Lindsey I, Woods S D, Nottle P D
Alfred Hospital Trauma Centre, Prahran, Victoria, Australia.
Aust N Z J Surg. 1997 Sep;67(9):619-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1997.tb04609.x.
Diaphragmatic injury is difficult to diagnose using current radiological modalities, and missed diagnosis has been associated with a mortality of 20-36%. Laparotomy is the most sensitive of the standard diagnostic tools, but its unnecessary use can be up to 25% and carries a morbidity of 20%.
The use of the laparoscope in three cases of blunt diaphragmatic injury is reported here. Two cases were non-acute. The diagnosis of diaphragmatic injury could not be confirmed pre-operatively in any of the cases.
One, a left-sided injury, was easily diagnosed and repaired laparoscopically. The second, right-sided, was confirmed laparoscopically but had to be repaired by open due to difficulty with liver retraction. The third case, an acute injury, was not diagnosed at laparoscopy. Findings of free blood and distended small bowel warranted laparotomy and prevented the establishment of a safe, satisfactory pneumoperitoneum. Repair was performed open. None of the cases was complicated by pneumothorax.
Laparoscopy is a useful tool for diagnosis of non-acute blunt diaphragmatic injury but has limitations in the acute setting. Left-sided injuries can be repaired laparoscopically but right-sided injuries proved difficult and may be better dealt with thoracoscopically.
使用当前的放射学检查方法很难诊断膈肌损伤,漏诊率与20%至36%的死亡率相关。剖腹术是标准诊断工具中最敏感的,但不必要的使用率可达25%,且发病率为20%。
本文报道了腹腔镜在3例钝性膈肌损伤中的应用。2例为非急性损伤。所有病例术前均未确诊膈肌损伤。
1例为左侧损伤,腹腔镜下易于诊断并修复。第2例为右侧损伤,腹腔镜确诊,但因肝脏牵拉困难需开腹修复。第3例为急性损伤,腹腔镜检查未确诊。腹腔内游离血和小肠扩张的表现提示需行剖腹术,且无法建立安全、满意的气腹。开腹进行修复。所有病例均未并发气胸。
腹腔镜是诊断非急性钝性膈肌损伤的有用工具,但在急性情况下有局限性。左侧损伤可通过腹腔镜修复,但右侧损伤证明困难,可能通过胸腔镜处理更好。