Evaluation of a malaria antibody ELISA and its value in reducing potential wastage of red cell donations from blood donors exposed to malaria, with a note on a case of transfusion-transmitted malaria.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Blood donations are often wasted for lack of a satisfactory procedure to evaluate donors potentially exposed to malaria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We evaluated a commercial ELISA for the detection of antibodies to malaria and compared it with an immunofluorescent antibody test (IFAT).

RESULTS

When 5,311 sera from routine non-exposed donors were tested, 24 (0.45%) were positive by the ELISA, using a Plasmodium falciparum antigen. Seventeen were subjected to confirmatory testing but none were positive by IFAT. Of 1,000 donors potentially exposed in endemic areas 15 (1.5%) were repeatably reactive by ELISA. 10 of these were tested by IFAT and 2 were positive. When 150 patients attending the Hospital for Tropical Diseases in London with acute malaria were tested, 73% of those infected with P. falciparum were repeatably reactive for malarial antibodies by ELISA and 56% with Plasmodium vivax. Of 88 stored clinical sera tested by both IFAT and ELISA 56 were positive by IFAT and of these 52 (93 degrees/0) were positive by ELISA.

CONCLUSION

The ELISA is sufficiently sensitive and specific to screen at-risk donors. Its use could safely retrieve 40,000 red cell units currently discarded each year in Great Britain.