• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

延迟时增强的元记忆:为什么学习判断会随时间改善?

Enhanced metamemory at delays: why do judgments of learning improve over time?

作者信息

Kelemen W L, Weaver C A

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Baylor University, Waco, Texas 76798, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997 Nov;23(6):1394-409. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.23.6.1394.

DOI:10.1037//0278-7393.23.6.1394
PMID:9372607
Abstract

Judgments of learning (JOLs) made after a 5-min delay are almost perfectly accurate: the "delayed-JOL effect" (T. O. Nelson & J. Dunlosky, 1991). The mechanisms underlying this phenomenon have been the subject of debate. This study examined the effects of delays and short-term memory (STM) distraction on memory and metamemory (JOLs). STM distraction (2.5-30 s) immediately following encoding increased both JOL accuracy and mean cued recall. However, JOLs made after longer delays (4-5 min) were even more accurate. In addition, making a JOL at longer delays improved cued-recall performance. Conditional probabilities of cued recall (given successful initial retrieval) also increased over time and with interference, indicating that delayed JOLs may alter what they assess. Finally, increased confidence was associated with shorter JOL latencies only at delays. The results are consistent with an accessibility view of metamemory (e.g., A. Koriat, 1993).

摘要

在延迟5分钟后做出的学习判断(JOLs)几乎完全准确:即“延迟JOL效应”(T. O. 纳尔逊和J. 邓洛斯基,1991年)。这一现象背后的机制一直是争论的焦点。本研究考察了延迟和短期记忆(STM)干扰对记忆和元记忆(JOLs)的影响。编码后立即进行的STM干扰(2.5 - 30秒)提高了JOL的准确性和平均线索回忆率。然而,在更长延迟(4 - 5分钟)后做出的JOLs甚至更准确。此外,在更长延迟时做出JOL可提高线索回忆表现。线索回忆的条件概率(给定成功的初始检索)也随时间和干扰增加,这表明延迟的JOLs可能会改变它们所评估的内容。最后,只有在延迟时,信心增加才与更短的JOL潜伏期相关。这些结果与元记忆的可及性观点一致(例如,A. 科里亚特,1993年)。

相似文献

1
Enhanced metamemory at delays: why do judgments of learning improve over time?延迟时增强的元记忆:为什么学习判断会随时间改善?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997 Nov;23(6):1394-409. doi: 10.1037//0278-7393.23.6.1394.
2
When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the "Displaced-JOL effect".当人们的学习判断(JOLs)在预测后续回忆方面极其准确时:“错位JOL效应” 。
Memory. 2018 Jul;26(6):771-783. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1406523. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
3
Processing similarity does not improve metamemory: evidence against transfer-appropriate monitoring.加工相似性并不能改善元记忆:反对迁移适配性监测的证据。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Nov;29(6):1058-65. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1058.
4
Judgments of learning (JOLs) selectively improve memory depending on the type of test.学习判断(JOLs)可以根据测试类型有选择性地提高记忆效果。
Mem Cognit. 2020 Jul;48(5):745-758. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01025-5.
5
The Influence of Retrieval Practice Versus Delayed Judgments of Learning on Memory: Resolving a Memory-Metamemory Paradox.检索练习与学习延迟判断对记忆的影响:解决记忆-元记忆悖论
Exp Psychol. 2015;62(4):254-63. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000296. Epub 2015 Jan 1.
6
A model for stochastic drift in memory strength to account for judgments of learning.一种用于解释学习判断的记忆强度随机漂移模型。
Psychol Rev. 2005 Oct;112(4):932-50. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.932.
7
Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect.线索类型对学习判断(JOL)及延迟JOL效应的重要性。
Mem Cognit. 1992 Jul;20(4):374-80. doi: 10.3758/bf03210921.
8
The neurocognitive basis of metamemory: Using the N400 to study the contribution of fluency to judgments of learning.元记忆的神经认知基础:使用 N400 研究流畅度对学习判断的贡献。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2020 Mar;169:107176. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2020.107176. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
9
Influence of cue word perceptual information on metamemory accuracy in judgement of learning.线索词知觉信息对学习判断中元记忆准确性的影响。
Memory. 2016;24(3):383-98. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1009470. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
10
Judgments of learning enhance recall for category-cued but not letter-cued items.学习判断增强了类别提示但不是字母提示项目的回忆。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Oct;51(7):1547-1561. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01417-3. Epub 2023 May 12.

引用本文的文献

1
I remember it now, so I'll remember it later: Working memory strength guides predictions for long-term memory performance.我现在想起来了,以后也会记得:工作记忆强度指导对长期记忆表现的预测。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Nov;52(8):1775-1797. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01514-3. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
2
Do Judgments of Learning Impair Recall When Uninformative Cues Are Salient?当无信息线索显著时,学习判断会影响回忆吗?
J Intell. 2023 Oct 23;11(10):203. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11100203.
3
Exploring the Role of Attentional Reorienting in the Reactive Effects of Judgments of Learning on Memory Performance.
探究注意重新定向在学习判断对记忆表现的反应性影响中的作用。
J Intell. 2023 Aug 15;11(8):164. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11080164.
4
Identifying causal subsequent memory effects.识别因果性后续记忆效应。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Mar 28;120(13):e2120288120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2120288120. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
5
The effect of delayed judgments of learning on retention.学习延迟判断对记忆保持的影响。
Metacogn Learn. 2021;16(2):407-429. doi: 10.1007/s11409-021-09260-0. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
6
Making judgments of learning enhances memory by inducing item-specific processing.判断学习通过诱导项目特异性加工来增强记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2021 Jul;49(5):955-967. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01133-2. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
7
Metacognitive preserved generation strategy benefits for both younger and elderly participants with schizophrenia.元认知保存生成策略有益于年轻和老年精神分裂症患者。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 20;15(11):e0241356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241356. eCollection 2020.
8
Reactivity to Measures of Metacognition.对元认知测量的反应性。
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 6;10:2755. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02755. eCollection 2019.
9
Acute Physical Exercise Can Influence the Accuracy of Metacognitive Judgments.急性身体运动可以影响元认知判断的准确性。
Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 27;9(1):12412. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-48861-3.
10
Do confidence ratings prime confidence?自信评分能激发自信吗?
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Jun;26(3):1035-1042. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1553-3.