• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

糖尿病患者的再狭窄率:天然冠状动脉血管中冠状动脉支架置入术与球囊血管成形术的比较

Restenosis rates in diabetic patients: a comparison of coronary stenting and balloon angioplasty in native coronary vessels.

作者信息

Van Belle E, Bauters C, Hubert E, Bodart J C, Abolmaali K, Meurice T, McFadden E P, Lablanche J M, Bertrand M E

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University of Lille, France.

出版信息

Circulation. 1997 Sep 2;96(5):1454-60. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.5.1454.

DOI:10.1161/01.cir.96.5.1454
PMID:9315531
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Diabetes is a major risk factor for restenosis after coronary balloon angioplasty. Recent studies have shown that coronary stenting significantly reduces restenosis compared with balloon angioplasty alone. However, limited information is available on the effect of coronary stenting in diabetic patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We designed this study to analyze the effect of diabetes on restenosis in patients treated with either balloon angioplasty or coronary stenting who were enrolled in a 6-month angiographic follow-up program. Three hundred consecutive patients, 19% of whom were diabetics, who underwent coronary stent implantation during a single-vessel procedure on native coronary vessels and who had 6-month angiographic follow-up constituted the study group (stent group). Three hundred consecutive patients who underwent 6-month angiographic follow-up after single-vessel conventional balloon angioplasty served as control patients (balloon group). Preprocedural, postprocedural, and follow-up angiograms were analyzed with quantitative angiography. In the balloon group, the restenosis rate was almost twofold higher in diabetic than in nondiabetic patients (63% versus 36%; P=.0002) owing to both a greater late loss (0.79+/-0.70 versus 0.41+/-0.61 mm, respectively; P<.0001) and a higher rate of late vessel occlusion (14% versus 3%, respectively; P<.001). In the stent group, restenosis rates were similar in diabetics and nondiabetics (25% versus 27%, respectively). Furthermore, in the stent group, late loss (0.77+/-0.65 versus 0.79+/-0.57 mm, respectively) and the rate of late vessel occlusion (2% versus 1%, respectively) did not differ significantly between diabetic and nondiabetic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although diabetics have increased rates of restenosis and late vessel occlusion after simple balloon angioplasty, they have the same improved outcome with coronary stenting that has been documented in nondiabetic patients.

摘要

背景

糖尿病是冠状动脉球囊血管成形术后再狭窄的主要危险因素。近期研究表明,与单纯球囊血管成形术相比,冠状动脉支架置入术能显著降低再狭窄率。然而,关于冠状动脉支架置入术对糖尿病患者影响的信息有限。

方法与结果

我们设计本研究以分析糖尿病对接受球囊血管成形术或冠状动脉支架置入术且参加了为期6个月血管造影随访项目患者再狭窄的影响。连续300例患者构成研究组(支架组),这些患者在单支冠状动脉血管的单一手术中接受了冠状动脉支架植入术,且有6个月的血管造影随访,其中19%为糖尿病患者。连续300例在单支冠状动脉进行传统球囊血管成形术后接受6个月血管造影随访的患者作为对照患者(球囊组)。术前、术后及随访血管造影采用定量血管造影分析。在球囊组,糖尿病患者的再狭窄率几乎是非糖尿病患者的两倍(分别为63%和36%;P = 0.0002),这是由于晚期管腔丢失更大(分别为0.79±0.70 mm和0.41±0.61 mm;P < 0.0001)以及晚期血管闭塞率更高(分别为14%和3%;P < 0.001)。在支架组,糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的再狭窄率相似(分别为25%和27%)。此外,在支架组,糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的晚期管腔丢失(分别为0.77±0.65 mm和0.79±0.57 mm)及晚期血管闭塞率(分别为2%和1%)差异无统计学意义。

