• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Nisoldipine CC and lisinopril alone or in combination for treatment of mild to moderate systemic hypertension. Canadian Nisoldipine CC Hypertension Trial Group.

作者信息

Ruddy T D, Fodor J G

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Canada.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1997 Sep;11(4):581-90. doi: 10.1023/a:1007744005480.

DOI:10.1023/a:1007744005480
PMID:9358963
Abstract

The efficacy and safety of nisoldipine CC and lisinopril were compared in 278 patients with mild to moderate systemic hypertension in a double-blind, placebo run-in trial. Patients were randomized to nisoldipine CC or lisinopril for 8 weeks to achieve a trough sitting diastolic blood pressure (BP) < or = 90 mmHg. Responders were maintained on their optimal dose for a further 8 weeks. Nonresponders were switched to combination therapy and treated for 8 weeks. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) was carried out during placebo and monotherapy. The responder rate of 73.8% with nisoldipine CC after 8 weeks was greater than 56.1% with lisinopril (p = 0.007). The responder rate with combination therapy was 61%. ABPM showed that both nisoldipine CC and lisinopril produced constant blood pressure lowering effects over the 24-hour period and maintained circadian rhythm. Adverse effects were more frequent with nisoldipine CC (headache and peripheral edema) than with lisinopril (cough) monotherapy. Nisoldipine CC monotherapy was at least as effective as lisinopril monotherapy in the management of mild to moderate hypertension. Both agents were well tolerated. Combination therapy with nisoldipine CC and lisinopril was effective and well tolerated in patients with blood pressure not controlled by monotherapy alone.

摘要

相似文献

1
Nisoldipine CC and lisinopril alone or in combination for treatment of mild to moderate systemic hypertension. Canadian Nisoldipine CC Hypertension Trial Group.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1997 Sep;11(4):581-90. doi: 10.1023/a:1007744005480.
2
Efficacy and tolerability of nisoldipine coat-core formulation in the treatment of essential hypertension: The South African Multicenter ANCHOR Study. Ambulatory Nisoldipine Coat-Core Hypertension Outpatient Response (ANCHOR) Investigators.尼索地平包芯制剂治疗原发性高血压的疗效和耐受性:南非多中心ANCHOR研究。动态尼索地平包芯高血压门诊患者反应(ANCHOR)研究组。
Am J Hypertens. 1997 Mar;10(3):250-60. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(96)00384-6.
3
Antihypertensive monotherapy with nisoldipine CC is superior to enalapril in black patients with severe hypertension.对于重度高血压黑人患者,使用硝苯地平控释片进行抗高血压单药治疗优于依那普利。
Am J Hypertens. 1999 Feb;12(2 Pt 1):194-203. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(98)00233-7.
4
Additive effects of diltiazem and lisinopril in the treatment of elderly patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.
Am J Hypertens. 1997 Jul;10(7 Pt 1):743-9. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(96)00060-x.
5
Differences between nisoldipine and lisinopril on glomerular filtration rates and albuminuria in hypertensive IDDM patients with diabetic nephropathy during the first year of treatment.在治疗的第一年,尼索地平与赖诺普利对患有糖尿病肾病的高血压胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者肾小球滤过率和蛋白尿的影响差异。
Diabetes. 1997 Mar;46(3):481-7. doi: 10.2337/diab.46.3.481.
6
Comparative efficacy and safety of nisoldipine extended-release (ER) and amlodipine (CESNA-III study) in African American patients with hypertension.尼索地平缓释片与氨氯地平在非裔美国高血压患者中的疗效和安全性比较(CESNA-III研究)
Am J Hypertens. 2003 Sep;16(9 Pt 1):739-45. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(03)00946-4.
7
Effects of nisoldipine and lisinopril on left ventricular mass and function in diabetic nephropathy.尼索地平与赖诺普利对糖尿病肾病患者左心室质量及功能的影响。
Diabetes Care. 1999 Mar;22(3):491-4. doi: 10.2337/diacare.22.3.491.
8
Differential effects of morning and evening dosing of nisoldipine ER on circadian blood pressure and heart rate.尼索地平缓释片早晚给药对昼夜血压和心率的不同影响。
Am J Hypertens. 1999 Aug;12(8 Pt 1):806-14. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7061(99)00044-8.
9
Placebo effect and efficacy of nebivolol in patients with hypertension not controlled with lisinopril or losartan: a phase IV, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.安慰剂效应及比索洛尔在未被依那普利或氯沙坦控制的高血压患者中的疗效:一项 IV 期、随机、安慰剂对照试验。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2013 Apr;13(2):129-40. doi: 10.1007/s40256-013-0010-y.
10
An 18-week, prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study of amlodipine/ramipril combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension: the assessment of combination therapy of amlodipine/ramipril (ATAR) study.氨氯地平/雷米普利联合用药与氨氯地平单药治疗高血压的18周前瞻性随机双盲多中心研究:氨氯地平/雷米普利联合治疗评估(ATAR)研究
Clin Ther. 2008 Sep;30(9):1618-28. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.09.008.

引用本文的文献

1
A network meta-analysis comparative the efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and calcium channel blockers in hypertension.一项网络荟萃分析比较了血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和钙通道阻滞剂在高血压中的疗效。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jun 14;103(24):e37856. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037856.
2
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor induced cough compared with placebo, and other antihypertensives: A systematic review, and network meta-analysis.血管紧张素转化酶抑制剂引起的咳嗽与安慰剂和其他抗高血压药物的比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2023 Aug;25(8):661-688. doi: 10.1111/jch.14695. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
3
Nisoldipine coat-core. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy in hypertension.
尼索地平包衣片芯。其药理学及高血压治疗疗效综述。
Drugs. 1996 Aug;52(2):232-53. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199652020-00009.