• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

宫颈评分在预测引产成功结局中的价值。

The value of the cervical score in predicting successful outcome of labor induction.

作者信息

Williams M C, Krammer J, O'Brien W F

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida, Tampa 33606, USA.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Nov;90(5):784-9. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00415-8.

DOI:10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00415-8
PMID:9351765
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare cervical dilation and the Bishop score as correlates of successful labor induction and vaginal delivery and to determine whether the prognosis of post-ripening cervical characteristics varies with the method of ripening used.

METHODS

Four hundred forty-three women with Bishop scores less than 9 who required induction of labor were assigned randomly to cervical ripening with prostaglandin E2 gel or hygroscopic dilation. The Bishop score and its component characteristics were evaluated as univariate correlates of successful induction of labor and vaginal delivery and then were assessed using logistic regression to adjust for other maternal and fetal factors. The differences in the association between method of ripening and successful labor induction were evaluated relative to pre-ripening and post-ripening cervical examination characteristics.

RESULTS

Cervical dilation was a better correlate of successful labor induction and vaginal delivery than was the Bishop score, even after exclusion of patients with initial Bishop scores greater than 6 and dilation greater than 3.0. Both ripening methods yielded similar success in labor induction and vaginal delivery, but when categorized by post-ripening cervical examinations, patients undergoing hygroscopic ripening had lower rates of successful labor induction and vaginal delivery.

CONCLUSION

Cervical dilation is a better predictor of successful labor induction and vaginal delivery than either the Bishop score or any other Bishop score component characteristic. The likelihood of successful labor induction and vaginal delivery based on post-ripening cervical characteristics varies by the ripening method used.

摘要

目的

比较宫颈扩张和Bishop评分作为引产成功及阴道分娩相关因素的情况,并确定成熟后宫颈特征的预后是否因所用的成熟方法而异。

方法

443名Bishop评分低于9且需要引产的女性被随机分配接受前列腺素E2凝胶宫颈成熟或水囊扩张。将Bishop评分及其组成特征作为引产成功和阴道分娩的单变量相关因素进行评估,然后使用逻辑回归分析来调整其他母体和胎儿因素。相对于成熟前和成熟后的宫颈检查特征,评估成熟方法与引产成功之间关联的差异。

结果

即使排除初始Bishop评分大于6且宫颈扩张大于3.0的患者,宫颈扩张仍是引产成功和阴道分娩比Bishop评分更好的相关因素。两种成熟方法在引产和阴道分娩方面成功率相似,但根据成熟后宫颈检查进行分类时,接受水囊成熟的患者引产成功和阴道分娩的发生率较低。

结论

宫颈扩张比Bishop评分或任何其他Bishop评分组成特征更能预测引产成功和阴道分娩。基于成熟后宫颈特征的引产成功和阴道分娩的可能性因所用的成熟方法而异。

相似文献

1
The value of the cervical score in predicting successful outcome of labor induction.宫颈评分在预测引产成功结局中的价值。
Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Nov;90(5):784-9. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00415-8.
2
Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term.经阴道超声测量仰卧位和直立位宫颈长度与 Bishop 评分在预测足月引产成功中的比较
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Feb;33(2):213-20. doi: 10.1002/uog.6219.
3
[Cervical maturation and induction of labor with PgE2 gel. Authors' experience].[使用前列腺素E2凝胶促进宫颈成熟及引产。作者经验]
Minerva Ginecol. 1997 Oct;49(10):427-32.
4
Intravaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone as cervical ripening and labor-inducing agents.阴道内使用米索前列醇与地诺前列酮作为宫颈成熟和引产药物的比较。
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Feb;83(2):244-7.
5
Methods for cervical ripening and induction of labor.宫颈成熟及引产方法。
Am Fam Physician. 2003 May 15;67(10):2123-8.
6
Prediction of cervical response to prostaglandin E2 using fetal fibronectin.利用胎儿纤连蛋白预测宫颈对前列腺素E2的反应
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999 Nov;78(10):861-5.
7
[Cervical maturation by repeated applications of prostaglandin E2 gel. 186 cases].[通过反复应用前列腺素E2凝胶促进宫颈成熟。186例]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 1997;26(4):386-94.
8
Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.阴道用米索前列醇与宫颈用地诺前列酮用于促宫颈成熟及引产的比较。
Tenn Med. 2001 Jan;94(1):25-7.
9
Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.阴道pH值对米索前列醇促宫颈成熟及引产效果的影响
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Jun;182(6):1616-9. doi: 10.1067/mob.2000.107441.
10
Induction of labor in the nineties: conquering the unfavorable cervix.九十年代的引产:攻克宫颈条件不佳的难题。
Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Aug;90(2):235-9. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00259-7.

引用本文的文献

1
[Cesarean section risk assessment for pregnant women at term].[足月孕妇剖宫产风险评估]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2025 Mar 3;63(2):e6357. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14616915.
2
Recommendations for strain elastography of the uterine cervix.宫颈应变弹性成像技术的推荐意见。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Oct;310(4):2023-2033. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07693-x. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
3
Mechanical methods for induction of labour.机械方法引产。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 30;3(3):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub4.
4
Prevalence and risk factors for caesarean delivery following labor induction at a tertiary hospital in North Tanzania: a retrospective cohort study (2000-2015).坦桑尼亚北部一家三级医院行引产孕妇行剖宫产的流行率和危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究(2000-2015 年)。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Mar 18;20(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-02861-8.
5
The predictive value of cervical shear wave elastography in the outcome of labor induction.经阴道超声宫颈剪切波弹性成像预测引产结局的价值。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jan;99(1):59-68. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13706. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
6
Mechanical methods for induction of labour.引产的机械方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 18;10(10):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub3.
7
Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement in predicting failed labor induction and cesarean delivery for failure to progress in nulliparous women.经阴道超声测量宫颈情况对预测初产妇引产失败及因产程无进展行剖宫产的价值
J Korean Med Sci. 2007 Aug;22(4):722-7. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2007.22.4.722.