• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项比较腹部子宫切除术中持续膀胱引流与导尿术的前瞻性随机试验。

A prospective, randomized trial comparing continuous bladder drainage with catheterization at abdominal hysterectomy.

作者信息

Dobbs S P, Jackson S R, Wilson A M, Maplethorpe R P, Hammond R H

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Br J Urol. 1997 Oct;80(4):554-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.t01-1-00376.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.t01-1-00376.x
PMID:9352691
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the infection rate and post-operative morbidity between in-dwelling urinary catheterization and 'in-out' catheterization at the time of routine total abdominal hysterectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study comprised 100 patients who were blindly randomized to have either an indwelling Foley catheter or an 'in-out' catheterization at the time of surgery. Follow-up data on the retention of urine, urinary symptoms and infection were obtained.

RESULTS

Of the 95 patients with complete data, 36% of those undergoing in-out catheterization had urinary retention after operation, requiring bladder emptying, compared with 4% of those receiving an indwelling catheter (P < 0.001). In addition, 29% of the catheterized group had urinary tract bacteriuria compared with 13% of the uncatheterized group (P < 0.025).

CONCLUSION

This randomized controlled trial showed that in-out urinary catheterization at the time of routine abdominal hysterectomy was associated with a significantly higher incidence of post-operative urinary retention compared with in-dwelling catheterization, and may have implications for long-term bladder function.

摘要

目的

比较常规全腹子宫切除术时留置导尿与间歇性导尿的感染率及术后发病率。

患者与方法

本研究纳入100例患者,在手术时将其随机分为两组,分别接受留置Foley导尿管或间歇性导尿。收集了关于尿潴留、泌尿系统症状及感染的随访数据。

结果

在95例有完整数据的患者中,间歇性导尿组术后有36%发生尿潴留,需要膀胱排空,而留置导尿管组这一比例为4%(P<0.001)。此外,导尿组有29%发生泌尿系统菌尿,未导尿组为13%(P<0.025)。

