Laden F, Spiegelman D, Neas L M, Colditz G A, Hankinson S E, Manson J E, Byrne C, Rosner B A, Speizer F E, Hunter D J
Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997 Sep 17;89(18):1373-8. doi: 10.1093/jnci/89.18.1373.
Breast cancer mortality and incidence rates vary by geographic region in the United States. Previous analytic studies have measured mortality, not incidence, and have used regional prevalences to control for geographic variation in risk factors rather than adjusting for risk factors measured at the level of the individual. We prospectively evaluated regional variation in breast cancer incidence rates in the Nurses' Health Study and assessed the influence of breast cancer risk factors measured at the individual level.
The Nurses' Health Study cohort was established in 1976 when 121700 female nurses aged 30-55 years living in 11 U.S. states were enrolled. These states represent all four regions of the continental United States. We identified 3603 incident cases of invasive breast cancer through 1992 (1794565 person-years of follow-up). We calculated relative risks (RRs) adjusted for age and for age and established risk factors (i.e., multivariate-adjusted analysis), comparing California, the Northeast, and the Midwest with the South.
For premenopausal women, there was little evidence of regional variation in breast cancer incidence rates, either in age-adjusted or in multivariate-adjusted analyses. For postmenopausal women in California, age-adjusted risk was modestly elevated (RR = 1.24; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.05-1.47); after adjusting for age and for established risk factors, the excess rate in California was attenuated by 25% (RR = 1.18; 95% CI = 1.00-1.40). No excess of breast cancer incidence was observed for postmenopausal women in either the Northeast or the Midwest.
Little regional variation in age-adjusted breast cancer incidence rates was observed, with the exception of a modest excess for postmenopausal women in California. Adjustment for differences in the distribution of established risk factors explained some of the excess risk in California.
在美国,乳腺癌的死亡率和发病率因地理区域而异。以往的分析研究测量的是死亡率而非发病率,并且使用区域患病率来控制风险因素的地理差异,而非对个体层面测量的风险因素进行调整。我们前瞻性地评估了护士健康研究中乳腺癌发病率的区域差异,并评估了个体层面测量的乳腺癌风险因素的影响。
护士健康研究队列于1976年建立,当时招募了居住在美国11个州的121700名年龄在30 - 55岁的女性护士。这些州代表了美国大陆的所有四个地区。通过1992年(1794565人年的随访),我们确定了3603例浸润性乳腺癌的发病病例。我们计算了调整年龄以及年龄和既定风险因素后的相对风险(RRs)(即多变量调整分析),将加利福尼亚州、东北部和中西部与南部进行比较。
对于绝经前女性,无论是年龄调整分析还是多变量调整分析,几乎没有证据表明乳腺癌发病率存在区域差异。对于加利福尼亚州的绝经后女性,年龄调整后的风险略有升高(RR = 1.24;95%置信区间[CI] = 1.05 - 1.47);在调整年龄和既定风险因素后,加利福尼亚州的超额发病率降低了25%(RR = 1.18;95% CI = 1.00 - 1.40)。在东北部或中西部的绝经后女性中未观察到乳腺癌发病率的超额情况。
除了加利福尼亚州绝经后女性略有超额外,年龄调整后的乳腺癌发病率几乎没有区域差异。对既定风险因素分布差异的调整解释了加利福尼亚州的部分超额风险。