Stone H D
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Center, Athens, GA, USA.
Avian Dis. 1997 Jul-Sep;41(3):591-7.
Animal, vegetable, and synthetic oils were tested as potential replacements for mineral oil in Newcastle disease oil emulsion vaccines. Emulsifying surfactants of seed oil origin comprised 10% of the the oil phase that was used to prepare water-in-oil emulsion vaccines that contained a final concentration of 20% aqueous antigen. The hemagglutination inhibition responses of chickens inoculated with 46 of the newly formulated oil vaccines were, in most cases, not significantly different from those of control chickens inoculated with mineral oil vaccine. Tissue reactions associated with animal, vegetable, and synthetic oil vaccines were less severe than those associated with mineral oil vaccines. Viscosity of the mineral oil formulations ranged from 1/2 to 3 1/2 times that of the mineral oil control vaccines. These findings indicate that any of several oils may be more suitable than mineral oil for preparation of immune adjuvants for poultry vaccines.
对动物油、植物油和合成油作为新城疫油乳剂疫苗中矿物油的潜在替代品进行了测试。源自种子油的乳化表面活性剂占用于制备油包水乳剂疫苗的油相的10%,该疫苗含有终浓度为20%的水性抗原。在大多数情况下,接种46种新配制油疫苗的鸡的血凝抑制反应与接种矿物油疫苗的对照鸡的反应无显著差异。与动物油、植物油和合成油疫苗相关的组织反应比与矿物油疫苗相关的反应轻。矿物油制剂的粘度为矿物油对照疫苗的粘度的1/2至3 1/2倍。这些发现表明,几种油中的任何一种可能比矿物油更适合用于制备家禽疫苗的免疫佐剂。