溶血、免疫球蛋白和高分子量蛋白质(如补体)影响方面的比较结果:1)血小板保护作用大致相当。Silox在白细胞保护方面最佳。2)PHO优于HF - 4000。毛细血管外类型对溶血更有利。3)Silox在免疫球蛋白保护方面最佳。对C3和C4的影响相当,Silox在CH50保护方面最佳。差异轻微是由硅膜引起,而非血流类型。4)PHO优于HF - 4000(商用毛细血管外类型),且几乎与Capiox II(毛细血管内类型)相当。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验