Suppr超能文献

儿童中枢神经系统肿瘤后的学校行为与健康状况

School behaviour and health status after central nervous system tumours in childhood.

作者信息

Glaser A W, Abdul Rashid N F, U C L, Walker D A

机构信息

Department of Child Health, University of Nottingham, Queens Medical Centre, UK.

出版信息

Br J Cancer. 1997;76(5):643-50. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1997.439.

Abstract

This study was designed to assess the overall morbidity burden of survival from central nervous system (CNS) tumours and its impact on return to a normal lifestyle. School behaviour and health status of 27 children after treatment for CNS tumours, of 25 of their school-aged siblings, plus age- and sex-matched controls is reported. Spinetta school behaviour, Lansky play-performance and Health Utilities Index (mark II and III) assessments have been made. Patients had reduced mobility and increased pain levels. They demonstrated a reluctance to participate in organized physical activities. Impaired cognition, emotion and self-esteem were reported. They worried more than controls but attended school willingly, interacted normally with their peers and viewed the future confidently. Their siblings were reluctant to express openly concern for others or feelings of joy. Teachers were reliable proxies for most attributes, notable exceptions being speech and emotion. This is the first study to have assessed the school behaviour of a cohort solely composed of survivors of childhood CNS tumours. The good social reintegration is reassuring and likely to reflect a high level of psychosocial support. However, the results presented identify these young people as a 'special educational needs' group as defined by the 1981 and 1993 Education Acts.

摘要

本研究旨在评估中枢神经系统(CNS)肿瘤幸存者的总体发病负担及其对恢复正常生活方式的影响。报告了27名接受CNS肿瘤治疗后的儿童、25名学龄期同胞兄弟姐妹以及年龄和性别匹配的对照组的学校行为和健康状况。进行了斯皮内塔学校行为、兰斯基游戏表现和健康效用指数(第二版和第三版)评估。患者活动能力下降,疼痛程度增加。他们表现出不愿参加有组织的体育活动。据报告存在认知、情感和自尊受损的情况。他们比对照组更焦虑,但愿意上学,与同龄人正常互动,并对未来充满信心。他们的兄弟姐妹不愿公开表达对他人的关心或喜悦之情。对于大多数特征,教师是可靠的代理人,但言语和情感方面明显例外。这是第一项评估仅由儿童CNS肿瘤幸存者组成的队列的学校行为的研究。良好的社会重新融入令人放心,可能反映了高水平的心理社会支持。然而,所呈现的结果将这些年轻人确定为1981年和1993年《教育法》所定义的“特殊教育需求”群体。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

9
Measuring quality of life in paediatric patients.测量儿科患者的生活质量。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Dec;16(6):605-25. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199916060-00002.
10
Clinical management of brain stem glioma.脑干胶质瘤的临床管理
Arch Dis Child. 1999 Jun;80(6):558-64. doi: 10.1136/adc.80.6.558.

本文引用的文献

2
Multi-attribute preference functions. Health Utilities Index.多属性偏好函数。健康效用指数。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1995 Jun;7(6):503-20. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199507060-00005.
4
Quality of quality-of-life data.生活质量数据的质量
Lancet. 1996 Aug 17;348(9025):421-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)64534-5.
5
Returning to primary school after treatment for cancer.
Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 1994 Jan-Feb;11(1):105-9. doi: 10.3109/08880019409141907.
6
Assessment of health status in survivors of cancer.癌症幸存者健康状况评估
Arch Dis Child. 1994 Mar;70(3):200-4. doi: 10.1136/adc.70.3.200.
10
Siblings of a child with cancer.患癌儿童的兄弟姐妹。
Child Care Health Dev. 1994 Sep-Oct;20(5):309-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.1994.tb00393.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验