• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evaluating the terminology requirements to support multi-disciplinary diabetes care.评估支持多学科糖尿病护理的术语要求。
Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1997:645-9.
2
Use of Read codes in diabetes management in a south London primary care group: implications for establishing disease registers.伦敦南部初级保健组中Read编码在糖尿病管理中的应用:对建立疾病登记册的启示
BMJ. 2003 May 24;326(7399):1130. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7399.1130.
3
Modeling a description logic vocabulary for cancer research.为癌症研究构建描述逻辑词汇表。
J Biomed Inform. 2005 Apr;38(2):114-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2004.09.001.
4
Description of a drug hierarchy in a concept-based reference terminology.基于概念的参考术语中药物层级的描述。
Proc AMIA Symp. 2001:314-8.
5
Clinical administration procedures in the Read Thesaurus: extending the ENV 1828 model to support regional terminology requirements.《医学主题词表》中的临床管理程序:扩展ENV 1828模型以支持区域术语需求。
Proc AMIA Symp. 1998:840-4.
6
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
7
Coming to terms with datasets for diabetes care.应对糖尿病护理数据集
Diabetes Nutr Metab. 2000 Aug;13(4):215-9.
8
A detailed examination of the clinical terms and concepts required for communication by electronic messages in diabetes care.
Diabetes Nutr Metab. 2000 Aug;13(4):201-9.
9
Issues in designing a controlled vocabulary and a patient data representation model for a hospital-wide EPR system.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2000;77:637-41.
10
Clinical terminology support for a national ambulatory practice outcomes research network.对国家门诊实践结果研究网络的临床术语支持。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:629-33.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital health technologies and innovation patterns in diabetes ecosystems.糖尿病生态系统中的数字健康技术与创新模式。
Digit Health. 2025 Feb 5;11:20552076241311740. doi: 10.1177/20552076241311740. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Evaluation of controlled vocabulary resources for development of a consumer entry vocabulary for diabetes.用于开发糖尿病患者录入词汇表的受控词汇资源评估
J Med Internet Res. 2001 Jul-Sep;3(3):E24. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3.3.e24.
3
Evaluation of the quality of information retrieval of clinical findings from a computerized patient database using a semantic terminological model.使用语义术语模型评估来自计算机化患者数据库的临床发现信息检索质量。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000 Jul-Aug;7(4):392-403. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2000.0070392.
4
A template-based approach to support utilization of clinical practice guidelines within an electronic health record.一种基于模板的方法,以支持在电子健康记录中利用临床实践指南。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1998 May-Jun;5(3):237-44. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1998.0050237.

本文引用的文献

1
Read Codes Version 3: a user led terminology.《阅读编码第3版》:一种用户主导的术语体系。
Methods Inf Med. 1995 Mar;34(1-2):187-92.
2
Monitoring the targets of the St Vincent Declaration and the implementation of quality management in diabetes care: the DIABCARE initiative. The DIABCARE Monitoring Group of the St Vincent Declaration Steering Committee.监测《圣文森特宣言》目标及糖尿病护理质量管理的实施情况:DIABCARE倡议。圣文森特宣言指导委员会DIABCARE监测小组。
Diabet Med. 1993 May;10(4):371-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1993.tb00083.x.
3
The Unified Medical Language System.统一医学语言系统
Methods Inf Med. 1993 Aug;32(4):281-91. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1634945.
4
Mortality trends and causes of death in diabetic patients.
Diabete Metab. 1993;19(1 Pt 2):96-9.
5
Perceived strategic and practical problems in the use of information technology for quality improvement in diabetes care in the United Kingdom.
Diabete Metab. 1993;19(1 Pt 2):80-8.
6
The feedback between monitoring and improvement of quality of diabetes care.糖尿病护理质量监测与改进之间的反馈。
Diabete Metab. 1993;19(1 Pt 2):70-3.
7
Electronic health records: the European scene.电子健康记录:欧洲的情况
BMJ. 1994 Nov 19;309(6965):1358-61. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6965.1358.
8
The UK Diabetes Dataset: a standard for information exchange. Diabetes Audit Working Group of the Research Unit of the Royal College of Physicians. British Diabetic Association.
Diabet Med. 1995 Aug;12(8):717-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1995.tb00576.x.
9
The cost of diabetes.
Diabet Med. 1989 Mar;6(2):164-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.1989.tb02107.x.

评估支持多学科糖尿病护理的术语要求。

Evaluating the terminology requirements to support multi-disciplinary diabetes care.

作者信息

Brown P J, Price C, Sonksen P H

机构信息

National Health Service Centre for Coding and Classification, Loughborough, UK.

出版信息

Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1997:645-9.

PMID:9357705
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2233396/
Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is a multi-system disease requiring lifetime multi-disciplinary care, which has proven individual and economic benefits. The delivery of service involves co-operation and communication between patient, carer and health care professionals, and systematic auditing of processes and outcomes. Sustained improvement necessitates regular data acquisition, aggregation and analysis. The terminology requirements to support patient-centred records and identified datasets are examined, and differences in purpose and scope highlighted. The many stakeholders involved in diabetes care have their own sublanguages and terminology requirements which need harmonising around a common core. The problems and solutions of accommodating these needs are explored in relation to the Read Thesaurus.

摘要

糖尿病是一种需要终身多学科护理的多系统疾病,已证明具有个体和经济效益。服务的提供涉及患者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员之间的合作与沟通,以及对过程和结果的系统审核。持续改进需要定期进行数据采集、汇总和分析。本文研究了支持以患者为中心的记录和已识别数据集的术语要求,并突出了目的和范围的差异。参与糖尿病护理的众多利益相关者有各自的子语言和术语要求,需要围绕一个共同核心进行协调。本文结合《Read 词库》探讨了满足这些需求的问题及解决方案。