• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会支持、互惠与幸福。

Social support, reciprocity, and well-being.

作者信息

Lu L

机构信息

Graduate Institute of Behavioural Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical College, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Soc Psychol. 1997 Oct;137(5):618-28. doi: 10.1080/00224549709595483.

DOI:10.1080/00224549709595483
PMID:9362145
Abstract

Systematic random-sampling procedures were used to gather a sample of 191 community residents in Kaohsiung city, Taiwan, and survey them regarding (a) amount of social support given and received; (b) perceived reciprocity of support in relationships with family members, friends, and colleagues; (c) negative affect; and (d) psychological symptoms. Extraversion and social desirability were also measured. Both receiving and giving support were related to negative affect after controlling for the effects of extraversion and social desirability. These two personality factors also substantially masked the negative impact of support on psychological symptoms. Reciprocity of support within the family domain was related to well-being. Individual differences in support exchanges were noted, and women received more support than men.

摘要

采用系统随机抽样程序,从中国台湾高雄市抽取了191名社区居民作为样本,并就以下方面对他们进行调查:(a) 给予和接受的社会支持数量;(b) 在与家庭成员、朋友和同事的关系中对支持互惠性的感知;(c) 消极情绪;以及(d) 心理症状。同时还测量了外向性和社会赞许性。在控制了外向性和社会赞许性的影响后,接受支持和给予支持都与消极情绪有关。这两个人格因素也在很大程度上掩盖了支持对心理症状的负面影响。家庭领域内的支持互惠性与幸福感有关。研究发现了支持交换中的个体差异,女性比男性获得更多支持。

相似文献

1
Social support, reciprocity, and well-being.社会支持、互惠与幸福。
J Soc Psychol. 1997 Oct;137(5):618-28. doi: 10.1080/00224549709595483.
2
Is reciprocity always beneficial? Age differences in the association between support balance and life satisfaction.互惠总是有益的吗?支持平衡与生活满意度之间关联的年龄差异。
Aging Ment Health. 2011 Jul 1;15(5):541-7. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2010.551340.
3
Benefits of negative social exchanges for emotional closeness.负面社交互动对情感亲密的益处。
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2009 Sep;64(5):612-21. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbp065. Epub 2009 Aug 12.
4
Relationships between perceived close social support and health practices within community samples of American women and men.美国社区样本中成年男女所感受到的亲密社会支持与健康行为之间的关系。
J Psychol. 2006 May;140(3):229-46. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.140.3.229-246.
5
Personal or environmental causes of happiness: a longitudinal analysis.幸福的个人或环境成因:一项纵向分析
J Soc Psychol. 1999 Feb;139(1):79-90. doi: 10.1080/00224549909598363.
6
When it is better to give than to receive: long-term health effects of perceived reciprocity in support exchange.施比受更有益:支持交换中感知到的互惠对长期健康的影响
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Aug;89(2):176-93. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.2.176.
7
Social exchanges and subjective well-being: do sources of positive and negative exchanges matter?社会交往与主观幸福感:积极和消极交往的来源是否重要?
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2011 Nov;66(6):708-18. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbr061. Epub 2011 Jul 9.
8
Divine relations, social relations, and well-being.神圣关系、社会关系与幸福安康。
J Health Soc Behav. 1989 Mar;30(1):92-104.
9
The role of social support and family relationships in women's responses to battering.
Health Care Women Int. 2000 Jan-Feb;21(1):27-39. doi: 10.1080/073993300245384.
10
Testing the emotion regulation hypothesis among self-injuring females: evidence for differences across mood states.在自我伤害的女性中检验情绪调节假说:不同情绪状态下差异的证据。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2007 Nov;195(11):912-8. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181593d89.

引用本文的文献

1
Experimental paradigm to test the effects of providing social support: study protocol of the PROSPECT trial (Study 2).测试提供社会支持效果的实验范式:PROSPECT试验(研究2)的研究方案
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jan 27;13(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s40359-024-02319-y.
2
A study on the determination of the factors affecting the happiness levels of older individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkish society.一项关于在土耳其社会新冠疫情期间影响老年人幸福水平因素的研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 23;20(1):e0316000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316000. eCollection 2025.
3
Personal Support Networks of Young People with Mild Intellectual Disabilities during the Transition to Adult Life.
年轻人轻度智力残疾向成人生活过渡时期的个人支持网络。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 11;18(22):11810. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211810.
4
Daily stressors facilitate giving and receiving of emotional support in adulthood.日常压力源有助于成年人给予和接受情感支持。
Stress Health. 2020 Aug;36(3):330-337. doi: 10.1002/smi.2927. Epub 2020 Feb 18.
5
Examining the nonkin support networks of orphaned adolescents participating in a family-based economic-strengthening intervention in Uganda.考察参与乌干达基于家庭的经济增强干预项目的孤儿青少年的非亲属支持网络。
J Community Psychol. 2019 Apr;47(3):579-593. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22139. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
6
The Association between Social Support and Happiness among Elderly in Iran.伊朗老年人社会支持与幸福感之间的关联。
Korean J Fam Med. 2018 Jul;39(4):260-265. doi: 10.4082/kjfm.17.0121. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
7
Caregiver social support quality when interacting with cancer survivors: advancing the dual-process model of supportive communication.照顾者与癌症幸存者互动时的社会支持质量:推进支持性沟通的双重过程模型。
Support Care Cancer. 2018 Apr;26(4):1281-1288. doi: 10.1007/s00520-017-3951-x. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
8
The psychological costs of social support imbalance: Variation across relationship context and age.社会支持失衡的心理代价:关系背景和年龄的变化。
J Health Psychol. 2019 Oct;24(12):1615-1625. doi: 10.1177/1359105317692854. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
9
Men, hearts and minds: developing and piloting culturally specific psychometric tools assessing psychosocial stress and depression in central Australian Aboriginal men.男性、心灵与思想:开发并试行针对澳大利亚中部原住民男性的、评估心理社会压力和抑郁的文化特定心理测量工具。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;51(2):211-23. doi: 10.1007/s00127-015-1100-8. Epub 2015 Aug 2.
10
The effects of extraversion, social support on the posttraumatic stress disorder and posttraumatic growth of adolescent survivors of the Wenchuan earthquake.外向性、社会支持对汶川地震青少年幸存者创伤后应激障碍及创伤后成长的影响
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 27;10(3):e0121480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121480. eCollection 2015.