Floman Y, Bar-On E, Mosheiff R, Mirovsky Y, Robin G C, Ramu N
Spinal Surgery Unit, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel.
J Pediatr Orthop B. 1997 Oct;6(4):260-5. doi: 10.1097/01202412-199710000-00008.
Twenty patients treated for eosinophilic granuloma of the spine were studied. Only 40% demonstrated the classical radiographic picture of vertebra plana. In 60% a lytic lesion of the vertebral body or the posterior elements was found. Seven patients underwent surgery; the indications were neurological involvement or failure of the biopsy to disclose the diagnosis. At an average follow-up period of 7 years, 17 patients are well and alive with no residual spinal pain, neurological compromise, recurrent disease, or extraskeletal involvement. Vertebral body collapse underwent some regeneration but did not regain full body height. In several patients this resulted in a local deformity. In patients with unifocal spinal eosinophilic granuloma, watchful observation with no treatment other than spinal support is warranted. In patients with neural involvement or multifocal lesions, a more active treatment, including surgery, may be indicated.
