Chaves J F, Dworkin S F
Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis 46202-5186, USA.
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 1997 Oct;45(4):356-76. doi: 10.1080/00207149708416138.
Hypnotic analgesia has occupied a pivotal place in experimental and clinical hypnosis. It emerged early in the 19th century when effective clinical techniques for pain management had not yet developed, and the relief of pain and suffering had not even become a well-defined social goal. Its acceptance was further complicated by political struggles surrounding the humanitarian transformation of medicine during this era as well as a redefinition of the physician-patient relationship that wrested control from the patient. The initial struggle for professional acceptance was won only when the debate became almost entirely localized within the professional community. Acceptance of hypnosis by professional organizations has been followed by alternating periods of interest and indifference. While the evidence for the powerful effects of suggestion and related variables has often been observed and reported in nonhypnotic contexts, their relationship to hypnotic phenomena has often not been appreciated. Since the mid-20th century, scientific information about hypnotic analgesia has grown substantially and has had significant influence on strategies for acute and chronic pain management. If recent calls for its wider application in pain management are to succeed, it will require additional data from clinical populations and a balanced and scientifically prudent approach by its advocates.
催眠镇痛在实验性和临床催眠中占据着关键地位。它在19世纪早期出现,当时有效的疼痛管理临床技术尚未发展起来,减轻疼痛和痛苦甚至尚未成为一个明确的社会目标。在这个时代,围绕医学人道主义变革的政治斗争以及医患关系的重新定义(这种重新定义从患者手中夺走了控制权),使得催眠镇痛的被接受变得更加复杂。只有当这场辩论几乎完全局限于专业领域内时,专业认可的最初斗争才取得胜利。专业组织对催眠的认可之后是兴趣期和冷漠期的交替。虽然在非催眠情境中经常观察到并报告暗示及相关变量的强大作用的证据,但它们与催眠现象的关系却常常未得到重视。自20世纪中叶以来,关于催眠镇痛的科学信息大幅增长,并对急性和慢性疼痛管理策略产生了重大影响。如果近期关于其在疼痛管理中更广泛应用的呼吁要取得成功,将需要来自临床人群的更多数据,以及其倡导者采取平衡且科学审慎的方法。