Kasch F W, Wallace J P, Huhn R R, Krogh L A, Hurl P M
J Appl Physiol. 1976 Jun;40(6):982-3. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1976.40.6.982.
The VO2max response of 12 well-trained and highly motivated college males was measured using two treadmill protocols: horizontal (H) and inclined (I). The duration of each test averaged 10 min. In the H test the treadmill bed was horizontal with the running rate held constant for the first 6 min, after which time it was increased at 1-min intervals to near maximal subject running speed, according to the HR response, until exhaustion. The I method simulated the protocol of Costill and Fox, with the treadmill speed at about 80-90% of mean maximal running rate established from 12- and 15-min track runs. The treadmill bed was held horizontal during the first 4 min, after which time it was elevated to 4% and elevated 2% each 2 min thereafter until exhaustion. No significant differences were found in VO2max, 4.267 1/min (I), and 4.192 1/min (H), average max HR, 190.4/MIN (I), and 188.9/min (H); respiratory rate, 56.4/min (I), and 62.0/min (H); and VEBTPS, 145.2 1/min (I), and 143.3 1/min (H). It was concluded that the intensities of both treadmill methods, H and I, were sufficient to produce a nonsignificant difference in maximal VO2 values with the type subjects employed.
采用两种跑步机方案测量了12名训练有素且积极性很高的大学男性的最大摄氧量(VO2max)反应:水平(H)方案和倾斜(I)方案。每次测试的持续时间平均为10分钟。在H测试中,跑步机台面是水平的,在前6分钟跑步速度保持恒定,此后根据心率反应,以1分钟的间隔增加速度,直至接近受试者的最大跑步速度,直到力竭。I方法模拟了科斯蒂尔(Costill)和福克斯(Fox)的方案,跑步机速度约为根据12分钟和15分钟跑道跑确定的平均最大跑步速度的80%-90%。跑步机台面在前4分钟保持水平,此后将其抬高至4%,并在此后每2分钟抬高2%,直到力竭。在最大摄氧量方面未发现显著差异,I方案为4.267升/分钟,H方案为4.192升/分钟;平均最大心率方面,I方案为190.4次/分钟,H方案为188.9次/分钟;呼吸频率方面,I方案为56.4次/分钟,H方案为62.0次/分钟;以及体温平衡时的每分通气量(VEBTPS)方面,I方案为145.2升/分钟,H方案为143.3升/分钟。得出的结论是,对于所采用的这类受试者,H和I这两种跑步机方案的强度足以使最大VO2值产生不显著的差异。