• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[德国指南清理程序的一个概念]

[A concept for a clearing procedure for guidelines in Germany].

作者信息

Lauterbach K W, Lubecki P, Oesingmann U, Ollenschläger G, Richard S, Straub C

机构信息

Institut für Gesundheitsökonomie, Medizin und Gesellschaft, Universität zu Köln.

出版信息

Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 1997 Jun;91(3):283-8.

PMID:9312434
Abstract

Guidelines are efficient tools for the maintenance and improvement of the quality of care and contribute to the increase of the efficacy of care. However, the quality of guidelines has not been investigated or improved much in Germany. This is especially true for the formal assessment of guidelines regarding the collection and evaluation of evidence, their feasibility and their effects on health economy. There is an internationally recognized method available to examine and evaluate current and new guidelines with respect to these three categories. This paper proposes a clearing procedure for guidelines in Germany to systematically improve the quality of guidelines and to offer authors as well as users of guidelines valuable informations.

摘要

指南是维护和提高医疗质量的有效工具,有助于提高医疗效果。然而,在德国,指南的质量尚未得到充分的研究或改进。在证据收集与评估、可行性及其对卫生经济的影响等方面对指南进行的正式评估尤其如此。有一个国际认可的方法可用于从这三个类别来检查和评估现行及新的指南。本文提出了一种针对德国指南的清理程序,以系统地提高指南质量,并为指南的作者和使用者提供有价值的信息。

相似文献

1
[A concept for a clearing procedure for guidelines in Germany].[德国指南清理程序的一个概念]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 1997 Jun;91(3):283-8.
2
[Medical guidelines in Germany--current status and future developments].[德国的医学指南——现状与未来发展]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 1998 May;92(4):273-80.
3
[Guidelines for quality assessment in psychiatric clinics].
Nervenarzt. 1996 Nov;67(11):973-4.
4
[Guidelines for quality assessment in psychiatric clinics. A brief introduction].
Nervenarzt. 1996 Nov;67(11):970-1.
5
[Guidelines in surgery: from the viewpoint of the legal process].
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1997;114:74-8.
6
[Development of guidelines in health care facilities].
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 1997 Aug;91(5):479-81.
7
[Guidelines as the principle of rational medical management].
Chirurg. 1998 Feb;69(2):suppl 33-8.
8
[Practice guidelines--legal aspects].
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2000 Jan;94(1):65-9.
9
["Directions, guidelines, standards"--risk or advantage for physician and patient?].["方向、指南、标准"——对医生和患者而言是风险还是益处?]
Chirurg. 1998 Feb;69(2):suppl 44-8.
10
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.

引用本文的文献

1
[Use of the World Health Organization guidelines on cancer pain relief before referral to a specialized pain service].在转诊至专业疼痛服务机构之前使用世界卫生组织癌症疼痛缓解指南
Schmerz. 2005 Aug;19(4):265-71. doi: 10.1007/s00482-004-0338-y.
2
[Development of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines; a model project integrating external evidence and clinical expertise].
Med Klin (Munich). 1999 Nov 15;94(11):643-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03045007.