Risquez F, Pennehoaut G, McCorvey R, Love B, Vazquez A, Partamian J, Rebon P, Lucena E, Audebert A, Confino E
Centro Medico Docente La Trinidad, Caracas, Venezuela.
Hum Reprod. 1997 Aug;12(8):1645-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.8.1645.
Microlaparoscopes have been evaluated for minimally invasive laparoscopy using minimal anaesthesia or analgesia since our preliminary report on microlaparoscopy in 1993. This international multicentre report of safety and efficacy of diagnostic and operative microlaparoscopy was completed to evaluate the role of microlaparoscopy in a wide spectrum of gynaecological indications, diagnoses of pelvic and tubal disease, tubal occlusion and assisted reproduction. A total of 408 patients from seven centres around the world were included in this report. Of the 164 patients who underwent microlaparoscopy under local analgesia only three patients (1.8%) converted to i.v. sedation because of pain intolerance. All 71 patients who underwent microlaparoscopy under i.v. sedation as planned tolerated the procedure with acceptable pain level perception. Only one abdominal wall minor bleeding and one uterine wall minor bleeding were recorded in the remaining 173 patients who underwent microlaparoscopy under general anaesthesia. Visualization of the pelvic organs was sufficient in all 408 cases for diagnosis and treatment of selected pelvic pathology. We concluded, based on this sizeable microlaparoscopy series, that this outpatient procedure can replace large diameter laparoscopy for diagnosis and treatment of various pelvic conditions. Microlaparoscopy can safely replace large diameter laparoscopy in motivated patients who require minor operative procedures such as tubal occlusion, minor adhesiolysis, tubal gamete or embryo transfers and fulguration of endometriotic implants. This series demonstrated that operative microlaparoscopy can be carried out under general anaesthesia, reducing to nil the potential damage of a large diameter tracer. Future improvements in i.v. sedation in combination with i.p. local anaesthesia will potentially eliminate the need for general anaesthesia in some of the patients undergoing minor operative microlaparoscopy.
自1993年我们首次报道微型腹腔镜以来,人们一直对微型腹腔镜在使用最小麻醉或镇痛的微创腹腔镜检查中的应用进行评估。本国际多中心关于诊断性和手术性微型腹腔镜安全性和有效性的报告旨在评估微型腹腔镜在广泛的妇科适应症、盆腔和输卵管疾病诊断、输卵管阻塞及辅助生殖中的作用。本报告纳入了来自世界各地七个中心的408例患者。在仅接受局部镇痛的164例接受微型腹腔镜检查的患者中,仅有3例(1.8%)因疼痛不耐受而转为静脉镇静。所有71例按计划接受静脉镇静下微型腹腔镜检查的患者对手术的疼痛耐受程度均可接受。在其余173例接受全身麻醉下微型腹腔镜检查的患者中,仅记录到1例腹壁轻微出血和1例子宫壁轻微出血。在所有408例病例中,盆腔器官的可视化对于所选盆腔病变的诊断和治疗都足够。基于这个相当规模的微型腹腔镜系列,我们得出结论,这种门诊手术可以替代大口径腹腔镜用于各种盆腔疾病的诊断和治疗。对于需要进行如输卵管阻塞、轻微粘连松解、输卵管配子或胚胎移植以及子宫内膜异位植入物电灼等小手术的有意愿的患者,微型腹腔镜可以安全地替代大口径腹腔镜。该系列研究表明,手术性微型腹腔镜可以在全身麻醉下进行,将大口径穿刺器的潜在损伤降至零。未来静脉镇静与腹腔内局部麻醉相结合的改进可能会消除一些接受小手术性微型腹腔镜检查患者对全身麻醉的需求。