• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Pain and the choice to hasten death in patients with painful metastatic cancer.

作者信息

Sullivan M, Rapp S, Fitzgibbon D, Chapman C R

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

出版信息

J Palliat Care. 1997 Autumn;13(3):18-28.

PMID:9354037
Abstract

Unrelieved pain has been cited as an important reason why cancer patients may seek to hasten their deaths. We interviewed 48 patients with painful metastatic cancer to ascertain their interest in various active and passive modes of hastening death. Ninety percent of these patients supported the general right of terminally ill patients to passive modes of hastening death and 80% supported the right to active modes such as assisted suicide and euthanasia. If they developed severe pain that could not be relieved, 80% would instruct their physician write a "do not attempt resuscitation" order, 40%-50% would want to receive suicide information or a lethal prescription from their physician, and 34% would request a lethal injection from their physician. Current pain and depression levels were not associated with interest in hastening death, but current somatic symptom burden was significantly associated with this interest.

摘要

相似文献

1
Pain and the choice to hasten death in patients with painful metastatic cancer.
J Palliat Care. 1997 Autumn;13(3):18-28.
2
Physician-assisted suicide: are we asking the right questions?医生协助自杀:我们问对问题了吗?
Second Opin. 1992 Oct;18(2):95-8.
3
Is the pendulum of public opinion swinging in favour of euthanasia?舆论的钟摆是否正摆向支持安乐死的方向?
CMAJ. 1995 Mar 15;152(6):956-8.
4
Where docs draw the line.医生的底线在哪里。 (注:原句“docs”拼写有误,正确应为“doctors”;“Where docs draw the line”语法有误,正确表述可能是“Where do doctors draw the line” ) 经修正后准确译文为:医生们在哪里划定界限。 但按你要求不添加解释,就按原错误句子翻译如上)
Hastings Cent Rep. 1993 Sep-Oct;23(5):3-4.
5
Active vs. passive euthanasia: why keep the distinction?主动安乐死与被动安乐死:为何要区分?
Trial. 1993 Mar;29(3):32-34, 36-38.
6
Medical concerns about physician-assisted suicide.对医生协助自杀的医学担忧。
Seattle Univ Law Rev. 1995 Spring;18(3):521-30.
7
The euthanasia war: last rights -- human beings do not start their own life; do they have the right to invite a doctor to end it? The pros and cons of doctor-assisted suicide.安乐死之争:临终权利——人类不能自行开启生命,那么他们有权邀请医生终结生命吗?医生协助自杀的利弊。
Economist. 1997 Jun 21;343(8022):21-4.
8
A death of one's own.自主死亡
New Yorker. 1995 May 22;71(13):54-60, 62-69.
9
Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: attitudes and experiences of oncology patients, oncologists, and the public.安乐死与医生协助自杀:肿瘤患者、肿瘤学家及公众的态度与经历
Lancet. 1996 Jun 29;347(9018):1805-10. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91621-9.
10
A right to die? Some medico-legal reflection.死亡权?一些法医学思考。
Med Leg J. 1994;62(Pt. 4):165-79.

引用本文的文献

1
[Opportunities and risks of advance directives : An appraisal of the practice in Germany after legal regulation in 2009].[预立医疗指示的机遇与风险:对2009年法律规制后德国实践情况的评估]
Schmerz. 2025 Apr;39(2):133-140. doi: 10.1007/s00482-023-00771-0. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
2
A cross-sectional study on associations of physical symptoms, health self-efficacy, and suicidal ideation among Chinese hospitalized cancer patients.一项横断面研究,探讨中国住院癌症患者身体症状、健康自我效能感和自杀意念之间的关系。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Nov 19;20(1):544. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02945-x.
3
Comparison of attitudes towards five end-of-life care interventions (active pain control, withdrawal of futile life-sustaining treatment, passive euthanasia, active euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide): a multicentred cross-sectional survey of Korean patients with cancer, their family caregivers, physicians and the general Korean population.
对五种临终关怀干预措施(积极控制疼痛、撤销无效的维持生命治疗、被动安乐死、主动安乐死和医生协助自杀)的态度比较:对韩国癌症患者、其家庭护理人员、医生及韩国普通民众的多中心横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2018 Sep 11;8(9):e020519. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020519.
4
[Limits of pain treatment: medical and judicial aspects].[疼痛治疗的局限:医学与司法层面]
Schmerz. 2011 Aug;25(4):377-80, 382-92. doi: 10.1007/s00482-011-1073-9.
5
Attitudes of cancer patients, family caregivers, oncologists and members of the general public toward critical interventions at the end of life of terminally ill patients.癌症患者、家庭护理人员、肿瘤学家和普通公众对绝症患者生命末期关键干预措施的态度。
CMAJ. 2011 Jul 12;183(10):E673-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.110020. Epub 2011 May 30.
6
Assessment of consent capability in psychiatric and medical studies.精神病学和医学研究中同意能力的评估。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2011 Mar;6(1):39-50. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.1.39.
7
IRB Member Judgments of Decisional Capacity, Coercion, and Risk in Medical and Psychiatric Studies.机构审查委员会成员对医学和精神病学研究中决策能力、胁迫及风险的判断
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2008 Mar;3(1):15-24. doi: 10.1525/jer.2008.3.1.15.
8
Patients' voices are needed in debates on euthanasia.在关于安乐死的辩论中需要听到患者的声音。
BMJ. 2003 Jul 26;327(7408):213-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7408.213.
9
The undertreatment of pain: scientific, clinical, cultural, and philosophical factors.疼痛治疗不足:科学、临床、文化和哲学因素。
Med Health Care Philos. 2001;4(3):277-88. doi: 10.1023/a:1012057403159.