Greendale G A, James M K, Espeland M A, Barrett-Connor E
Division of Geriatrics, UCLA School of Medicine, USA.
Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Nov 1;146(9):763-70. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009352.
The objective of this study was to assess: 1) the accuracy of a single self-report question about postmenopausal estrogen use; and 2) the performance and repeated measures agreement of a standardized hormone use interview. Women (n = 863) in the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions Trial (PEPI) completed a self-report baseline questionnaire (BQ) at enrollment and a History of Hormone Use interview (HHU) at the 3-month follow-up visit (HHU3mos). A subsample of 101 women completed a second HHU interview 3 years later (HHU3yrs). As determined by the HHU3mos, 479 (56%) of women had ever used postmenopausal estrogen and 261 (30%) had ever used postmenopausal progestin. The mean number of years since last estrogen or progestin use was 2.2 and 1.3 years, respectively. Overall, there was 95% agreement between self-reported estrogen use on the BQ and the HHU3mos (kappa = 0.91). Using the HHU3mos as the criterion standard, the BQ misclassified 2.3% of women as false positives and 6.3% as false negatives. The average duration of estrogen use in the false-negative classifications was 1.9 years (range: 1-9 years). On the HHU3mos, 39.7% of participants could not recall at least one of the specific details of estrogen use (preparation, dose, route, or starting or stopping year); similar patterns of recall were found for progestin use. Factors associated with discordant reporting of ever-use of ERT (BQ vs. HHU3mos) or incomplete reporting of estrogen/progestin use on the HHU3mos were: route of administration, recency of hormone use, duration of hormone use, and race. Age, years since menopause, education, income, and hysterectomy status were not related to discordant and/or incomplete reporting. Agreement between the HHU3mos and HHU3yrs for ever-use of estrogen was 85.2% (kappa = 0.71). In sum, a single self-report question was adequate to ascertain ever-use of postmenopausal estrogen. When a structured interview form was used, details of postmenopausal estrogen and progestin use were not well remembered. Some features of hormone use and participant characteristics were associated with completeness of recalled hormone use, which suggests the potential for differential misclassification.
1)关于绝经后雌激素使用的单个自我报告问题的准确性;2)标准化激素使用访谈的性能及重复测量一致性。绝经后雌激素/孕激素干预试验(PEPI)中的女性(n = 863)在入组时完成了一份自我报告基线问卷(BQ),并在3个月随访时完成了激素使用史访谈(HHU)(HHU3mos)。101名女性的子样本在3年后完成了第二次HHU访谈(HHU3yrs)。根据HHU3mos确定,479名(56%)女性曾使用过绝经后雌激素,261名(30%)曾使用过绝经后孕激素。自上次使用雌激素或孕激素以来的平均年数分别为2.2年和1.3年。总体而言,BQ上自我报告的雌激素使用情况与HHU3mos之间的一致性为95%(kappa = 0.91)。以HHU3mos作为标准参照,BQ将2.3%的女性误分类为假阳性,6.3%为假阴性。假阴性分类中雌激素使用的平均时长为1.9年(范围:1 - 9年)。在HHU3mos上,39.7%的参与者记不起雌激素使用的至少一项具体细节(制剂、剂量、途径或开始或停止年份);孕激素使用的回忆模式相似。与ERT使用情况报告不一致(BQ与HHU3mos相比)或HHU3mos上雌激素/孕激素使用报告不完整相关的因素有:给药途径、激素使用的近期性、激素使用时长和种族。年龄、绝经后的年数、教育程度、收入和子宫切除术状态与报告不一致和/或不完整无关。HHU3mos与HHU3yrs在雌激素使用情况上的一致性为85.2%(kappa = 0.71)。总之,单个自我报告问题足以确定绝经后雌激素的使用情况。当使用结构化访谈表时,绝经后雌激素和孕激素使用的细节并未被很好地记住。激素使用的一些特征和参与者特征与回忆起的激素使用完整性相关,这表明存在差异误分类的可能性。