Everson G T, Jensen D M, Craig J R, van Leeuwen D J, Bain V G, Ehrinpreis M N, Albert D, Joh T, Witt K
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO, USA.
Hepatology. 1999 Jul;30(1):271-6. doi: 10.1002/hep.510300116.
Chronic hepatitis C patients (472 patients) were treated with consensus interferon (CIFN) or interferon (IFN) alfa-2b for 6 months in a large multicenter trial. Efficacy was assessed by clearance of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (<100 copies/mL), normalization of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and histological improvement. The purpose of these analyses was to compare these efficacy parameters in nonfibrotics, fibrotics, and cirrhotics. Patients with chronic HCV and cirrhosis showed the same benefit from IFN treatment as noncirrhotic patients when efficacy was assessed by clearance of serum HCV RNA or by histological benefit. Sustained HCV RNA response rates were similar when measured among nonfibrotic (11%), fibrotic (13%), and cirrhotic (11%) patients. Improvement in histologic activity index (HAI) scores was noted among all 3 groups. Cirrhotic patients had a lower sustained ALT response rate (12%) than did nonfibrotic patients (23%). Ninety percent of nonfibrotics, but only 71% of fibrotics and 67% of cirrhotics, who sustained a virological response normalized their ALT. This suggests that cirrhotic patients may clear the hepatitis C virus without normalization of ALT levels. The pattern of both HCV RNA clearance over time and ALT decrease was similar among nonfibrotics, fibrotics, and cirrhotics. Tolerability to IFN therapy was similar among the 3 groups except that more cirrhotics required dose reduction because of thrombocytopenia. In patients with cirrhosis, ALT levels may be a less appropriate endpoint in the measurement of response to therapy. We conclude that liver cirrhosis should not be a reason for excluding patients from therapy because both cirrhotic and fibrotic HCV patients benefit from IFN therapy not only by clearance of virus but by improvements in liver histology.
在一项大型多中心试验中,472例慢性丙型肝炎患者接受了共识干扰素(CIFN)或干扰素(IFN)α-2b治疗6个月。通过逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)RNA清除情况(<100拷贝/mL)、血清丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)正常化以及组织学改善来评估疗效。这些分析的目的是比较非纤维化、纤维化和肝硬化患者的这些疗效参数。当通过血清HCV RNA清除或组织学获益评估疗效时,慢性HCV和肝硬化患者与非肝硬化患者从IFN治疗中获得的益处相同。在非纤维化(11%)、纤维化(13%)和肝硬化(11%)患者中测量时,持续HCV RNA应答率相似。所有3组患者的组织学活动指数(HAI)评分均有改善。肝硬化患者的持续ALT应答率(12%)低于非纤维化患者(23%)。在实现病毒学应答的患者中,90%的非纤维化患者ALT正常化,但纤维化患者和肝硬化患者分别只有71%和67%。这表明肝硬化患者可能在ALT水平未正常化的情况下清除丙型肝炎病毒。非纤维化、纤维化和肝硬化患者HCV RNA随时间的清除模式以及ALT下降模式相似。3组患者对IFN治疗的耐受性相似,只是更多肝硬化患者因血小板减少需要减少剂量。在肝硬化患者中,ALT水平可能不是评估治疗反应的合适终点。我们得出结论,肝硬化不应成为将患者排除在治疗之外的理由,因为纤维化和肝硬化的HCV患者不仅通过病毒清除,还通过肝脏组织学改善从IFN治疗中获益。