结论

这项随机对照试验表明,常规腹式子宫切除术时间歇性导尿与留置导尿相比,术后尿潴留的发生率显著更高,且可能对长期膀胱功能有影响。

相似文献

1
A prospective, randomized trial comparing continuous bladder drainage with catheterization at abdominal hysterectomy.一项比较腹部子宫切除术中持续膀胱引流与导尿术的前瞻性随机试验。
Br J Urol. 1997 Oct;80(4):554-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1997.t01-1-00376.x.
2
Bacteriuria and urinary retention following gynaecological surgery: comparing short vs long term catheterization.妇科手术后的菌尿症和尿潴留:短期与长期导尿的比较
J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2010 Oct;8(2):107-9.
3
[Bacteriuria and Symptomatic Urinary Tract Infections during Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Patients with Short-Term Urinary Catheters - Prospective Randomised Study in Patients after Joint Replacement Surgery].[短期留置导尿管患者抗菌药物预防期间的菌尿症和有症状的尿路感染——关节置换术后患者的前瞻性随机研究]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2017;84(5):368-371.
4
Types of urethral catheters for management of short-term voiding problems in hospitalized adults: a short version Cochrane review.用于管理住院成年患者短期排尿问题的尿道导管类型:Cochrane系统评价短版
Neurourol Urodyn. 2008;27(8):738-46. doi: 10.1002/nau.20645.
5
Prospective comparison of indwelling bladder catheter drainage versus no catheter after vaginal hysterectomy.阴道子宫切除术后留置膀胱导管引流与不置管的前瞻性比较。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Jun;170(6):1815-8; discussion 1818-21. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70358-2.
6
A prospective randomized trial to compare immediate and 24-hour delayed catheter removal following total abdominal hysterectomy.一项前瞻性随机试验,旨在比较全子宫切除术后即刻和 24 小时延迟拔除导尿管的效果。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011 May;90(5):478-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01104.x. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
7
Timing of urinary catheter removal after uncomplicated total abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective randomized trial.单纯性全腹子宫切除术后导尿管拔除时机:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 May;176:60-3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.02.038. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
8
Evaluating the effectiveness of early urethral catheter removal combined with intermittent catheterization for promoting early recovery of bladder function after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.评价早期尿道导管移除联合间歇性导尿对促进腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术后膀胱功能早期恢复的效果:一项随机对照试验研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Jun 28;25(1):422. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08266-8.
9
The incidence of urinary tract infection of different routes of catheterization following gynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.妇科手术后不同导尿途径尿路感染的发生率:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Apr;30(4):523-535. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3791-3. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
10
Catheter-associated bacteriuria in patients in reverse isolation.接受反向隔离患者的导管相关菌尿症
J Urol. 1982 Oct;128(4):752-4. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)53170-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute Delirium Post-inguinal Hernia Mesh Repair in a 40-Year-Old Male: An Unusual Case of Cystocerebral Syndrome.一名40岁男性腹股沟疝修补术后急性谵妄:一例罕见的膀胱脑综合征病例
Cureus. 2023 Jul 21;15(7):e42260. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42260. eCollection 2023 Jul.
2
Effect of urinary catheter removal on different time after hysterectomy: a network meta-analysis.**标题**:**网络荟萃分析:子宫切除术后不同时间拔除导尿管对患者的影响**。 **摘要**:背景:导尿管一般在子宫切除术后 1-5 天内拔除,但是关于术后何时拔除导尿管的最佳时间尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较子宫切除术后不同时间拔除导尿管对患者的影响。 **方法**:我们检索了 Cochrane 图书馆、PubMed、EMBASE、Web of Science、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网和万方数据库,收集了比较子宫切除术后不同时间拔除导尿管对患者影响的随机对照试验。使用 R 软件中的`gemtc`包进行网络荟萃分析。 **结果**:我们共纳入 22 项随机对照试验,包括 1827 名患者。分析结果表明,术后 1-2 天拔除导尿管与术后 2-3 天拔除导尿管相比,在首次排尿时间、残余尿量、导尿管相关尿路感染、尿潴留和膀胱痉挛方面无显著差异。术后 1-2 天与术后 3-4 天或术后 4-5 天相比,在首次排尿时间、残余尿量、导尿管相关尿路感染、尿潴留和膀胱痉挛方面也无显著差异。但是术后 1-2 天与术后 4-5 天相比,膀胱痉挛的发生率更高。 **结论**:基于现有证据,术后 1-2 天或 2-3 天拔除导尿管对患者的影响无显著差异。
Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Sep;33(9):2367-2378. doi: 10.1007/s00192-021-05067-4. Epub 2022 Jan 3.
3
The incidence of urinary tract infection of different routes of catheterization following gynecologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.妇科手术后不同导尿途径尿路感染的发生率:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Apr;30(4):523-535. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3791-3. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
4
Urethral (indwelling or intermittent) or suprapubic routes for short-term catheterisation in hospitalised adults.住院成人短期导尿的尿道(留置或间歇性)或耻骨上途径。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 10;2015(12):CD004203. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004203.pub3.
5
A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing immediate and delayed catheter removal following uncomplicated hysterectomy.一项比较单纯子宫切除术后立即拔除导管与延迟拔除导管的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Urogynecol J. 2015 May;26(5):665-74. doi: 10.1007/s00192-014-2561-0. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
6
Teaching patients clean intermittent self-catheterisation prior to anti-incontinence or prolapse surgery: is it necessary in women with obstructive voiding dysfunction?在进行抗失禁或脱垂手术前向患者教授清洁间歇性自我导尿:对于有阻塞性排尿功能障碍的女性是否有必要?
Int Urol Nephrol. 2012 Jun;44(3):739-43. doi: 10.1007/s11255-011-0072-1. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
7
Symptomatic urinary tract infections after surgery for prolapse and/or incontinence.子宫脱垂和/或尿失禁手术后的症状性尿路感染。
Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Aug;21(8):955-61. doi: 10.1007/s00192-010-1137-x. Epub 2010 Mar 31.
8
Prophylactic antibiotics to prevent urinary tract infection during clean intermittent self-catheterization (CISC) for management of voiding dysfunction after prolapse and incontinence surgery: a decision analysis.预防性使用抗生素以预防子宫脱垂和尿失禁手术后排尿功能障碍患者在清洁间歇性自我导尿(CISC)期间发生尿路感染:一项决策分析。
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Aug;20(8):933-8. doi: 10.1007/s00192-009-0885-y. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
9
The association between regional anesthesia and acute postoperative urinary retention in women undergoing outpatient midurethral sling procedures.门诊经尿道中段吊带手术女性患者区域麻醉与术后急性尿潴留之间的关联。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May;200(5):571.e1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.11.021. Epub 2009 Feb 14.
10
Postoperative urinary outcomes in catheterized and non-catheterized patients undergoing laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy--a randomized controlled trial.接受腹腔镜辅助阴式子宫切除术的留置导尿管与未留置导尿管患者的术后排尿结果——一项随机对照试验
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009 Mar;20(3):295-300. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0769-6. Epub 2008 Nov 14.