Suppr超能文献

通过都保装置吸入丙酸氟替卡松粉与通过定量气雾剂吸入曲安奈德气雾剂治疗持续性哮喘患者的疗效比较

Fluticasone propionate powder administered through Diskhaler versus triamcinolone acetonide aerosol administered through metered-dose inhaler in patients with persistent asthma.

作者信息

Condemi J J, Chervinsky P, Goldstein M F, Ford L B, Berger W E, Ayars G H, Rogenes P R, Edwards L, Pepsin P J

机构信息

Allergy, Asthma, Immunology of Rochester, NY 14618, USA.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1997 Oct;100(4):467-74. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(97)70137-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Attempts to delineate efficacy and safety differences among inhaled corticosteroids have been difficult because of the lack of well-controlled, comparative studies reported in the medical literature.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study was conducted in 24 outpatient centers. A total of 291 male and female patients at least 12 years of age with asthma (FEV1 between 50% and 80% of predicted value), who had previously received maintenance therapy with beclomethasone dipropionate or triamcinolone acetonide, were switched to treatment with fluticasone propionate powder (250 microg twice daily), triamcinolone acetonide aerosol (200 microg four times daily), or placebo for 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Mean increase in FEV1 from baseline to end point was significantly (p = 0.009) greater in patients switched to treatment with fluticasone compared with patients switched to treatment with triamcinolone (0.27 L and 0.07 L, respectively). At end point, mean increase in morning peak expiratory flow from baseline was 21 L/min with fluticasone compared with mean decreases of 6 L/min and 28 L/min with triamcinolone and placebo, respectively (p < 0.001 vs triamcinolone and placebo). Supplemental rescue albuterol use decreased by 30% from baseline with fluticasone (p < 0.05 vs triamcinolone and placebo) compared with triamcinolone (6%) or placebo (increased by 50%). The percentage of patients withdrawn from the study because they met predefined lack-of-efficacy criteria was higher with placebo (60%) and triamcinolone (27%) than with fluticasone (17%). Incidence of adverse events and low morning plasma cortisol concentrations were similar across treatment groups except for oral candidiasis (p = 0.035, fluticasone vs placebo).

CONCLUSION

Fluticasone propionate powder twice daily (500 microg/day) was superior in efficacy to triamcinolone acetonide aerosol four times daily (800 microg/day) in patients with persistent asthma.

摘要

背景

由于医学文献中缺乏充分对照的比较研究,因此很难明确吸入性糖皮质激素之间在疗效和安全性上的差异。

方法

在24个门诊中心进行了一项随机、双盲、双模拟研究。共有291例年龄至少12岁的哮喘患者(第一秒用力呼气容积[FEV1]为预测值的50%至80%),这些患者此前接受过二丙酸倍氯米松或曲安奈德维持治疗,被转而接受丙酸氟替卡松粉(每日2次,每次250微克)、曲安奈德气雾剂(每日4次,每次200微克)或安慰剂治疗24周。

结果

与转而接受曲安奈德治疗的患者相比,转而接受氟替卡松治疗的患者从基线至终点时FEV1的平均增加幅度显著更大(p = 0.009)(分别为0.27升和0.07升)。在终点时,与曲安奈德和安慰剂相比,使用氟替卡松时早晨呼气峰值流速从基线的平均增加幅度为21升/分钟,而使用曲安奈德和安慰剂时分别平均降低6升/分钟和28升/分钟(与曲安奈德和安慰剂相比,p < 0.001)。与曲安奈德(6%)或安慰剂(增加50%)相比,使用氟替卡松时补充使用急救沙丁胺醇的量从基线减少了30%(与曲安奈德和安慰剂相比,p < 0.05)。因符合预先定义的无效标准而退出研究的患者百分比,安慰剂组(60%)和曲安奈德组(27%)高于氟替卡松组(17%)。除口腔念珠菌病外(氟替卡松与安慰剂相比,p = 0.03),各治疗组不良事件的发生率和早晨血浆皮质醇浓度较低的情况相似。

结论

对于持续性哮喘患者,每日2次(每日500微克)的丙酸氟替卡松粉在疗效上优于每日4次(每日800微克)的曲安奈德气雾剂。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验