Suppr超能文献

气体输送设备引发的不良麻醉后果:一项结案索赔分析。

Adverse anesthetic outcomes arising from gas delivery equipment: a closed claims analysis.

作者信息

Caplan R A, Vistica M F, Posner K L, Cheney F W

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University of Washington School of Medicine and the Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle 98111-0900, USA.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 1997 Oct;87(4):741-8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199710000-00006.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Anesthesia gas delivery equipment is a potentially important source of patient injury. To better define the contribution of gas delivery equipment to professional liability in anesthesia, the authors conducted an in-depth analysis of cases from the database of the American Society of Anesthesiologists Closed Claims Project.

METHODS

The database of the Closed Claims Project is composed of closed US malpractice claims that have been collected in a standardized manner. All claims resulting from the use of gas delivery equipment were reviewed for recurrent patterns of injury.

RESULTS

Gas delivery equipment was associated with 72 (2%) of 3,791 claims in the database. Death and permanent brain damage accounted for almost all adverse outcomes (n = 55, 76%). Equipment misuse was defined as fault or human error associated with the preparation, maintenance, or deployment of a medical device. Equipment failure was defined as unexpected malfunction of a medical device, despite routine maintenance and previous uneventful use. Misuse of equipment (n = 54, 75%) was three times more common than equipment failure (n = 17, 24%). Misconnects and disconnects of the breathing circuit made the largest contribution to injury (n = 25, 35%). Reviewers judged that 38 of 72 claims (53%) could have been prevented by pulse oximetry, capnography, or a combination of these two monitors. Overall, 56 of 72 gas delivery claims (78%) were deemed preventable with the use or better use of monitors. The year of occurrence for claims involving gas delivery equipment ranged from 1962 to 1991 and did not differ significantly from claims involving other adverse respiratory events.

CONCLUSIONS

Claims associated with gas delivery equipment are infrequent but severe and continue to occur in the 1990s. Educational and preventive strategies that focus on equipment misuse and breathing circuit configuration may have the greatest potential for enhancing the safety of anesthesia gas delivery equipment.

摘要

背景

麻醉气体输送设备是患者受伤的一个潜在重要来源。为了更好地界定气体输送设备在麻醉专业责任中的作用,作者对美国麻醉医师协会封闭索赔项目数据库中的病例进行了深入分析。

方法

封闭索赔项目数据库由以标准化方式收集的美国医疗事故结案索赔组成。对所有因使用气体输送设备导致的索赔进行审查,以找出反复出现的损伤模式。

结果

数据库中的3791起索赔中有72起(2%)与气体输送设备有关。死亡和永久性脑损伤几乎占了所有不良后果(n = 55,76%)。设备误用被定义为与医疗设备的准备、维护或使用相关的失误或人为错误。设备故障被定义为医疗设备意外出现故障,尽管进行了常规维护且之前使用正常。设备误用(n = 54,75%)比设备故障(n = 17,24%)常见三倍。呼吸回路的误连接和断开对损伤的影响最大(n = 25,35%)。审查人员判断,如果使用脉搏血氧饱和度仪、二氧化碳监测仪或这两种监测仪联合使用,72起索赔中的38起(53%)本可避免。总体而言,72起气体输送索赔中有56起(78%)被认为通过使用或更好地使用监测仪可预防。涉及气体输送设备的索赔发生年份从1962年至1991年,与涉及其他不良呼吸事件的索赔无显著差异。

结论

与气体输送设备相关的索赔虽不常见但后果严重,且在20世纪90年代仍有发生。关注设备误用和呼吸回路配置的教育及预防策略可能对提高麻醉气体输送设备的安全性具有最大潜力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验