Suppr超能文献

双膦酸盐在前列腺癌中的应用。

Bisphosphonates in prostate carcinoma.

作者信息

Adami S

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Ospedale di Valeggio, University of Verona, Italy.

出版信息

Cancer. 1997 Oct 15;80(8 Suppl):1674-9. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19971015)80:8+<1674::aid-cncr18>3.3.co;2-d.

Abstract

The majority of the patients with advanced prostate carcinoma have painful skeletal metastases, which are responsible for significant skeletal morbidity and disability. Most of these metastases are osteosclerotic, but it has been shown that the abnormal osteoblastic bone formation within metastases is preceded by osteoclastic activation, which appears to be associated with bone pain. This provides the rationale for using bisphosphonates, which are powerful and selective inhibitors of osteoclastic bone resorption. Several bisphosphonates have been shown to be clinically useful for the treatment of several conditions characterized by abnormal osteoclastic bone resorption, including Paget's disease, primary hyperparathyroidism, myelomatosis, and skeletal metastases. Its efficacy in relieving pain in patients with skeletal metastases due to prostate carcinoma has been confirmed in a few studies. The bisphosphonate clodronate was extensively investigated in the study unit. When infused intravenously i.v. (300 mg/day) relief of bone pain become appreciable within 3 days, sometimes preceded by a transient pain flare. These clinical results are very consistent and the residual pain usually is of extraosseous origin. Thus, with regard to pain of strictly bone origin, unresponsive patients are quite rare. Oral administration also is effective, but due to its limited intestinal absorption the effective dose is on the order of 1600-3200 mg/day. These doses usually are well tolerated, but they may be a problem for severely ill patients. Furthermore, the efficacy of treatment becomes apparent only after a few days. Thus, oral clodronate usually is adopted as a continuation of an i.v. course. The duration of the i.v. therapy should be individualized, but usually the more prolonged the treatment the longer the duration of the effect. For practical reasons, clodronate is infused daily for 5 days (Monday-Friday) and the treatment course is repeated at the time of any significant recurrence. The oral continuation prevents or delays the recurrence of bone pain in most patients, but in some patients this therapy has to be integrated occasionally with i.v. infusion. The duration of the effect for the same bioavailable dose is somewhat related to the degree of malignancy of the primary tumor. In an uncontrolled study, the author also evaluated the effectiveness of alendronate given either i.v. or orally. A single infusion of 5 mg alendronate i.v. produces roughly the symptomatic effect of 5 i.v. infusions of 300 mg clodronate. Alendronate, 40 mg orally/day, was effective in reducing bone pain in 11 of 12 patients with bone metastases due to prostate carcinoma but who were not confined to bed. In some patients with prostate carcinoma and a diffuse metastatic invasion of the skeleton, there is indirect biochemical and histologic evidence of osteomalacia. This can be aggravated by bisphosphonate administration because of the transient striking prevalence of osteoblastic activity over bone resorption, which also occasionally causes the appearance of symptomatic hypocalcemia. Therefore, the use of large oral supplements of calcium is recommended, particularly at the start of therapy. It is conceivable that these calcium supplements also may be able to improve the final clinical outcome of the bisphosphonate therapy. In conclusion, administration of large doses of bisphosphonates is one of the most cost-effective palliation treatments for patients with prostate carcinoma with bone metastases, both as first-line therapy and in the long term. With appropriate doses, a large proportion of patients can be maintained free of bone pain until death. Studies of the ability of lower doses to prevent skeletal morbidity in patients without metastases or with asymptomatic bone lesions are warranted.

摘要

大多数晚期前列腺癌患者有疼痛性骨转移,这会导致严重的骨骼病变和残疾。这些转移灶大多是骨硬化性的,但研究表明,转移灶内异常的成骨细胞骨形成之前会有破骨细胞活化,而这似乎与骨痛有关。这为使用双膦酸盐提供了理论依据,双膦酸盐是破骨细胞骨吸收的强效选择性抑制剂。已证实几种双膦酸盐对治疗几种以破骨细胞骨吸收异常为特征的疾病临床上有用,包括佩吉特病、原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进、骨髓瘤和骨转移。其在缓解前列腺癌骨转移患者疼痛方面的疗效已在一些研究中得到证实。双膦酸盐氯膦酸盐在研究单位进行了广泛研究。静脉注射(300毫克/天)时,骨痛在3天内明显缓解,有时之前会有短暂的疼痛加剧。这些临床结果非常一致,残余疼痛通常源于骨外。因此,对于严格源于骨的疼痛,无反应的患者相当罕见。口服给药也有效,但由于其肠道吸收有限,有效剂量约为1600 - 3200毫克/天。这些剂量通常耐受性良好,但对重症患者可能是个问题。此外,治疗效果几天后才会显现。因此,口服氯膦酸盐通常作为静脉注射疗程的延续。静脉治疗的持续时间应个体化,但通常治疗时间越长,效果持续时间越长。出于实际原因,氯膦酸盐每天静脉注射5天(周一至周五),在任何明显复发时重复治疗疗程。口服延续治疗可预防或延迟大多数患者骨痛复发,但在一些患者中,这种治疗有时必须与静脉注射相结合。相同生物利用度剂量的效果持续时间与原发肿瘤的恶性程度有些相关。在一项非对照研究中,作者还评估了静脉注射或口服阿仑膦酸盐的有效性。静脉注射5毫克阿仑膦酸盐单次给药产生的症状性效果大致相当于静脉注射5次300毫克氯膦酸盐的效果。口服阿仑膦酸盐40毫克/天,对12例因前列腺癌发生骨转移但未卧床的患者中的11例减轻骨痛有效。在一些前列腺癌且骨骼有弥漫性转移浸润的患者中,有间接的生化和组织学证据表明存在骨软化症。双膦酸盐给药可能会加重这种情况,因为成骨细胞活性在骨吸收中短暂显著占优,这也偶尔会导致症状性低钙血症的出现。因此,建议大量口服补充钙,尤其是在治疗开始时。可以想象,这些钙补充剂也可能能够改善双膦酸盐治疗的最终临床结果。总之,大剂量双膦酸盐给药是前列腺癌骨转移患者最具成本效益的姑息治疗方法之一,无论是作为一线治疗还是长期治疗。使用适当剂量,很大一部分患者可以维持无骨痛直至死亡。有必要研究较低剂量在预防无转移或有无症状骨病变患者骨骼病变方面的能力。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验