Rothschild M A, Schneider V
Department of Legal Medicine, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany.
Forensic Sci Int. 1997 Sep 19;89(1-2):57-64. doi: 10.1016/s0379-0738(97)00112-6.
During an initial investigation, postmortem scavenging by pets (dogs, cats, etc.), which sometimes occurs, may sometimes lead to the suspicion that a crime has been committed. In most cases however, the death was due to natural causes. The time of the onset of postmortem scavenging by animals can often not be exactly determined because the interval between the time of death and discovery of the body is usually considerable. In this paper we deal with the case of a 31-year-old man, who committed suicide by shooting himself in the mouth and whose face exhibited extensive postmortem animal bite marks caused by the victim's Alsatian, which must have occurred during the 45 minute period between the fatal shot and the discovery of the body. Hunger, frequently discussed as a reason for postmortem animal mutilating injuries, could not have been responsible for the injuries in this case. In the room where the victim was found, there was also a bowl with sufficient dog food and while being transported to an animal sanctuary in a police van the dog vomited about 400 g of dog food as well as human tissue.
在初步调查期间,有时会发生宠物(狗、猫等)对尸体的死后啃食,这有时可能会引发犯罪嫌疑。然而在大多数情况下,死亡是由自然原因导致的。动物死后啃食开始的时间通常无法精确确定,因为死亡时间与尸体被发现的时间间隔通常较长。在本文中,我们处理的是一名31岁男子的案件,他开枪自杀,子弹击中口腔,其面部有大量死后动物咬痕,是受害者的阿尔萨斯犬所为,咬痕肯定是在致命枪击后到尸体被发现的45分钟内出现的。经常被讨论作为死后动物残害损伤原因的饥饿,在本案中不可能是造成这些损伤的原因。在发现受害者的房间里,有一碗足够的狗粮,而且在被警车运往动物收容所的途中,这只狗吐出了约400克狗粮以及人体组织。