Tong M J, Reddy K R, Lee W M, Pockros P J, Hoefs J C, Keeffe E B, Hollinger F B, Hathcote E J, White H, Foust R T, Jensen D M, Krawitt E L, Fromm H, Black M, Blatt L M, Klein M, Lubina J
Huntington Memorial Hospital, Pasadena, CA 91105, USA.
Hepatology. 1997 Sep;26(3):747-54. doi: 10.1002/hep.510260330.
This multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind, phase III study in 704 patients with chronic hepatitis C infection compared treatment with consensus interferon (CIFN), a non-natural recombinant type-1 interferon, with a standard regimen of recombinant interferon alfa-2b (IFN-alpha2b). Patients were randomized to receive CIFN at doses of 3 microg or 9 microg, or 15 microg IFN-alpha2b (3 million units), subcutaneously three times weekly for 24 weeks, followed by 24 weeks of observation. Efficacy was assessed by normalization of serum alanine transaminase (ALT) concentration and decrease in serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA concentration below the limit of detection by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (100 copies/mL). The beneficial effect of CIFN was greater with the 9-microg dose than the 3-microg dose. The sustained ALT and HCV RNA response rates were 20.3% and 12.1%, respectively, in the 9-microg CIFN cohort and 19.6% and 11.3%, respectively, in the 15-microg IFN-alpha2b cohort. However, patients receiving 9 microg of CIFN had a greater reduction in serum HCV RNA concentrations compared with patients receiving 15 microg IFN-alpha2b over the course of treatment (P < .01). Similarly, analysis of patients infected with HCV genotype 1 showed a greater reduction in serum HCV RNA concentration over the course of treatment for the 9-microg CIFN group when compared with the 15-microg IFN-alpha2b group (P < .01). In addition, a greater percentage of patients infected with HCV genotype 1 treated with 9 microg CIFN had undetectable HCV RNA concentrations when compared with patients in the 15-microg IFN-alpha2b cohort at the end of treatment (24% vs. 15%; P = .04). Improvements in liver histology were noted in all three treatment groups; 52% to 55% of the patients in the three cohorts had at least a 2-unit improvement in the Knodell score at the end of the posttreatment period. The adverse-events profiles were characteristic of treatment with type-1 interferon, and the incidences of anti-interferon antibody formation did not significantly differ among the three treatment groups. These results show that administration of 9 microg CIFN three times weekly for 6 months is safe and is effective in reducing serum HCV RNA concentration.
这项针对704例慢性丙型肝炎感染患者的多中心、随机、对照、双盲III期研究,将共识干扰素(CIFN,一种非天然重组1型干扰素)与重组干扰素α-2b(IFN-α2b)标准方案进行了比较。患者被随机分配接受3微克、9微克或15微克IFN-α2b(300万单位)剂量的CIFN,皮下注射,每周3次,共24周,随后进行24周观察。通过血清丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)浓度正常化以及血清丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)RNA浓度降至逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测下限(100拷贝/毫升)以下来评估疗效。9微克剂量的CIFN的有益效果比3微克剂量的更大。在9微克CIFN组中,持续ALT和HCV RNA应答率分别为20.3%和12.1%,在15微克IFN-α2b组中分别为19.6%和11.3%。然而,在治疗过程中,接受9微克CIFN的患者血清HCV RNA浓度的降低幅度大于接受15微克IFN-α2b的患者(P <.01)。同样,对感染HCV基因1型的患者分析显示,与15微克IFN-α2b组相比,9微克CIFN组在治疗过程中血清HCV RNA浓度降低幅度更大(P <.01)。此外,与治疗结束时15微克IFN-α2b组的患者相比,接受9微克CIFN治疗的感染HCV基因1型的患者中有更高比例的患者HCV RNA浓度检测不到(24%对15%;P =.04)。所有三个治疗组均观察到肝脏组织学改善;三个队列中52%至55%的患者在治疗后期末Knodell评分至少提高2分。不良事件特征为1型干扰素治疗的特征,三个治疗组中抗干扰素抗体形成的发生率无显著差异。这些结果表明,每周3次给予9微克CIFN,持续6个月是安全的,并且在降低血清HCV RNA浓度方面是有效的。