Haffajee A D, Cugini M A, Dibart S, Smith C, Kent R L, Socransky S S
Department of Periodontology, Forsyth Dental Center, Boston, MA, USA.
J Clin Periodontol. 1997 Oct;24(10):767-76. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1997.tb00195.x.
In a previous report, it was shown that scaling and root planing (SRP) decreased mean pocket depth and attachment level in subjects with adult periodontitis, as well as the levels and prevalence of Bacteroides forsythus, Porphyromonas gingivalis and Treponema denticola. However, a subset of subjects in that study exhibited mean loss of attachment following SRP. The purpose of the present investigation was to seek clinical and microbiological differences between subjects who responded well or poorly to SRP. 57 subjects with adult periodontitis were treated by full-mouth SRP under local anaesthetic. Clinical assessments of plaque, redness, suppuration, BOP, pocket depth and attachment level were made at 6 sites per tooth prior to and 3 months post-SRP. Attachment level measurements were repeated at each visit and differences in means between visits used to assess change. 18 subjects showed mean attachment loss 3 months post-SRP (poor response group), while 39 showed mean attachment level gain (good response group). The prevalence and levels of 40 subgingival taxa in subgingival plaque samples from the mesiobuccal site of each tooth (maximum 28 sites) in each subject prior to and 3 months post-SRP were assessed using checker-board DNA-DNA hybridization. The prevalence of each species was computed for each subject and averaged across subjects in the 2 treatment-response groups at each visit. Differences between groups were sought using the Mann-Whitney test. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 response groups in any clinical parameter prior to therapy. Subjects in the good response group showed more attachment level gain at sites with baseline pocket depths of < 4 mm, 4-6 and > 6 mm than poor response subjects. Of 40 species evaluated, A. naeslundii genospecies 2 (A. viscosus), T. denticola, C. gracilis and C. rectus were significantly higher and more prevalent pre-therapy in the good response subjects. Mean attachment level change post SRP could be predicted using multiple linear regression with A. naeslundii genospecies 2 (A. viscosus) and T. denticola as the predictor variables (r2 = 0.373, p < 0.00001). Sites that gained > or = 2 mm of attachment post therapy showed a significant decrease in the counts of P. gingivalis (7.5 +/- 3.5 to 0.2 +/- 0.2 x 10(5)), T. denticola (8.2 +/- 3.5 to 1.8 +/- 1.1 x 10(5)) and B. forsythus (11.1 +/- 5.7 to 0.3 +/- 0.2 x 10(5)). The data of the present investigation indicate that SRP is most effective in subjects and sites with high levels of the subgingival species that this therapy affects.
在之前的一份报告中显示,龈上洁治和根面平整术(SRP)可降低成人牙周炎患者的平均牙周袋深度和附着水平,以及福赛坦氏菌、牙龈卟啉单胞菌和具核梭杆菌的水平和患病率。然而,该研究中的一部分受试者在接受SRP后出现了平均附着丧失。本研究的目的是寻找对SRP反应良好或不佳的受试者之间的临床和微生物学差异。57例成人牙周炎患者在局部麻醉下接受全口SRP治疗。在SRP治疗前和治疗后3个月,对每颗牙齿的6个部位进行菌斑、发红、化脓、探诊出血(BOP)、牙周袋深度和附着水平的临床评估。每次就诊时重复测量附着水平,并通过两次就诊的平均值差异来评估变化。18例受试者在SRP治疗后3个月出现平均附着丧失(反应不佳组),而39例受试者出现平均附着水平增加(反应良好组)。使用棋盘式DNA-DNA杂交技术评估每个受试者每颗牙齿近中颊侧部位(最多28个部位)龈下菌斑样本中40种龈下微生物分类群在SRP治疗前和治疗后3个月的患病率和水平。计算每个受试者每种微生物的患病率,并在每次就诊时对两个治疗反应组的受试者进行平均。使用曼-惠特尼检验寻找组间差异。治疗前,两个反应组在任何临床参数上均无统计学显著差异。反应良好组的受试者在基线牙周袋深度<4mm、4 - 6mm和>6mm的部位比反应不佳的受试者有更多的附着水平增加。在评估的40种微生物中,在治疗前,粘性放线菌基因种2(粘性放线菌)、具核梭杆菌、纤细弯曲菌和直肠弯曲菌在反应良好的受试者中显著更高且更普遍。使用粘性放线菌基因种2(粘性放线菌)和具核梭杆菌作为预测变量,通过多元线性回归可以预测SRP治疗后平均附着水平的变化(r2 = 0.373,p < 0.00001)。治疗后附着增加≥2mm的部位,牙龈卟啉单胞菌(7.5 +/- 3.5至0.2 +/- 0.2 x 10(5))、具核梭杆菌(8.2 +/- 3.5至1.8 +/- 1.1 x 10(5))和福赛坦氏菌(11.1 +/- 5.7至0.3 +/- 0.2 x 10(5))的计数显著减少。本研究数据表明,SRP对该治疗所影响的龈下微生物水平较高的受试者和部位最为有效。