Fehring R J
Marquette University College of Nursing Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201-1881, USA.
J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 1996 Oct;8(10):461-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.1996.tb00604.x.
The purpose of this study was to compare the CUE Ovulation Predictor with the ovulation method in determining the fertile period. Eleven regularly ovulating women measured their salivary and vaginal electrical resistance (ER) with the CUE, observed their cervical-vaginal mucus, and measured their urine for a luteinizing hormone (LH) surge on a daily basis. Data from 21 menstrual cycles showed no statistical difference (T = 0.33, p = 0.63) between the CUE fertile period, which ranged from 5 to 10 days (mean = 6.7 days, SD = 1.6), and the fertile period of the ovulation method, which ranged from 4 to 9 days (mean = 6.5 days, SD = 2.0). The CUE has potential as an adjunctive device in the learning and use of natural family planning methods.
本研究的目的是比较CUE排卵预测仪与排卵法在确定排卵期方面的效果。11名规律排卵的女性每天使用CUE测量唾液和阴道电阻（ER），观察宫颈阴道黏液，并检测尿液中的促黄体生成素（LH）峰值。来自21个月经周期的数据显示，CUE排卵期（5至10天，平均 = 6.7天，标准差 = 1.6）与排卵法排卵期（4至9天，平均 = 6.5天，标准差 = 2.0）之间无统计学差异（T = 0.33，p = 0.63）。CUE有潜力作为自然计划生育方法学习和使用中的辅助工具。
