Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜下前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结清扫术:扩大术式与改良术式的比较

Laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: comparison of the extended and modified techniques.

作者信息

Stone N N, Stock R G, Unger P

机构信息

Department of Urology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 1997 Nov;158(5):1891-4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(01)64161-2.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We compared the results of extended (obturator, hypogastric, common and external iliac nodes) to modified (obturator and hypogastric nodes only) laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 189 patients with stage T1 to T3 prostate cancer underwent modified (150) or extended (39) laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection for pelvic nodal assessment before definitive treatment.

RESULTS

Twice as many lymph nodes were removed via extended than modified laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection (mean 17:8 versus 9.3). The overall positivity rate was 23 of 189 lymph nodes (12.2%), including 14 of 150 (7.3%) for modified and 9 of 39 (23.1%) for extended dissection (p = 0.02). Two patients (22%) who underwent extended dissection had positive lymph nodes in the external iliac area. Patients who presented with the high risk features of prostate specific antigen (PSA) greater than 20 ng./ml., Gleason score 7 or greater, or stage T2b disease or greater had a 26.5% (p = 0.0002), 22% (p = 0.0006) or 16.4% (p = 0.003) likelihood of positive lymph nodes, respectively. For extended versus modified laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection node positivity in high risk patients was 27% versus 18.8% (p = 0.4), 30 versus 26.4% (p = 0.8) and 25.4 versus 14.6% (p = 0.17) for Gleason score 7 or greater, PSA greater than 20 ng./ml. and disease stage T2b to T3a, respectively. Patients who underwent the extended procedure had a higher complication rate (35.9 versus 2%, p < 0.0001). No laparotomy was required.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite yielding a 2-fold higher node count and higher node positivity rate, extended laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection offers no advantage over modified laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection for diagnosing positive lymph nodes when results are analyzed by prognostic factors. The extended procedure is associated with a much higher complication rate. In patients with the high risk features of PSA greater than 20 ng./ml., Gleason score 7 or greater and stage T2b to T3a disease modified laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection can be performed safely and effectively to help identify those who may benefit most from curative therapy.

摘要

目的

我们比较了在临床局限性前列腺癌患者中,扩大范围(闭孔、下腹下、总髂及髂外淋巴结)与改良范围(仅闭孔和下腹下淋巴结)腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术的结果。

材料与方法

总共189例T1至T3期前列腺癌患者在确定性治疗前接受了改良(150例)或扩大范围(39例)的腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术以进行盆腔淋巴结评估。

结果

扩大范围的腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术切除的淋巴结数量是改良术式的两倍(平均分别为17.8个和9.3个)。189个淋巴结中总体阳性率为23个(12.2%),其中改良术式150个中有14个(7.3%),扩大范围清扫术39个中有9个(23.1%)(p = 0.02)。接受扩大范围清扫术的2例患者(22%)在髂外区域有阳性淋巴结。呈现前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)大于20 ng/ml、Gleason评分7分及以上、或T2b期及以上疾病等高危特征的患者,其淋巴结阳性可能性分别为26.5%(p = 0.0002)、22%(p = 0.0006)或16.4%(p = 0.003)。对于高危患者,扩大范围与改良腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术的淋巴结阳性率在Gleason评分7分及以上时分别为27%和18.8%(p = 0.4),PSA大于20 ng/ml时分别为30%和26.4%(p = 0.8),疾病分期T2b至T3a时分别为25.4%和14.6%(p = 0.17)。接受扩大范围手术的患者并发症发生率更高(35.9%对2%,p < 0.0001)。无需开腹手术。

结论

尽管扩大范围的腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术切除的淋巴结数量多一倍且淋巴结阳性率更高,但按预后因素分析结果时,在诊断淋巴结阳性方面,扩大范围的腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术相比改良腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术并无优势。扩大范围手术的并发症发生率要高得多。对于有PSA大于20 ng/ml、Gleason评分7分及以上以及T2b至T3a期疾病等高危特征的患者,改良腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结清扫术可安全有效地进行,以帮助识别那些可能从根治性治疗中获益最大的患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验