结论

尽管糖尿病患者在单纯球囊血管成形术后再狭窄率和晚期血管闭塞率增加,但他们在冠状动脉支架置入术后的预后改善情况与非糖尿病患者相同。

相似文献

1
Restenosis rates in diabetic patients: a comparison of coronary stenting and balloon angioplasty in native coronary vessels.糖尿病患者的再狭窄率:天然冠状动脉血管中冠状动脉支架置入术与球囊血管成形术的比较
Circulation. 1997 Sep 2;96(5):1454-60. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.5.1454.
2
[A comparison of the clinical and angiographic evolution of diabetic and nondiabetic patients treated by conventional angioplasty versus stent implantation in native coronary arteries].[糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者在接受冠状动脉原位常规血管成形术与支架植入术治疗后的临床及血管造影演变比较]
Rev Esp Cardiol. 2000 Feb;53(2):172-8. doi: 10.1016/s0300-8932(00)75080-9.
3
Effects of coronary stenting on restenosis and occlusion after angioplasty of the culprit vessel in patients with recent myocardial infarction.冠状动脉支架置入术对近期心肌梗死患者罪犯血管血管成形术后再狭窄和闭塞的影响。
Circulation. 1997 Nov 4;96(9):2854-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.9.2854.
4
Single bailout stenting for threatened coronary closure complicating balloon angioplasty: acute and mid-term outcome.针对球囊血管成形术并发的濒临冠状动脉闭塞进行单支架挽救性置入术:急性和中期结果
Coron Artery Dis. 1996 Apr;7(4):327-33. doi: 10.1097/00019501-199604000-00010.
5
Coronary stenting in diabetics: six months clinical and angiographic outcome.糖尿病患者的冠状动脉支架置入术:六个月的临床和血管造影结果。
Indian Heart J. 2000 Jul-Aug;52(4):416-20.
6
Stenting of nonacute total coronary occlusions: predictors of late angiographic outcome.非急性冠状动脉完全闭塞病变的支架置入术:晚期血管造影结果的预测因素
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Feb;31(2):275-80. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00501-9.
7
Serial angiographic follow-up after Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation: comparison with conventional balloon angioplasty.Palmaz-Schatz支架植入术后的系列血管造影随访:与传统球囊血管成形术的比较。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Jun;21(7):1557-63. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90368-b.
8
Efficacy of coronary stenting versus balloon angioplasty in small coronary arteries. Stent Restenosis Study (STRESS) Investigators.冠状动脉支架置入术与球囊血管成形术治疗小冠状动脉的疗效比较。支架再狭窄研究(STRESS)调查组。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998 Feb;31(2):307-11. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00511-1.
9
Coronary-artery stenting compared with balloon angioplasty for restenosis after initial balloon angioplasty. Restenosis Stent Study Group.冠状动脉支架置入术与球囊血管成形术治疗初次球囊血管成形术后再狭窄的比较。再狭窄支架研究组。
N Engl J Med. 1998 Dec 3;339(23):1672-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199812033392304.
10
Comparison of paclitaxel drug-eluting balloon and paclitaxel-eluting stent in small coronary vessels in diabetic and nondiabetic patients - results from the BELLO (balloon elution and late loss optimization) trial.糖尿病和非糖尿病患者小冠状动脉中紫杉醇药物洗脱球囊与紫杉醇洗脱支架的比较——BELLO(球囊洗脱与晚期丢失优化)试验结果
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017 Jan-Feb;18(1):4-9. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2016.12.008. Epub 2016 Dec 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Angiographic Success and Clinical Outcomes Based on Different Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Techniques.基于不同经皮冠状动脉介入技术的血管造影成功率和临床结果比较。
Cureus. 2024 Sep 13;16(9):e69342. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69342. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Protective Factors and the Pathogenesis of Complications in Diabetes.保护因素与糖尿病并发症的发病机制。
Endocr Rev. 2024 Mar 4;45(2):227-252. doi: 10.1210/endrev/bnad030.
3
An Overview of Clinical Examinations in the Evaluation and Assessment of Arterial and Venous Insufficiency Wounds.
评估和评定动静脉功能不全伤口时临床检查概述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jul 27;13(15):2494. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13152494.
4
Diabetes and restenosis.糖尿病与再狭窄。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2022 Feb 14;21(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12933-022-01460-5.
5
Pathogenesis and Clinical Significance of In-Stent Restenosis in Patients with Diabetes.糖尿病患者支架内再狭窄的发病机制及临床意义。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 15;18(22):11970. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211970.
6
Vascular restoration therapy and bioresorbable vascular scaffold.血管修复治疗和生物可吸收血管支架。
Regen Biomater. 2014 Nov;1(1):49-55. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbu005. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
7
Favorable Outcomes after Implantation of Biodegradable Polymer Coated Sirolimus-Eluting Stents in Diabetic Population: Results from INDOLIMUS-G Diabetic Registry.糖尿病患者植入可生物降解聚合物涂层西罗莫司洗脱支架后的良好预后:INDOLIMUS-G糖尿病注册研究结果
Int J Vasc Med. 2015;2015:265670. doi: 10.1155/2015/265670. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
8
Long-term follow-up of coronary angioplasty in patients with diabetes compared with nondiabetics.糖尿病患者与非糖尿病患者冠状动脉血管成形术的长期随访
Neth Heart J. 2004 Apr;12(4):144-150.
9
Long-term clinical outcome of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with and without diabetes mellitus in the Zwolle trial.兹沃勒试验中伴或不伴糖尿病的ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的长期临床结局
Neth Heart J. 2003 Oct;11(10):387-393.
10
Influence of the angiotensin converting enzyme insertion or deletion genetic variant and coronary restenosis risk: evidence based on 11,193 subjects.血管紧张素转换酶插入或缺失基因变异与冠状动脉再狭窄风险的关系:基于11193名受试者的证据
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 13;8(12):e83415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083415. eCollection 2013.