Suppr超能文献

[使用不同营养数据库时营养摄入量的差异——一个例子]

[Differences in nutrient intake using different nutrient databases-- an example].

作者信息

Linseisen J, Wolfram G

机构信息

Institut für Ernährungswissenschaft der TU München, Freising-Weihenstephan.

出版信息

Z Ernahrungswiss. 1997 Jun;36(2):127-32. doi: 10.1007/BF01611390.

Abstract

Mean dietary intake calculated from 25 7-day-food records by means of the three nutrient data bases modified Souci/Fachmann/Kraut (mSFK) 1986/87, extract of Bundeslebensmittelschlüssel (BLS) version 2.1, and extract of BLS version 2.2 revealed comparable results only for four of 27 nutrients considered. The greatest deviations were found for zink, fluoride, iodine, vitamin D, vitamin C, and dietary fiber. Comparing the revised BLS version 2.2 and mSFK, the differences in fluoride, iodine and dietary fiber intake data were markedly lower than found with the comparison of BLS 2.1 and mSFK; statistically significant differences no longer existed for the vitamins C and A (equivalents). As expected, using the mSFK data base with some missing fields for analytical data underestimation of nutrient intake could be shown for the trace elements zink, fluoride and iodine. With regard to the given results of the investigated group, care has to be taken with some nutrient intake data gathered by means of BLS 2.1, too.

摘要

通过三种营养数据库(修改后的Souci/Fachmann/Kraut(mSFK)1986/87、联邦食品代码(BLS)2.1版提取物以及BLS 2.2版提取物),根据25份7天食物记录计算得出的平均膳食摄入量,在所考虑的27种营养素中,只有4种得出了可比结果。锌、氟、碘、维生素D、维生素C和膳食纤维的偏差最大。比较修订后的BLS 2.2版和mSFK,氟、碘和膳食纤维摄入量数据的差异明显低于BLS 2.1版与mSFK的比较结果;维生素C和维生素A(当量)不再存在统计学上的显著差异。正如预期的那样,使用存在一些分析数据缺失字段的mSFK数据库,对于锌、氟和碘等微量元素,可发现营养素摄入量被低估。就被调查群体的给定结果而言,对于通过BLS 2.1收集的一些营养素摄入量数据也必须谨慎对待。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验