[Physiologic and pathologic patterns of reaction to silicone breast implants].

Local morphological reaction patterns on breast implants can be of high significance as possible starting point for controversely discussed systemic immune response triggered by silicon or silicone. Therefore, the collagenous capsules of 149 explanted mammoplasty prostheses were examined macroscopically, under a scanning electron microscope and light-microscopically using antibodies to the macrophage antigen CD68, vimentin, muscle actin, and the proliferation antigen MIB1, and were then correlated with anamnestic data (implanted type of prosthesis, indication for im- or explantation). According to our examinations, the in-vivo durability of the prostheses' shells is considerably decreasing with the expansion of their surfaces. Regardless of the type of the prostheses' surface regularly a chronic-proliferating inflammation pattern could be identified in the periprosthetic capsulectomy specimens starting with a synovial metaplasia of proliferating CD-68-negative and vimentin-positive mesenchymal cells in the area surrounding the implants and ending by its transformation into a stage of dense hyaline collagenous fibrous tissue after an advanced implantation period (> 2 years). By this, the texturing of the prosthesis surface modifies only the course, but not the quality of the chronically fibrosing inflammation. Bleeding of prosthesis as well as the incorporation of the polyurethane-foam coating of different prosthesis types into the periprosthetic breast capsule lead to a significant lymphoplasmacytic infiltration, partly with participation of local vessels as defined in a "silicone vasculitis". Morphological signs of an at least local immune response are detectable in 8.3% of the examined fibrotic capsules even without a morphologically identifiable foreign-body embedding. They can be possibly referred to- as well as the complete absence of hyaline collagenous fibrous tissue in 30% of the cases-a yet not causally clarified, inter-individually different susceptibility of the implant bearers. Only the systematic registration of the above-mentioned morphological reaction patterns in a "prosthesis-passport" together with the additional clinical observation of the patients can ensure in future the realistic estimation of potential health risks caused by silicone breast implants.