Fallick M L, McDermott D F, LaRock D, Long J P, Atkins M B
Department of Urology, Tufts University School of Medicine, New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Urol. 1997 Nov;158(5):1691-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64097-7.
The management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma remains challenging and controversial. There is some evidence of improved response to interleukin-2 (IL-2) based immunotherapy in patients who undergo nephrectomy before systemic treatment. However, recent reports have suggested that surgery prior to immunotherapy may not be an efficient strategy, since many patients will not be able to receive systemic treatment after nephrectomy. We describe our criteria for determining which patients are candidates for nephrectomy before immunotherapy and present our series of patients treated with this approach.
Based on our initial experience with IL-2 based immunotherapy we developed certain inclusion criteria for treatment with initial nephrectomy followed by systemic immunotherapy, including greater than 75% debulking of tumor burden possible, no central nervous system, bone or liver metastases, adequate pulmonary and cardiac function, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. In addition, patients in whom biopsies show other than predominantly clear cell type histology are excluded. From 1991 through 1996, 28 patients met these criteria and were treated with this approach. Patients were followed to determine the number receiving immunotherapy as well as overall response and survival rates.
Radical nephrectomy was performed in all patients. One patient died of respiratory failure from disease progression 1 month after nephrectomy. Another patient had poor pulmonary function and, therefore, was treated with an alternative cytokine therapy. The remaining 26 patients (93%) received at least 1 course of IL-2. Median interval between nephrectomy and initiation of immunotherapy was 1.5 months (range 1 to 3). Overall response rate was 39% with 5 complete (18%) and 6 partial (21%) responses. Actuarial median survival of the entire group was 20.5 months (range 1 to 66) from the initiation of treatment. Currently 13 patients are alive, including 8 who are disease and/or progression-free.
Using these strict criteria nephrectomy can be effectively performed before immunotherapy without compromising the likelihood that patients will receive systemic treatment. The activity of IL-2 in patients treated with this approach is encouraging and justifies its consideration in properly selected patients.
转移性肾细胞癌的治疗仍然具有挑战性且存在争议。有证据表明,在全身治疗前接受肾切除术的患者对基于白细胞介素-2(IL-2)的免疫治疗反应有所改善。然而,最近的报告表明,免疫治疗前的手术可能不是一种有效的策略,因为许多患者在肾切除术后将无法接受全身治疗。我们描述了确定哪些患者适合在免疫治疗前进行肾切除术的标准,并展示了我们采用这种方法治疗的一系列患者。
基于我们对基于IL-2的免疫治疗的初步经验,我们制定了某些纳入标准,用于初始肾切除术后进行全身免疫治疗,包括肿瘤负荷可能减少超过75%、无中枢神经系统、骨骼或肝脏转移、肺和心脏功能良好以及东部肿瘤协作组体能状态为0或1。此外,活检显示组织学类型不是以透明细胞型为主的患者被排除。从1991年到1996年,28名患者符合这些标准并采用这种方法进行治疗。对患者进行随访,以确定接受免疫治疗的人数以及总体反应率和生存率。
所有患者均接受了根治性肾切除术。一名患者在肾切除术后1个月因疾病进展死于呼吸衰竭。另一名患者肺功能差,因此接受了替代细胞因子治疗。其余26名患者(93%)接受了至少1个疗程的IL-2治疗。肾切除术与开始免疫治疗之间的中位间隔为1.5个月(范围1至3个月)。总体反应率为39%,其中5例完全缓解(18%),6例部分缓解(21%)。从开始治疗起,整个组的精算中位生存期为20.5个月(范围1至66个月)。目前有13名患者存活,其中8名无疾病和/或无进展。
使用这些严格标准,在免疫治疗前可以有效地进行肾切除术,而不会影响患者接受全身治疗的可能性。IL-2在采用这种方法治疗的患者中的活性令人鼓舞,证明了在适当选择的患者中考虑使用它是合理的。