Emanuel E J, Fairclough D L, Daniels E R, Clarridge B R
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Control, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Lancet. 1996 Jun 29;347(9018):1805-10. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)91621-9.
Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are pressing public issues. We aimed to collect empirical data on these controversial interventions, particularly on the attitudes and experiences of oncology patients.
We interviewed, by telephone with vignette-style questions, 155 oncology patients, 355 oncologists, and 193 members of the public to assess their attitudes and experiences in relation to euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide.
About two thirds of oncology patients and the public found euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide acceptable for patients with unremitting pain. Oncology patients and the public found euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide least acceptable in vignettes involving "burden on the family" and "life viewed as meaningless". In no vignette--even for patients with unremitting pain--did a majority of oncologists find euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide ethically acceptable. Patients actually experiencing pain were more likely to find euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide unacceptable. More than a quarter of oncology patients had seriously thought about euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide and nearly 12 percent had seriously discussed these interventions with physicians or others. Patients with depression and psychological distress were significantly more likely to have seriously discussed euthanasia, hoarded drugs, or read Final Exit. More than half of oncologists had received requests for euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide. Nearly one in seven oncologists had carried out euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide.
Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide are important issues in the care of terminally ill patients and while oncology patients experiencing pain are unlikely to desire these interventions patients with depression are more likely to request assistance in committing suicide. Patients who request such an intervention should be evaluated and, where appropriate, treated for depression before euthanasia can be discussed seriously.
安乐死和医生协助自杀是紧迫的公共问题。我们旨在收集有关这些有争议干预措施的实证数据,尤其是关于肿瘤患者的态度和经历。
我们通过电话以 vignette 式问题采访了155名肿瘤患者、355名肿瘤学家和193名公众,以评估他们对安乐死和医生协助自杀的态度和经历。
约三分之二的肿瘤患者和公众认为,对于患有持续性疼痛的患者,安乐死和医生协助自杀是可以接受的。在涉及“给家庭带来负担”和“生命被视为无意义”的 vignette 中,肿瘤患者和公众认为安乐死和医生协助自杀最不可接受。在任何 vignette 中,即使是对于患有持续性疼痛的患者,大多数肿瘤学家也不认为安乐死或医生协助自杀在伦理上是可接受的。实际经历疼痛的患者更有可能认为安乐死或医生协助自杀不可接受。超过四分之一的肿瘤患者曾认真考虑过安乐死或医生协助自杀,近12%的患者曾与医生或其他人认真讨论过这些干预措施。患有抑郁症和心理困扰的患者明显更有可能认真讨论过安乐死、囤积药物或阅读过《最后的出口》。超过一半的肿瘤学家收到过安乐死或医生协助自杀的请求。近七分之一的肿瘤学家实施过安乐死或医生协助自杀。
安乐死和医生协助自杀是晚期患者护理中的重要问题,虽然经历疼痛的肿瘤患者不太可能渴望这些干预措施,但患有抑郁症的患者更有可能请求自杀协助。在认真讨论安乐死之前,应对请求此类干预措施的患者进行评估,并在适当情况下治疗其抑郁症。