• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞替普酶与阿替普酶治疗急性心肌梗死的比较。

A comparison of reteplase with alteplase for acute myocardial infarction.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1997 Oct 16;337(16):1118-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199710163371603.

DOI:10.1056/NEJM199710163371603
PMID:9340503
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reteplase (recombinant plasminogen activator), a mutant of alteplase tissue plasminogen activator, has a longer half-life than its parent molecule and produced superior angiographic results in pilot studies of acute myocardial infarction. In this large clinical trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of these two thrombolytic agents.

METHODS

A total of 15,059 patients from 807 hospitals in 20 countries who presented within 6 hours after the onset of symptoms with ST-segment elevation or bundle-branch block were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive reteplase, in two bolus doses or 10 MU each given 30 minutes apart, or an accelerated infusion of alteplase, up to 100 mg infused over a period of 90 minutes. The primary hypothesis was that mortality at 30 days would be significantly lower with reteplase.

RESULTS

The mortality rate at 30 days was 7.47 percent for reteplase and 7.24 percent for alteplase (adjusted P=0.54; odds ratio, 1.03; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.91 to 1.18). The 95 percent confidence interval for the absolute difference in mortality rates was -1.1 to 0.66 percent. Stroke occurred in 1.64 percent of patients treated with reteplase and in 1.79 percent of those treated with alteplase (P= 0.50). The respective rates of the combined end point of death or nonfatal, disabling stroke were 7.89 percent and 7.91 percent (P=0.97; odds ratio, 1.0; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.88 to 1.13).

CONCLUSIONS

As compared with an accelerated infusion of alteplase, reteplase, although easier to administer, did not provide any additional survival benefit in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Other results, particularly for the combined end point of death or nonfatal, disabling stroke, were remarkably similar for the two plasminogen activators.

摘要

背景

瑞替普酶(重组纤溶酶原激活剂)是阿替普酶(组织纤溶酶原激活剂)的一种突变体,其半衰期比母体分子更长,并且在急性心肌梗死的初步研究中产生了更好的血管造影结果。在这项大型临床试验中,我们比较了这两种溶栓药物的疗效和安全性。

方法

来自20个国家807家医院的15059例患者在症状发作后6小时内出现ST段抬高或束支传导阻滞,按2:1的比例随机分配,接受瑞替普酶治疗,分两次推注,每次10MU,间隔30分钟,或加速输注阿替普酶,在90分钟内输注高达100mg。主要假设是瑞替普酶治疗30天时的死亡率会显著降低。

结果

瑞替普酶治疗30天的死亡率为7.47%,阿替普酶为7.24%(校正P=0.54;优势比,1.03;95%置信区间,0.91至1.18)。死亡率绝对差异的95%置信区间为-1.1至0.66%。接受瑞替普酶治疗的患者中有1.64%发生卒中,接受阿替普酶治疗的患者中有1.79%发生卒中(P=0.50)。死亡或非致死性致残性卒中联合终点的发生率分别为7.89%和7.91%(P=0.97;优势比,1.0;95%置信区间,0.88至1.13)。

结论

与加速输注阿替普酶相比,瑞替普酶虽然给药更容易,但在急性心肌梗死治疗中并未提供任何额外的生存益处。两种纤溶酶原激活剂的其他结果,特别是死亡或非致死性致残性卒中联合终点的结果非常相似。

