• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性心肌梗死中阿替普酶持续输注与双剂量推注给药的比较。

A comparison of continuous infusion of alteplase with double-bolus administration for acute myocardial infarction.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1997 Oct 16;337(16):1124-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199710163371604.

DOI:10.1056/NEJM199710163371604
PMID:9340504
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Accelerated infusion of alteplase (tissue plasminogen activator) over a period of 90 minutes induces more rapid lysis of coronary-artery thrombi than a 3-hour infusion. With two bolus doses of alteplase, further shortening the duration of administration, complete reperfusion was achieved in more than 85 percent of the patients in initial angiographic studies. We tested the hypothesis that double-bolus alteplase is at least as effective as accelerated infusion.

METHODS

In 398 hospitals, 7169 patients with acute myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to weight-adjusted, accelerated infusion of 100 mg of alteplase or to a bolus of 50 mg of alteplase over a period of 1 to 3 minutes followed 30 minutes later by a second bolus of 50 mg (or 40 mg for patients who weighed less than 60 kg). The primary end point was death from any cause at 30 days. The trial was stopped prematurely because of concern about the safety of the double-bolus injection.

RESULTS

Thirty-day mortality was higher in the double-bolus group than in the accelerated-infusion group: 7.98 percent as compared with 7.53 percent. The absolute difference was 0.44 percent, with a one-sided 95 percent upper boundary of 1.49 percent, which exceeded the prespecified upper limit of 0.40 percent to indicate equivalence in 30-day mortality between the two regimens. The respective rates of any stroke and of hemorrhagic stroke were 1.92 and 1.12 percent after double-bolus alteplase, as compared with 1.53 and 0.81 percent after an accelerated infusion of alteplase (P=0.24 and P=0.23, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Double-bolus alteplase was not shown to be equivalent, according to the prespecified criteria, to accelerated infusion with regard to 30-day mortality. There was also a slightly higher rate of intracranial hemorrhage with the double-bolus method. Therefore, accelerated infusion of alteplase over a period of 90 minutes remains the preferred regimen.

摘要

背景

与3小时输注相比,在90分钟内加速输注阿替普酶(组织纤溶酶原激活剂)能更快速地溶解冠状动脉血栓。在最初的血管造影研究中,使用两次推注剂量的阿替普酶,进一步缩短给药时间,超过85%的患者实现了完全再灌注。我们检验了双推注阿替普酶至少与加速输注一样有效的假设。

方法

在398家医院,7169例急性心肌梗死患者被随机分配接受按体重调整的100mg阿替普酶加速输注,或在1至3分钟内推注50mg阿替普酶,30分钟后再推注50mg(体重小于60kg的患者为40mg)。主要终点是30天时任何原因导致的死亡。由于担心双推注注射的安全性,试验提前终止。

结果

双推注组30天死亡率高于加速输注组:分别为7.98%和7.53%。绝对差异为0.44%,单侧95%上限为1.49%,超过了预先设定的0.40%上限,该上限用于表明两种方案30天死亡率的等效性。双推注阿替普酶后任何卒中及出血性卒中的发生率分别为1.92%和1.12%,而加速输注阿替普酶后分别为1.53%和0.81%(P分别为0.24和0.23)。

