• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用1.0伏输出幅度进行慢性心室起搏。

Chronic ventricular pacing using an output amplitude of 1.0 volt.

作者信息

Schwaab B, Schwerdt H, Heisel A, Fröhlig G, Schieffer H

机构信息

Universitätskliniken, Innere Medizin III, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Sep;20(9 Pt 1):2171-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb04233.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb04233.x
PMID:9309740
Abstract

Thirty-seven patients (21 male, 16 female, mean age 71 years) received identical DDD pacemakers. They also received the same bipolar ventricular passive fixation electrode, which has a microporous tip of platinum-iridium, a surface area of 5.8 mm2, and steroid elution. Eighteen months after implantation the ventricular charge threshold [microC] was measured telemetrically at 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 V, respectively. For the 1.0 and 2.0 V amplitudes the pulse duration was increased until the charge per pulse [microC] was twice the threshold value, thus giving a 100% safety margin in terms of charge ("safety charge"). Patients who had ventricular capture at 0.5 V were permanently programmed to 1.0 V (30/37 patients), while those who did not capture at 0.5 V were set to 2.0 V (7/37 patients). In both cases, the pulse duration was programmed according to the rationale of "safety charge." During a routine follow-up period of 6 months, no complications were observed and none of the patients suffered from symptoms indicating loss of ventricular capture. Twenty-four-hour Holter recordings, obtained from all patients at the end of the follow-up with the output parameters unchanged, revealed constant ventricular capture. In patients with chronic stable pacing thresholds and steroid-eluting low threshold leads who have capture at 0.5 V, chronic ventricular pacing at an output amplitude of 1.0 V is feasible, and it seems to be safe if the pacing threshold is measured as charge delivered per pulse and a 100% safety margin in terms of charge is programmed. Reducing the output amplitude to well below the battery voltage may increase pacemaker longevity.

摘要

37名患者(21名男性,16名女性,平均年龄71岁)接受了相同的DDD起搏器。他们还接受了相同的双极心室被动固定电极,该电极具有铂铱微孔尖端,表面积为5.8平方毫米,并带有类固醇洗脱功能。植入18个月后,通过遥测分别在0.5V、1.0V和2.0V测量心室充电阈值[微库仑]。对于1.0V和2.0V的振幅,增加脉冲持续时间,直到每个脉冲的电荷量[微库仑]是阈值的两倍,从而在电荷量方面给出100%的安全裕度(“安全电荷”)。在0.5V时实现心室夺获的患者被永久程控为1.0V(30/37例患者),而在0.5V时未实现夺获的患者被设置为2.0V(7/37例患者)。在这两种情况下,根据“安全电荷”的原理对脉冲持续时间进行程控。在为期6个月的常规随访期间,未观察到并发症,且没有患者出现表明心室夺获丧失的症状。在随访结束时,所有患者在输出参数不变的情况下进行的24小时动态心电图记录显示心室夺获持续存在。对于慢性稳定起搏阈值且使用类固醇洗脱低阈值导线且在0.5V时实现夺获的患者,以1.0V的输出振幅进行慢性心室起搏是可行的,如果将起搏阈值测量为每个脉冲输送的电荷量并在电荷量方面设置100%的安全裕度,似乎也是安全的。将输出振幅降低到远低于电池电压可能会延长起搏器寿命。

相似文献

1
Chronic ventricular pacing using an output amplitude of 1.0 volt.使用1.0伏输出幅度进行慢性心室起搏。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Sep;20(9 Pt 1):2171-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb04233.x.
2
Telemetry guided pacemaker programming: impact of output amplitude and the use of low threshold leads on projected pacemaker longevity.遥测引导的起搏器程控:输出幅度及使用低阈值导线对起搏器预期寿命的影响
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998 Nov;21(11 Pt 1):2055-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb01123.x.
3
Safety and efficiency of pulse charge multiplication for chronic ventricular output programming.慢性心室输出量编程中脉冲电荷倍增的安全性与有效性
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001 Apr;24(4 Pt 1):430-40. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.00430.x.
4
A randomized study on the effects of pacemaker programming to a lower output on projected pulse generator longevity.一项关于将起搏器程控为较低输出对预计脉冲发生器寿命影响的随机研究。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001 Aug;24(8 Pt 1):1234-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.01234.x.
5
Programming of the pacing impulse in pacemakers connected to steroid lead systems.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1995 Feb;18(2):318-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1995.tb02522.x.
6
Effects of local steroid elution on chronic pacing threshold and impedance of endocardial pacemaker leads.局部类固醇洗脱对心内膜起搏器导线慢性起搏阈值和阻抗的影响。
Cardiology. 1993;83(4):240-3. doi: 10.1159/000175976.
7
Present day pacemakers for pulse generator exchange: is 3.5 V a sufficient nominal setting for the pulse amplitude? Thera Pacemaker Study Group.用于脉冲发生器更换的当代起搏器:3.5V作为脉冲幅度的标称设置是否足够?Thera起搏器研究小组。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996 Nov;19(11 Pt 2):1824-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1996.tb03233.x.
8
Long-term follow-up of pacemakers with an Autocapture pacing system.采用自动夺获起搏系统的起搏器的长期随访
Jpn Heart J. 2002 Nov;43(6):631-41. doi: 10.1536/jhj.43.631.
9
A fractally coated, 1.3 mm2 high impedance pacing electrode.一种具有分形涂层的、面积为1.3平方毫米的高阻抗起搏电极。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998 Jun;21(6):1239-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb00183.x.
10
Low settings of the ventricular pacing output in patients dependent on a pacemaker: are they really safe?依赖起搏器的患者心室起搏输出低设置:它们真的安全吗?
Am Heart J. 2002 Jun;143(6):1009-11. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2002.123141.