Sakurai Y, Matsumura K, Iwatsubo T, Momose T
Department of Neurology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, and School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Japan.
Neurology. 1997 Oct;49(4):946-52. doi: 10.1212/wnl.49.4.946.
We present two patients with frontal pure agraphia more impaired for either kanji or kana (two separate writing systems for the Japanese language). The lesion of patient 1 (preferentially disturbed for kanji) was restricted to the foot of the middle frontal gyrus and the adjacent anterior precentral gyrus, whereas the lesion of patient 2 (preferentially disturbed for kana) included the posterior two thirds of the middle frontal gyrus. Both patients made agraphic errors (impaired recall) for kanji and agraphic or paragraphic errors (changing into other symbols) for kana. The double dissociation and the difference in types of errors between kanji writing and kana writing suggests that there are two pathways involved in writing, i.e., a morphologic route and a phonologic route. We concluded that damage to the morphologic route may yield agraphia for kanji and that damage to the phonologic route may yield agraphia for kana.
我们报告了两名患有额叶纯失写症的患者,他们对汉字或假名(日语的两种不同书写系统)的书写障碍更为严重。患者1(对汉字的书写障碍更为明显)的病变局限于额中回的底部及相邻的中央前回前部,而患者2(对假名的书写障碍更为明显)的病变包括额中回的后三分之二。两名患者在书写汉字时均出现失写错误(回忆受损),在书写假名时出现失写或书写错乱错误(变成其他符号)。汉字书写和假名书写之间的双重分离以及错误类型的差异表明,书写涉及两条通路,即形态学通路和语音学通路。我们得出结论,形态学通路受损可能导致汉字失写,语音学通路受损可能导致假名失写。