Souhami R L, Craft A W, Van der Eijken J W, Nooij M, Spooner D, Bramwell V H, Wierzbicki R, Malcolm A J, Kirkpatrick A, Uscinska B M, Van Glabbeke M, Machin D
University College London Medical School, UK.
Lancet. 1997 Sep 27;350(9082):911-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)02307-6.
A previous trial by the European Osteosarcoma Intergroup (EOI) suggested that a short intensive chemotherapy regimen with doxorubicin and cisplatin might produce survival of operable, non-metastatic osteosarcoma similar to that obtained with complex and longer-duration drug regimens based on the widely used T10 multi-drug protocol. We undertook a randomised multicentre trial to compare these two approaches.
407 patients with operable, non-metastatic osteosarcoma were randomly assigned the two-drug regimen (six cycles [18 weeks] of doxorubicin 25 mg/m2 on days 1-3 and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day 1) or a multi-drug regimen (preoperatively vincristine, high-dose methotrexate, and doxorubicin; postoperatively bleomycin, cyclophosphamide, dactinomycin, vincristine, methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatin; this protocol took 44 weeks). Surgery was scheduled for week 9 for the two-drug group and week 7 for the multi-drug group. Analyses of survival and progression-free survival were by intention to treat.
Of 407 randomised patients, 391 were eligible and have been followed up for at least 4 years (median 5-6 years). Toxic effects were qualitatively similar with the two regimens. However, 188 (94%) of 199 patients completed the six cycles of two-drug treatment, whereas only 97 (51%) of 192 completed 18 or more of the 20 cycles of the multi-drug regimen. The proportion showing a good histopathological response (> 90% tumour necrosis) to preoperative chemotherapy was about 29% with both regimens and was strongly predictive of survival. Overall survival was 65% at 3 years and 55% at 5 years in both groups (hazard ratio 0.94 [95% CI 0.69-1.27]). Progression-free survival at 5 years was 44% in both groups (hazard ratio 1.01 [0.77-1.33]).
We found no difference in survival between the two-drug and multi-drug regimens in operable, non-metastatic osteosarcoma. The two-drug regimen is shorter in duration and better tolerated, and is therefore the preferred treatment. However, 5-year survival is still unsatisfactory and new approaches to treatment, such as dose intensification, are needed to improve results.
欧洲骨肉瘤协作组(EOI)之前的一项试验表明,一种使用阿霉素和顺铂的短期强化化疗方案可能使可手术的非转移性骨肉瘤患者的生存率与基于广泛使用的T10多药方案的复杂且疗程更长的药物方案所获得的生存率相似。我们进行了一项随机多中心试验来比较这两种方法。
407例可手术的非转移性骨肉瘤患者被随机分配接受两药方案(第1 - 3天给予阿霉素25mg/m²共六个周期[18周],第1天给予顺铂100mg/m²)或多药方案(术前使用长春新碱、高剂量甲氨蝶呤和阿霉素;术后使用博来霉素、环磷酰胺、放线菌素D、长春新碱、甲氨蝶呤、阿霉素和顺铂;该方案历时44周)。两药组手术安排在第9周,多药组手术安排在第7周。生存分析和无进展生存分析按意向性治疗原则进行。
407例随机分组的患者中,391例符合条件并至少随访了4年(中位随访时间5 - 6年)。两种方案的毒性作用在性质上相似。然而,199例接受两药治疗的患者中有188例(94%)完成了六个周期的治疗,而192例接受多药方案治疗的患者中只有97例(51%)完成了20个周期中的18个或更多周期。两种方案中对术前化疗显示良好组织病理学反应(肿瘤坏死>90%)的比例约为29%,且是生存的强预测因素。两组的3年总生存率均为65%,5年总生存率均为55%(风险比0.94[95%CI 0.69 - 1.27])。两组的5年无进展生存率均为44%(风险比1.01[0.77 - 1.33])。
我们发现,在可手术的非转移性骨肉瘤中,两药方案和多药方案在生存率方面没有差异。两药方案疗程更短且耐受性更好,因此是首选治疗方案。然而,5年生存率仍然不尽人意,需要新的治疗方法,如剂量强化,来改善治疗效果。