• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Stimulus modality and stimulus-response compatibility in absolute identification.

作者信息

Lacouture Y, Lacerte D

机构信息

Laboratoire de Recherche en Psychologie Cognitive, Ecole de Psychologie, Université Laval, Québec.

出版信息

Can J Exp Psychol. 1997 Jun;51(2):165-70. doi: 10.1037/1196-1961.51.2.165.

DOI:10.1037/1196-1961.51.2.165
PMID:9340076
Abstract

Accuracy and response time (RT) were measured in the absolute identification (AI) of 10 unidimensional perfectly pairwise discriminable stimuli. One group of 20 subjects performed a visual AI task involving line segments of variable length. A second group of 20 subjects participated in an auditory task with the stimuli composed of pure tones of variable intensity. Subjects performed the task under two conditions: a spatially compatible and a spatially incompatible stimulus-response mapping. Results showed greater accuracy for the visual modality and longer RT for the incompatible mapping. The experimental factors did not substantially alter the bowing observed when performance was plotted according to the ordinal position of the stimuli. The data do not support the hypothesis that the bow effect is attributable to motor programming or motor adjustment stages.

摘要

相似文献

1
Stimulus modality and stimulus-response compatibility in absolute identification.
Can J Exp Psychol. 1997 Jun;51(2):165-70. doi: 10.1037/1196-1961.51.2.165.
2
The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.视觉任务难度和注意方向对以失配负波为指标的听觉变化检测的影响。
Brain Res. 2006 Mar 17;1078(1):112-30. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2005.12.125. Epub 2006 Feb 21.
3
Cross-modal compatibility effects with visual-spatial and auditory-verbal stimulus and response sets.
Percept Psychophys. 1994 Jan;55(1):42-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03206879.
4
Stimulus spacing effects in duration perception are larger for auditory stimuli: data and a model.听觉刺激在时长感知中的刺激间隔效应更大:数据与模型
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Mar;147:97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.017. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
5
Dissociating stimulus-response compatibility and modality compatibility in task switching.在任务切换中区分刺激-反应兼容性和模态兼容性
Mem Cognit. 2022 Oct;50(7):1546-1562. doi: 10.3758/s13421-022-01276-4. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
6
Modality-specific selective attention attenuates multisensory integration.特定模态的选择性注意会减弱多感官整合。
Exp Brain Res. 2008 Jan;184(1):39-52. doi: 10.1007/s00221-007-1080-3. Epub 2007 Aug 8.
7
The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching.线索提示任务切换中跨通道注意准备与通道兼容性的相互作用。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2019 Apr;72(4):955-965. doi: 10.1177/1747021818771836. Epub 2018 May 7.
8
The role of sensory-motor modality compatibility in language processing.感觉运动模态兼容性在语言处理中的作用。
Psychol Res. 2016 Mar;80(2):212-23. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0661-1. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
9
The psychological refractory period and the effect of stimulus discriminability.心理不应期与刺激可辨别性的影响
Am J Psychol. 1973 Mar;86(1):103-13.
10
Increased visual task difficulty enhances attentional capture by both visual and auditory distractor stimuli.视觉任务难度增加会增强视觉和听觉干扰刺激对注意力的吸引。
Brain Res. 2017 Jun 1;1664:55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.03.026. Epub 2017 Apr 1.