• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肾细胞癌继发骨转移的预后因素及外科治疗

Prognostic factors and surgical treatment of osseous metastases secondary to renal cell carcinoma.

作者信息

Althausen P, Althausen A, Jennings L C, Mankin H J

机构信息

Orthopaedic Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 1997 Sep 15;80(6):1103-9.

PMID:9305711
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to analyze the survival of 38 cases of metastatic renal cell carcinoma with secondary osseous metastases treated at the Orthopaedic Oncology Unit of the Massachusetts General Hospital. The survival was analyzed because it seemed to be considerably longer than any reported previously in the literature.

METHODS

Survival was analyzed with respect to age, gender, site of primary tumor, presence of pathologic fracture, disease free interval, initial presentation with metastasis, solitary versus multiple metastases, and axial versus appendicular metastases.

RESULTS

Survival for the entire group was 90% at 6 months, 84% at 1 year, 55% at 5 years, and 39% at 10 years. Age, gender, and presence of pathologic fracture had no influence on survival. Presentation without metastases, long disease free interval between nephrectomy and first metastases, appendicular skeletal location, and solitary metastases were all correlated with longer survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In the authors' view, patients with the characteristics correlated with longer survival are appropriate candidates for aggressive surgical resection of bone metastasis.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在分析麻省总医院骨肿瘤科室收治的38例发生继发性骨转移的转移性肾细胞癌患者的生存情况。对生存情况进行分析是因为其似乎比以往文献报道的要长得多。

方法

从年龄、性别、原发肿瘤部位、病理性骨折情况、无病间期、初次出现转移的情况、单发与多发转移以及轴向与附属骨骼转移等方面对生存情况进行分析。

结果

整个组6个月时的生存率为90%,1年时为84%,5年时为55%,10年时为39%。年龄、性别和病理性骨折情况对生存无影响。初次就诊时无转移、肾切除与首次转移之间的无病间期长、附属骨骼部位以及单发转移均与较长的生存期相关。

结论

作者认为,具有与较长生存期相关特征的患者适合积极手术切除骨转移灶。

相似文献

1
Prognostic factors and surgical treatment of osseous metastases secondary to renal cell carcinoma.肾细胞癌继发骨转移的预后因素及外科治疗
Cancer. 1997 Sep 15;80(6):1103-9.
2
Treatment of osseous metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma.肾细胞癌患者骨转移的治疗
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Apr(409):223-31. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000059580.08469.3e.
3
Surgical treatment of osseous metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma.肾细胞癌患者骨转移的外科治疗
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999 Oct(367):283-90.
4
Prognostic factors and survival after pulmonary resection of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.转移性肾细胞癌肺切除术后的预后因素与生存情况
Eur Urol. 2005 Jul;48(1):77-81; discussion 81-2. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.03.004. Epub 2005 Mar 20.
5
The therapeutic value of adrenalectomy in case of solitary metastatic spread originating from primary renal cell cancer.肾上腺切除术对原发性肾细胞癌孤立性转移扩散病例的治疗价值。
Eur Urol. 2005 Aug;48(2):252-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.04.004. Epub 2005 Apr 21.
6
[Evaluation of bone metastases from renal cell carcinoma].[肾细胞癌骨转移的评估]
Hinyokika Kiyo. 2001 Mar;47(3):155-8.
7
Survival after complete surgical resection of multiple metastases from renal cell carcinoma.肾细胞癌多发转移完全手术后的生存情况。
Cancer. 2011 Jul 1;117(13):2873-82. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25836. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
8
Survival and prognostic classification of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma of bone.骨转移性肾细胞癌患者的生存及预后分类
Eur Urol. 2007 Jul;52(1):163-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.10.060. Epub 2006 Nov 7.
9
Renal cell carcinoma lung metastases surgery: pathologic findings and prognostic factors.肾细胞癌肺转移瘤手术:病理结果及预后因素
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Oct;84(4):1114-20. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.04.118.
10
Treatment and survival of osseous renal cell carcinoma metastases.骨转移肾细胞癌的治疗与生存。
J Surg Oncol. 2012 Dec;106(7):850-5. doi: 10.1002/jso.23134. Epub 2012 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
The prognostic role of key factors in renal cell carcinoma with bone metastases.关键因素在肾细胞癌骨转移中的预后作用。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Aug 2;26(1):746. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-09021-z.
2
Metastatic Temporal Bone Tumor From Renal Cell Carcinoma Coexisting With Sphenoid Ridge Meningioma: A Case Report.肾细胞癌转移性颞骨肿瘤合并蝶骨嵴脑膜瘤:一例报告
Cureus. 2024 Nov 7;16(11):e73198. doi: 10.7759/cureus.73198. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer Instigating Paraplegia in a Male Patient.男性患者转移性肾细胞癌引发截瘫
Cureus. 2022 Jul 9;14(7):e26696. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26696. eCollection 2022 Jul.
4
Supportive therapy and complementary medicine in renal cell carcinoma.支持性治疗和补充医学在肾细胞癌中的应用。
World J Urol. 2022 Oct;40(10):2359-2371. doi: 10.1007/s00345-021-03885-1. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
5
Distal Fibular Reconstruction Using Iliac Grafting and Emslie-Vidal's Ligamentoplasty after Exeresis of Single Renal Carcinoma Metastasis.单发性肾癌转移灶切除术后采用髂骨移植及埃姆斯利-维达尔韧带成形术进行腓骨远端重建
Case Rep Orthop. 2020 Feb 27;2020:8246313. doi: 10.1155/2020/8246313. eCollection 2020.
6
Perioperative Considerations in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma.转移性肾细胞癌的围手术期注意事项
Rev Urol. 2016;18(3):133-142. doi: 10.3909/riu0697.
7
Does the onset of bone metastasis in sunitinib-treated renal cell carcinoma patients impact the overall survival?舒尼替尼治疗的肾细胞癌患者发生骨转移是否会影响总生存期?
World J Urol. 2016 Jul;34(7):909-15. doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1707-0. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
8
Bone metastases affect prognosis but not effectiveness of third-line targeted therapies in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.骨转移影响转移性肾细胞癌患者的预后,但不影响三线靶向治疗的疗效。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Jul-Aug;9(7-8):263-7. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2377.
9
Integrating metastasectomy and stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.在转移性肾细胞癌治疗中整合转移灶切除术和立体定向放射治疗
EJC Suppl. 2013 Sep;11(2):192-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcsup.2013.07.017.
10
Is there a role for systemic targeted therapy after surgical treatment for metastases of renal cell carcinoma?肾细胞癌转移灶手术治疗后全身靶向治疗是否有作用?
World J Nephrol. 2015 May 6;4(2):254-62. doi: 10.5527/wjn.v4.i2.254.