Suppr超能文献

使用1.0伏输出幅度进行慢性心室起搏。

Chronic ventricular pacing using an output amplitude of 1.0 volt.

作者信息

Schwaab B, Schwerdt H, Heisel A, Fröhlig G, Schieffer H

机构信息

Universitätskliniken, Innere Medizin III, Homburg/Saar, Germany.

出版信息

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1997 Sep;20(9 Pt 1):2171-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1997.tb04233.x.

Abstract

Thirty-seven patients (21 male, 16 female, mean age 71 years) received identical DDD pacemakers. They also received the same bipolar ventricular passive fixation electrode, which has a microporous tip of platinum-iridium, a surface area of 5.8 mm2, and steroid elution. Eighteen months after implantation the ventricular charge threshold [microC] was measured telemetrically at 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 V, respectively. For the 1.0 and 2.0 V amplitudes the pulse duration was increased until the charge per pulse [microC] was twice the threshold value, thus giving a 100% safety margin in terms of charge ("safety charge"). Patients who had ventricular capture at 0.5 V were permanently programmed to 1.0 V (30/37 patients), while those who did not capture at 0.5 V were set to 2.0 V (7/37 patients). In both cases, the pulse duration was programmed according to the rationale of "safety charge." During a routine follow-up period of 6 months, no complications were observed and none of the patients suffered from symptoms indicating loss of ventricular capture. Twenty-four-hour Holter recordings, obtained from all patients at the end of the follow-up with the output parameters unchanged, revealed constant ventricular capture. In patients with chronic stable pacing thresholds and steroid-eluting low threshold leads who have capture at 0.5 V, chronic ventricular pacing at an output amplitude of 1.0 V is feasible, and it seems to be safe if the pacing threshold is measured as charge delivered per pulse and a 100% safety margin in terms of charge is programmed. Reducing the output amplitude to well below the battery voltage may increase pacemaker longevity.

摘要

37名患者(21名男性,16名女性,平均年龄71岁)接受了相同的DDD起搏器。他们还接受了相同的双极心室被动固定电极,该电极具有铂铱微孔尖端,表面积为5.8平方毫米,并带有类固醇洗脱功能。植入18个月后,通过遥测分别在0.5V、1.0V和2.0V测量心室充电阈值[微库仑]。对于1.0V和2.0V的振幅,增加脉冲持续时间,直到每个脉冲的电荷量[微库仑]是阈值的两倍,从而在电荷量方面给出100%的安全裕度(“安全电荷”)。在0.5V时实现心室夺获的患者被永久程控为1.0V(30/37例患者),而在0.5V时未实现夺获的患者被设置为2.0V(7/37例患者)。在这两种情况下,根据“安全电荷”的原理对脉冲持续时间进行程控。在为期6个月的常规随访期间,未观察到并发症,且没有患者出现表明心室夺获丧失的症状。在随访结束时,所有患者在输出参数不变的情况下进行的24小时动态心电图记录显示心室夺获持续存在。对于慢性稳定起搏阈值且使用类固醇洗脱低阈值导线且在0.5V时实现夺获的患者,以1.0V的输出振幅进行慢性心室起搏是可行的,如果将起搏阈值测量为每个脉冲输送的电荷量并在电荷量方面设置100%的安全裕度,似乎也是安全的。将输出振幅降低到远低于电池电压可能会延长起搏器寿命。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验