Suppr超能文献

尿试纸条与微量白蛋白尿定量方法的比较。

Comparison of urine dipsticks with quantitative methods for microalbuminuria.

作者信息

Pugia M J, Lott J A, Clark L W, Parker D R, Wallace J F, Willis T W

机构信息

Diagnostics Business Group, Bayer Corporation, Elkhart, IN, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1997 Sep;35(9):693-700.

PMID:9352232
Abstract

We describe a new dip- and read dipstick that detects urine albumin at concentrations of 10 mg/l and above and urine creatinine at concentrations of 300 mg/l and above. The albumin assay is based on a high-affinity, dye-binding technique while the creatinine assay is based on the peroxidase-like activity of copper creatinine complexes. With these two-test dipsticks, urines from normal adults supplemented with albumin and creatinine were correctly identified to within +/- 15% of the expected value for both analytes; the between-day coefficients of variation ranged from 7.1% to 16.1%. We tested 275 patients' unmodified urines by the Bayer and Boehringer Mannheim Micral-Test albumin dipsticks and for albumin with the Beckman Array on the same specimens. We also analyzed 42 selected urines from the group of 275 for albumin by another quantitative immunochemical method and by electrophoresis plus a total protein method to estimate the albumin concentration. The quantitative immunochemical methods appear to underestimate the urine albumin concentrations; in these 42 urines measured as negative, i.e., < ca. 16-20 mg/l, by one of the quantitative method but positive by the Bayer dipstick, 33 of these were positive by the electrophoresis/total protein assay combination. The Bayer albumin dipstick correctly identified urines as having < 16 mg/l or > or = 16 mg/l at an 80% rate. At a cutoff of 20 mg/l, the rate increased to 87%. We also determined the urinary albumin/creatinine ratios on the 275 patients using the Bayer two-pad dipstick and found agreement 84% of the time with the same ratio obtained from a quantitative immunochemical method for albumin and a rate-Jaffe method for creatinine; an albumin/creatinine ratio (mg/g) of 30 was used as the discrimination point. Albumin stability studies performed on the Beckman Array patients with six fresh urines showed small but consistent decreases at -20 degrees C but not at 4 degrees C after one month of storage. The albumin in contrived urines, as estimated by electrophoreses/total protein and by the dipsticks did not change at these storage conditions. Boric acid at 1 g/l as a urine preservative had no effect on the measurement of albumin by any of the methods described here nor of the assay of creatinine. Other urinary proteins present at abnormal excretion rates did not interfere with the Bayer albumin dipstick. Abnormal concentrations of bilirubin, citrate, creatine, ascorbic acid, albumin, hemoglobin and myoglobin in urine did not interfere with the creatinine dipstick measurements. The first four of the above did not affect the Bayer dipstick results for albumin.

摘要

我们描述了一种新型的即浸即读试纸条,它能检测浓度在10mg/L及以上的尿白蛋白和浓度在300mg/L及以上的尿肌酐。白蛋白检测基于高亲和力的染料结合技术,而肌酐检测基于铜肌酐复合物的过氧化物酶样活性。使用这种双检测试纸条,对补充了白蛋白和肌酐的正常成年人尿液中两种分析物的检测结果与预期值的偏差在±15%以内;日间变异系数范围为7.1%至16.1%。我们用拜耳和勃林格殷格翰的Micral-Test白蛋白试纸条检测了275例患者的未处理尿液,并对相同样本用贝克曼Array检测白蛋白。我们还通过另一种定量免疫化学方法以及电泳加总蛋白法对275例患者中选取的42份尿液进行白蛋白分析,以估算白蛋白浓度。定量免疫化学方法似乎低估了尿白蛋白浓度;在这42份用一种定量方法检测为阴性(即<约16 - 20mg/L)但用拜耳试纸条检测为阳性的尿液中,其中33份经电泳/总蛋白检测组合为阳性。拜耳白蛋白试纸条以80%的准确率正确识别尿液白蛋白含量<16mg/L或≥16mg/L。当临界值设定为20mg/L时,准确率提高到87%。我们还用拜耳双垫试纸条测定了275例患者的尿白蛋白/肌酐比值,发现84%的情况下与用定量免疫化学方法检测白蛋白和速率法检测肌酐得到的相同比值一致;以白蛋白/肌酐比值(mg/g)30作为判别点。对贝克曼Array检测的患者的6份新鲜尿液进行白蛋白稳定性研究,结果显示在 - 20℃储存1个月后白蛋白有小幅但持续的下降,而在4℃时无变化。通过电泳/总蛋白法和试纸条估算的人工合成尿液中的白蛋白在这些储存条件下没有变化。1g/L硼酸作为尿液防腐剂对本文所述的任何白蛋白检测方法以及肌酐检测均无影响。排泄率异常的其他尿蛋白不干扰拜耳白蛋白试纸条检测。尿液中胆红素、柠檬酸盐、肌酸、抗坏血酸、白蛋白、血红蛋白和肌红蛋白的异常浓度不干扰肌酐试纸条检测。上述前四种物质不影响拜耳试纸条检测白蛋白的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验