Romano S L, Palumbi S R
Department of Zoology, University of Hawaii, Honolulu 96822, USA.
J Mol Evol. 1997 Oct;45(4):397-411. doi: 10.1007/pl00006245.
Relationships among families and suborders of scleractinian corals are poorly understood because of difficulties 1) in making inferences about the evolution of the morphological characters used in coral taxonomy and 2) in interpreting their 240-million-year fossil record. Here we describe patterns of molecular evolution in a segment of the mitochondrial (mt) 16S ribosomal gene from taxa of 14 families of corals and the use of this gene segment in a phylogenetic analysis of relationships within the order. We show that sequences obtained from scleractinians are homologous to other metazoan 16S ribosomal sequences and fall into-two distinct clades defined by size of the amplified gene product. Comparisons of sequences from the two clades demonstrate that both sets of sequences are evolving under similar evolutionary constraints: they do not differ in nucleotide composition, numbers of transition and transversion substitutions, spatial patterns of substitutions, or in rates of divergence. The characteristics and patterns observed in these sequences as well as the secondary structures, are similar to those observed in mt 16S ribosomal DNA sequences from other taxa. Phylogenetic analysis of these sequences shows that they are useful for evaluating relationships within the order. The hypothesis generated from this analysis differs from traditional hypotheses for evolutionary relationships among the Scleractinia and suggests that a reevaluation of evolutionary affinities in the order is needed.
由于存在两方面困难,石珊瑚目珊瑚的科与亚目之间的关系目前还了解甚少。其一,难以推断珊瑚分类学中所使用的形态特征的进化情况;其二,难以解读其有着2.4亿年历史的化石记录。在此,我们描述了来自14个珊瑚科分类群的线粒体(mt)16S核糖体基因片段中的分子进化模式,并将该基因片段用于该目内部关系的系统发育分析。我们发现,从石珊瑚目获得的序列与其他后生动物的16S核糖体序列同源,并根据扩增基因产物的大小分为两个不同的进化枝。对这两个进化枝的序列比较表明,两组序列都在相似的进化限制下演变:它们在核苷酸组成、转换和颠换替代的数量、替代的空间模式或分歧率方面没有差异。在这些序列以及二级结构中观察到的特征和模式,与在其他分类群的mt 16S核糖体DNA序列中观察到的相似。对这些序列的系统发育分析表明,它们有助于评估该目内部的关系。该分析产生的假设与关于石珊瑚目进化关系的传统假设不同,这表明需要对该目中的进化亲缘关系进行重新评估。