相似文献

1
A comparison of reteplase with alteplase for acute myocardial infarction.瑞替普酶与阿替普酶治疗急性心肌梗死的比较。
N Engl J Med. 1997 Oct 16;337(16):1118-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199710163371603.
2
Randomized comparison of coronary thrombolysis achieved with double-bolus reteplase (recombinant plasminogen activator) and front-loaded, accelerated alteplase (recombinant tissue plasminogen activator) in patients with acute myocardial infarction. The RAPID II Investigators.双推注瑞替普酶(重组纤溶酶原激活剂)与前负荷加速阿替普酶(重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂)用于急性心肌梗死患者冠状动脉溶栓的随机对照比较。RAPID II研究组。
Circulation. 1996 Sep 1;94(5):891-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.5.891.
3
Randomised, double-blind comparison of reteplase double-bolus administration with streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction (INJECT): trial to investigate equivalence. International Joint Efficacy Comparison of Thrombolytics.瑞替普酶双剂量给药与链激酶治疗急性心肌梗死的随机双盲比较研究(INJECT):等效性研究。溶栓药物国际联合疗效比较研究。
Lancet. 1995 Aug 5;346(8971):329-36.
4
Patency trials with reteplase (r-PA): what do they tell us?瑞替普酶(r-PA)通畅性试验:它们告诉了我们什么?
Am J Cardiol. 1996 Dec 19;78(12A):16-9. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00738-2.
5
A comparison of continuous infusion of alteplase with double-bolus administration for acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死中阿替普酶持续输注与双剂量推注给药的比较。
N Engl J Med. 1997 Oct 16;337(16):1124-30. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199710163371604.
6
Reteplase. A review of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the management of acute myocardial infarction.瑞替普酶。其药理学特性及治疗急性心肌梗死临床疗效的综述。
Drugs. 1996 Oct;52(4):589-605. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199652040-00012.
7
Comparisons of characteristics and outcomes among women and men with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy. GUSTO-I investigators.接受溶栓治疗的急性心肌梗死女性和男性患者的特征及预后比较。GUSTO-I研究组。
JAMA. 1996 Mar 13;275(10):777-82.
8
A clinical trial comparing primary coronary angioplasty with tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial infarction.一项比较原发性冠状动脉血管成形术与组织纤溶酶原激活剂治疗急性心肌梗死的临床试验。
N Engl J Med. 1997 Jun 5;336(23):1621-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199706053362301.
9
Clinical trials in thrombolytic therapy: what do they tell us? INJECT 6-month outcomes data.溶栓治疗的临床试验:它们告诉了我们什么?INJECT研究6个月的结果数据。
Am J Cardiol. 1996 Dec 19;78(12A):20-3. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00739-4.
10
The role of thrombolytic drugs in the management of myocardial infarction. Comparative clinical trials.溶栓药物在心肌梗死治疗中的作用。比较临床试验。
Eur Heart J. 1996 Dec;17 Suppl F:9-15. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/17.suppl_f.9.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes of Time to Treatment With Reteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke: The RAISE Trial Subgroup.瑞替普酶治疗急性缺血性卒中的治疗时间结果:RAISE试验亚组
JACC Asia. 2025 Apr;5(4):584-592. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2024.12.010. Epub 2025 Feb 11.
2
Tenecteplase vs Reteplase in Patients with Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Cohort Study.替奈普酶与瑞替普酶治疗急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的回顾性队列研究
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2025 Jan-Dec;31:10760296251316876. doi: 10.1177/10760296251316876.
3
Thrombolytic therapy for patients with acute ischemic stroke: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials.
急性缺血性中风患者的溶栓治疗:随机试验的系统评价和网状荟萃分析
Front Neurol. 2025 Jan 7;15:1490476. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1490476. eCollection 2024.
4
Reteplase versus alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke within 4.5 hours (RAISE): rationale and design of a multicentre, prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint, controlled phase 3 non-inferiority trial.瑞替普酶与阿替普酶治疗 4.5 小时内急性缺血性脑卒中(RAISE):一项多中心、前瞻性、随机、开放标签、盲终点、对照 3 期非劣效性试验的原理和设计。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2024 Nov 5;9(5):568-573. doi: 10.1136/svn-2023-003035.
5
Symmetrical peripheral gangrene: potential mechanisms and therapeutic approaches in severe COVID-19.对称性周围坏疽:重症新型冠状病毒肺炎的潜在机制及治疗方法
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Nov 29;10:1280625. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1280625. eCollection 2023.
6
Nebulized Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator (rt-PA) for Acute COVID-19-Induced Respiratory Failure: An Exploratory Proof-of-Concept Trial.雾化重组组织型纤溶酶原激活剂(rt-PA)治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)所致急性呼吸衰竭:一项探索性概念验证试验
J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 8;12(18):5848. doi: 10.3390/jcm12185848.
7
A Systematic Review of the Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase Versus Streptokinase in the Management of Myocardial Infarction in Developing Countries.替奈普酶与链激酶在发展中国家心肌梗死治疗中疗效与安全性的系统评价
Cureus. 2023 Aug 25;15(8):e44125. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44125. eCollection 2023 Aug.
8
Application and risk prediction of thrombolytic therapy in cardio-cerebrovascular diseases: a review.溶栓治疗在心血管疾病中的应用及风险预测:综述
Thromb J. 2023 Sep 4;21(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12959-023-00532-0.
9
The Role of Matrix Metalloproteinases in Hemorrhagic Transformation in the Treatment of Stroke with Tissue Plasminogen Activator.基质金属蛋白酶在组织型纤溶酶原激活剂治疗中风后出血转化中的作用
J Pers Med. 2023 Jul 23;13(7):1175. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071175.
10
Response Surface Methodology to Optimize the Expression Efficiency of Recombinant Reteplase.响应面法优化重组瑞替普酶表达效率
Iran J Biotechnol. 2023 Apr 1;21(2):e3288. doi: 10.30498/ijb.2023.330285.3288. eCollection 2023 Apr.