Clayton D F
Department of Cell and Structural Biology, Beckman Institute, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801, USA.
J Neurobiol. 1997 Nov;33(5):549-71.
The songbird has emerged as an important model for study of brain-behavior relationships by virtue of its rich natural advantages and from the pioneering efforts of explorers using anatomical and behavioral approaches. Now, molecular biology is providing a new and complementary paradigm for discerning songbird brain organization and function. Here, I review the work over the last 10 years that has laid the foundation for approaching songbird biology from the molecular perspective. As a result of this work, specific hypotheses can now be framed and tested regarding the mechanisms behind song circuit formation, behavioral plasticity, and the boundaries of adaptability. Age-related changes in more than 15 molecules have been observed in the song system of juvenile zebra finches, and these changes seem to define specific phases in circuit development. In adult songbirds, ordinary song-related activities such as singing and listening cause dramatic increases in gene expression in brain areas specific to each activity. The sensitivity of gene activation is modulated as a result of experience in adulthood and also changes during juvenile song learning. These studies have provided unexpected insights into the functional organization of the song circuit and the potential role of extrinsic modulatory systems in directing and limiting plastic change in the brain. With this rich base of knowledge, and techniques of gene manipulation on the horizon, answers to old questions seem within our reach: What sets the boundaries of neural plasticity? What limits learning?
鸣禽凭借其丰富的天然优势以及解剖学和行为学方法的先驱者们的开拓性努力,已成为研究脑-行为关系的重要模型。如今,分子生物学为洞察鸣禽的脑组织结构和功能提供了一种全新的补充范式。在此,我回顾过去十年的研究工作,这些工作为从分子角度研究鸣禽生物学奠定了基础。这项工作的成果是,现在可以就鸣唱回路形成、行为可塑性以及适应性边界背后的机制提出并检验具体假设。在幼年斑胸草雀的鸣唱系统中观察到超过15种分子与年龄相关的变化,这些变化似乎界定了回路发育的特定阶段。在成年鸣禽中,诸如唱歌和聆听等普通的与鸣唱相关的活动会导致特定脑区的基因表达急剧增加。基因激活的敏感性会因成年期的经历而受到调节,并且在幼鸟鸣唱学习期间也会发生变化。这些研究为鸣唱回路的功能组织以及外在调节系统在指导和限制大脑可塑性变化中的潜在作用提供了意想不到的见解。有了这一丰富的知识基础以及即将出现的基因操纵技术,旧问题的答案似乎触手可及:是什么设定了神经可塑性的边界?是什么限制了学习?