Marais G I, Fletcher J M, Potter P C
Department of Immunology, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town.
S Afr Med J. 1997 Aug;87(8):1004-8.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of skin-prick tests, radio-allergosorbent tests (CAP RASTs), basophil histamine release, sulphidoleukotriene release and Western blotting in the diagnosis of latex allergy at Groote Schuur Hospital.
Patients with a history suggesting latex hypersensitivity were recruited via staff health and allergy clinics at Groote Schuur Hospital. A clinical assessment was followed by laboratory investigation and skin-prick testing. A control group consisted of laboratory and hospital staff who had regular latex exposure but were asymptomatic.
Hospital-based cohort at Groote Schuur Hospital.
Twenty-three patients with suspected latex allergy; 10 control subjects exposed to, but not clinically sensitive to, latex.
Skin-prick testing was more sensitive than in vitro diagnostic tests for the diagnosis of latex allergy.
Eighteen of 21 (85.7%) of the patients tested had a positive skin-prick test with a commercial latex solution (Allerbioprick) and 17/21 (80%) tested skin-prick-positive with an in-house glove extract. CAP RASTs were positive in 13/23 patients (56.5%), sulphidoleukotriene release was positive in 10/23 (43%), histamine release assay was positive in 10/23 (45%) and Western blots were positive in 8/23 (34.7%). All patients with only urticaria were Western blot-negative and CAP RAST-negative, suggesting that they have very little circulating latex-specific IgE. Although patients who were Western blot-positive tended to have multi-organ involvement, both patients with anaphylaxis were Western blot-negative.
Latex allergy is a significant clinical problem at Groote Schuur Hospital. Titrated skin-prick testing performed in a controlled environment can safely and reliably confirm the diagnosis in patients who do not give a history of anaphylaxis. The CAP RAST was the most sensitive in vitro test for latex allergy locally available, but lacks sensitivity in patients presenting with urticaria only.
本研究旨在评估皮肤点刺试验、放射性变应原吸附试验(CAP RAST)、嗜碱性粒细胞组胺释放试验、硫代白三烯释放试验及免疫印迹法在格罗特·舒尔医院乳胶过敏诊断中的应用价值。
通过格罗特·舒尔医院的员工健康与过敏门诊招募有乳胶过敏史的患者。先进行临床评估,随后进行实验室检查和皮肤点刺试验。对照组由定期接触乳胶但无症状的实验室及医院工作人员组成。
格罗特·舒尔医院的医院队列研究。
23例疑似乳胶过敏患者;10例接触乳胶但无临床过敏反应的对照者。
皮肤点刺试验在乳胶过敏诊断中比体外诊断试验更敏感。
21例接受检测的患者中有18例(85.7%)对商用乳胶溶液(Allerbioprick)皮肤点刺试验呈阳性,17/21(80%)对自制手套提取物皮肤点刺试验呈阳性。13/23例患者(56.5%)的CAP RAST呈阳性,10/23(43%)的硫代白三烯释放试验呈阳性,10/23(45%)的组胺释放试验呈阳性,8/23(34.7%)的免疫印迹法呈阳性。所有仅出现荨麻疹的患者免疫印迹法和CAP RAST均为阴性,提示其循环中乳胶特异性IgE极少。尽管免疫印迹法呈阳性的患者往往有多器官受累,但2例过敏反应患者免疫印迹法均为阴性。
乳胶过敏在格罗特·舒尔医院是一个重要的临床问题。在可控环境下进行的滴定皮肤点刺试验能够安全可靠地确诊无过敏反应病史的患者。CAP RAST是当地可获得的对乳胶过敏最敏感的体外试验,但对仅出现荨麻疹的患者缺乏敏感性。