Moav N, Goldblatt D, Moav B, Frensdorff A
J Immunol. 1976 Jul;117(1):343-9.
In an attempt to explore the mechanism by which antigenic stimulation alters gene expression in lymphoid cells in vivo, three different hybridization techniques have been used to compare the complexity of the genome of lymphoid cells from normal and from immune BALB/c mice. RNA/DNA hybridization experiments at a DNA excess of 1000 demonstrated that normal RNA and immune RNA hybridized identically with DNA extracted from mouse spleen cells before and after immunization and with liver DNA. These findings indicate that DNA sequences complementary to immune RNA or to normal RNA are represented in a number of copies not significantly different in the genome of normal lymphoid cells and in that of immune lymphoid cells. Hybridizations of normal and of immune RNA with normal and immune pulse-labeled DNA, done at RNA excess, detected no differences between these two DNA. However, significant differences were observed in the percentage of DNA hybridized with normal and immune RNA; 3 to 4% of the DNA hybridized with normal RNA and 8 to 9% with immune RNA. This indicates that more DNA sequences are transcribed 48 hr after immunization than before immunization. The RNA exhaustion rates caused by normal and immune DNA were found to be identical, indicating that antigenic stimulation did not induce major changes in the number of DNA base sequences complementary to the RNA tested. However, when normal and immune pulse-labeled RNA were compared by exhaustion with DNA, the immune pulse-labeled RNA obtained 48 hr after immunization displayed a slower exhaustion rate than normal RNA or RNA extracted 72 hr after immunization. These results suggest the temporary synthesis, at a higher frequency, of certain RNA sepcies 48 hr after immunization, as compared to the RNA synthesis in normal, nonimmune cells, or that occurring 72 hr after immunization. Thus, the three experimental approaches used lead to the conclusion that antigenic stimulation does not induce major gene amplification; it does, however, change the transcription rate of certain RNA species.
为了探索抗原刺激在体内改变淋巴细胞基因表达的机制,已使用三种不同的杂交技术来比较正常和免疫BALB/c小鼠淋巴细胞基因组的复杂性。在DNA过量1000的情况下进行的RNA/DNA杂交实验表明,正常RNA和免疫RNA与免疫前后从小鼠脾细胞中提取的DNA以及肝脏DNA的杂交情况相同。这些发现表明,与免疫RNA或正常RNA互补的DNA序列在正常淋巴细胞基因组和免疫淋巴细胞基因组中的拷贝数没有显著差异。在RNA过量的情况下,将正常RNA和免疫RNA与正常和免疫脉冲标记的DNA进行杂交,未检测到这两种DNA之间的差异。然而,观察到与正常RNA和免疫RNA杂交的DNA百分比存在显著差异;与正常RNA杂交的DNA为3%至4%,与免疫RNA杂交的DNA为8%至9%。这表明免疫后48小时转录的DNA序列比免疫前更多。发现正常DNA和免疫DNA引起的RNA消耗率相同,这表明抗原刺激并未导致与测试RNA互补的DNA碱基序列数量发生重大变化。然而,当通过与DNA的消耗比较来比较正常和免疫脉冲标记的RNA时,免疫后48小时获得的免疫脉冲标记RNA的消耗率比正常RNA或免疫后72小时提取的RNA慢。这些结果表明,与正常非免疫细胞中的RNA合成或免疫后72小时发生的RNA合成相比,免疫后48小时某些RNA种类以更高的频率暂时合成。因此,所采用的三种实验方法得出的结论是,抗原刺激不会诱导主要的基因扩增;然而,它确实会改变某些RNA种类的转录速率。