Hughes C, Sunderji R, Gin K
Vancouver Hospital and Health Sciences Centre, British Columbia.
Can J Cardiol. 1997 Sep;13(9):839-42.
To review comparative studies evaluating oral propafenone for restoring sinus rhythm in recent onset atrial fibrillation.
A MEDLINE search of the English-language literature (1966 to 1996) along with any referenced articles not identified by MEDLINE.
Because intravenous propafenone is not marketed in Canada, only studies evaluating oral propafenone were included. Studies were selected if they compared oral propafenone with placebo or other antiarrhythmic agents for converting recent onset atrial fibrillation to normal sinus rhythm.
Propafenone is often used as a first-line agent for pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. In earlier studies, the efficacy of propafenone in restoring sinus rhythm was reported to be low with conversion rates of 6% to 62%. Many of these studies were noncomparative and often included patients with refractory, chronic atrial fibrillation or employed suboptimal doses of propafenone. More recently propafenone has been evaluated in the treatment of recent onset atrial fibrillation by using a single 600 mg oral loading dose. Success rates of 76% at 8 h and 83% at 12 h following the loading dose are reported. The incidence of atrial flutter during active treatment was similar to that with placebo, with the majority exhibiting 2:1 or greater atrioventricular conduction ratios and heart rates 150 beats/min or less.
A single 600 mg oral dose of propafenone is highly effective at restoring sinus rhythm in patients with acute onset atrial fibrillation with few adverse effects. The small studies reviewed cannot lead to definitive conclusions about the safety of propafenone without prior administration of agents for rate control.
回顾评估口服普罗帕酮恢复近期发作房颤患者窦性心律的比较性研究。
检索MEDLINE英文文献数据库(1966年至1996年)以及MEDLINE未检索到的所有参考文献。
由于静脉用普罗帕酮在加拿大未上市,故仅纳入评估口服普罗帕酮的研究。若研究将口服普罗帕酮与安慰剂或其他抗心律失常药物进行比较,以将近期发作房颤转为正常窦性心律,则纳入该研究。
普罗帕酮常被用作房颤药物复律的一线药物。在早期研究中,普罗帕酮恢复窦性心律的疗效据报道较低,转复率为6%至62%。这些研究中有许多是非对照性的,且常纳入难治性慢性房颤患者或使用了次优剂量的普罗帕酮。最近,通过单次口服600mg负荷剂量对普罗帕酮治疗近期发作房颤进行了评估。据报道,负荷剂量后8小时成功率为76%,12小时成功率为83%。积极治疗期间房扑的发生率与安慰剂相似,大多数表现为2:1或更高的房室传导比例且心率在150次/分钟或更低。
单次口服600mg普罗帕酮对急性发作房颤患者恢复窦性心律非常有效,且不良反应较少。所回顾的小型研究在未预先给予心率控制药物的情况下,无法得出关于普罗帕酮安全性的确切结论。