Department of Translational Science, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy.
Malar J. 2019 Jan 22;18(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12936-019-2650-0.
Transfusion with Plasmodium-infected blood represents a risk for malaria transmission, a rare but severe event. Several non-endemic countries implement a strategy for the screening of candidate blood donors including questionnaire for the identification of at-risk subjects and laboratory testing of blood samples, often serology-based, with temporary deferral from donation for individuals with a positive result. In Italy, the most recent legislation, issued in November 2015, introduced the use of serological tests for the detection of anti-Plasmodium antibodies.
In the absence of a gold standard for malaria serology, the aim of this work was to evaluate five commercial ELISA kits, and to determine their accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) in comparison to immuno-fluorescence antibody test (IFAT), and their agreement (concordance of results). Serum samples from malaria patients or from subjects with malaria history (N = 64), malaria naïve patients with other parasitic infections (N = 15), malaria naïve blood donors (N = 8) and malaria exposed candidate blood donors (N = 36) were tested.
The specificity of all ELISA kits was 100%, while sensitivity ranged between 53 and 64% when compared to IFAT on malaria patients samples. When tested on candidate blood donors' samples, ELISA kits showed highly variable agreement (42-94%) raising the possibility that the same individual could be included or excluded from donation depending on the test in use by the transfusion centre.
These preliminary results indicate how the lack of a gold standard for malaria serology must be taken into account in the application and future revision of current legislation. There is need of developing more sensitive serological assays. Moreover, the adoption of a unique serological test at national level is recommended, as well as the development of screening algorithms based on multiple laboratory tests, including molecular assays.
输入感染疟原虫的血液会带来疟疾传播的风险,这是一种罕见但严重的事件。一些非疟疾流行国家实施了一种针对候选献血者的筛查策略,包括识别高危人群的问卷和血液样本的实验室检测,通常是基于血清学的,对于检测结果为阳性的个体,暂时推迟献血。在意大利,2015 年 11 月发布的最新法规引入了血清学检测以检测抗疟原虫抗体。
由于缺乏疟疾血清学的金标准,本研究旨在评估五种商业 ELISA 试剂盒,并比较免疫荧光抗体检测(IFA)来确定它们的准确性(灵敏度和特异性),以及它们的一致性(结果的一致性)。我们检测了疟疾患者或有疟疾病史的个体(N=64)、患有其他寄生虫感染的疟疾初治患者(N=15)、疟疾初治献血者(N=8)和疟疾暴露的候选献血者(N=36)的血清样本。
所有 ELISA 试剂盒的特异性均为 100%,而与 IFA 相比,针对疟疾患者样本的灵敏度在 53%至 64%之间。当对候选献血者的样本进行检测时,ELISA 试剂盒显示出高度可变的一致性(42-94%),这表明根据输血中心使用的检测方法,同一个人可能会被纳入或排除献血。
这些初步结果表明,在应用和未来修订现行法规时,必须考虑到缺乏疟疾血清学的金标准。需要开发更敏感的血清学检测方法。此外,建议在国家层面采用单一的血清学检测方法,并根据包括分子检测在内的多种实验室检测制定筛查算法。