结论

根据预先设定的标准,双推注阿替普酶在30天死亡率方面与加速输注不等效。双推注方法导致的颅内出血发生率也略高。因此,90分钟内加速输注阿替普酶仍是首选方案。

相似文献

1
A comparison of continuous infusion of alteplase with double-bolus administration for acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死中阿替普酶持续输注与双剂量推注给药的比较。
N Engl J Med. 1997 Oct 16;337(16):1124-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199710163371604.
2
A comparison of reteplase with alteplase for acute myocardial infarction.瑞替普酶与阿替普酶治疗急性心肌梗死的比较。
N Engl J Med. 1997 Oct 16;337(16):1118-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199710163371603.
3
An angiographic assessment of alteplase: double-bolus and front-loaded infusion regimens in myocardial infarction. DouBLE Study Investigators. Double Bolus Lysis Efficacy.
Am Heart J. 1998 Oct;136(4 Pt 1):741-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(98)70024-9.
4
Patency trials with reteplase (r-PA): what do they tell us?瑞替普酶(r-PA)通畅性试验:它们告诉了我们什么?
Am J Cardiol. 1996 Dec 19;78(12A):16-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00738-2.
5
Randomized comparison of coronary thrombolysis achieved with double-bolus reteplase (recombinant plasminogen activator) and front-loaded, accelerated alteplase (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator) in patients with acute myocardial infarction. The RAPID II Investigators.双推注瑞替普酶(重组纤溶酶原激活剂)与前负荷加速阿替普酶(重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂)用于急性心肌梗死患者冠状动脉溶栓的随机对照比较。RAPID II研究组。
Circulation. 1996 Sep 1;94(5):891-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.5.891.
6
Single-bolus tenecteplase compared with front-loaded alteplase in acute myocardial infarction: the ASSENT-2 double-blind randomised trial.急性心肌梗死中单次推注替奈普酶与先负荷剂量阿替普酶的比较:ASSENT-2双盲随机试验
Lancet. 1999 Aug 28;354(9180):716-22. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)07403-6.
7
Randomised, double-blind comparison of reteplase double-bolus administration with streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction (INJECT): trial to investigate equivalence. International Joint Efficacy Comparison of Thrombolytics.瑞替普酶双剂量给药与链激酶治疗急性心肌梗死的随机双盲比较研究(INJECT):等效性研究。溶栓药物国际联合疗效比较研究。
Lancet. 1995 Aug 5;346(8971):329-36.
8
Intravenous NPA for the treatment of infarcting myocardium early; InTIME-II, a double-blind comparison of single-bolus lanoteplase vs accelerated alteplase for the treatment of patients with acute myocardial infarction.早期静脉注射NPA治疗梗死心肌;InTIME-II,单次推注兰替普酶与加速使用阿替普酶治疗急性心肌梗死患者的双盲比较。
Eur Heart J. 2000 Dec;21(24):2005-13. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2498.
9
More rapid, complete, and stable coronary thrombolysis with bolus administration of reteplase compared with alteplase infusion in acute myocardial infarction. RAPID Investigators.与急性心肌梗死中阿替普酶静脉输注相比,瑞替普酶大剂量推注可实现更快速、完全和稳定的冠状动脉溶栓。RAPID研究组。
Circulation. 1995 Jun 1;91(11):2725-32. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.91.11.2725.
10
Optimal thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction--bolus administration.急性心肌梗死的最佳溶栓策略——推注给药
QJM. 1998 Nov;91(11):719-25. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/91.11.719.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-inferiority trials in cardiology: what clinicians need to know.心脏病学中的非劣效性试验:临床医生需要了解的内容。
Heart. 2020 Jan;106(2):99-104. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2019-315772. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
2
The evolution of recombinant thrombolytics: Current status and future directions.重组溶栓剂的演变:现状与未来方向。
Bioengineered. 2017 Jul 4;8(4):331-358. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2016.1229718. Epub 2016 Oct 3.
3
Meta-analysis of randomized phase II trials to inform subsequent phase III decisions.随机II期试验的荟萃分析,为后续III期决策提供参考。
Trials. 2014 Sep 3;15:346. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-346.
4
Watching, but not waiting: vascular neurology perspective on the disparate regulatory pathways for stroke.观察而非等待:血管神经病学对中风不同调节途径的观点
J Neurointerv Surg. 2015 Jun;7(6):393-4. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011146. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
5
Risks and Benefits of Thrombolytic, Antiplatelet, and Anticoagulant Therapies for ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Systematic Review.溶栓、抗血小板和抗凝治疗对ST段抬高型心肌梗死的风险与获益:系统评价
ISRN Cardiol. 2014 Feb 6;2014:416253. doi: 10.1155/2014/416253. eCollection 2014.
6
[STEMI guidelines 2008--Do they influence today's myocardial infarction treatment strategies in rural areas?].
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2010 Jan;160(1-2):54-60. doi: 10.1007/s10354-009-0739-8.
7
Optimizing the use of thrombolytics in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.优化ST段抬高型心肌梗死中溶栓药物的使用。
Drugs. 2009 Oct 1;69(14):1945-66. doi: 10.2165/11317670-000000000-00000.
8
Poor outcomes after fibrinolytic therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: impact of age (a meta-analysis of a decade of trials).ST段抬高型心肌梗死溶栓治疗后的不良预后:年龄的影响(十年试验的荟萃分析)
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2006 Apr;21(2):119-29. doi: 10.1007/s11239-006-5485-9.
9
Efficacy and safety of a new streptokinase regimen with enoxaparin in acute myocardial infarction.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2003 Jun;15(3):171-9. doi: 10.1023/B:THRO.0000011372.26594.01.
10
Bivalirudin: a review of its potential place in the management of acute coronary syndromes.比伐卢定:对其在急性冠脉综合征管理中潜在地位的综述
Drugs. 2002;62(5):841-70. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200262050-00008.